All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #1  
ajjohnsonnc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Knightdale, NC, USA
Default AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM??

ok ok... i did search, but nada for b16 vs aebs im #'s! plenty for b18's (2-6 hp over ITR), but what about gains i might expect from an aebs im on a 00 Si B16???

thanks
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 04:51 PM
  #2  
JDMSiGuy17's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

bump cuz i would like to know too!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
DIFFUT'S INC.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK CITY, NY, NY
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (JDMSiGuy17)

better and smoother air flow = HP
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2004 | 05:09 PM
  #4  
ajjohnsonnc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Knightdale, NC, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (DIFFUT'S INC.)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DIFFUT’S INC. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">better and smoother air flow = HP</TD></TR></TABLE>

right, but no #'s????


or simple logic = B16&lt;ITR&lt;AEBS (how much does an ITR make on a B16??? then just add a few HP)
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 09:01 AM
  #5  
ajjohnsonnc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Knightdale, NC, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

bump cause i wanna know!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2004 | 01:00 PM
  #6  
ajjohnsonnc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Knightdale, NC, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

NOBODY?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 06:10 AM
  #7  
ajjohnsonnc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Knightdale, NC, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

c'mon
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 06:36 AM
  #8  
johnzm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

300HP!!

actually, im thinking of porting and installing my AEBS on my 1st gen b16 this weekend. maybe ill throw it on the dyno for some before and after....
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 01:23 AM
  #9  
dcsports's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
From: maryland, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (johnzm)

^^ im planning on getting one for my jdm b16 also let me know how it goes
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 06:28 AM
  #10  
johnzm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (dcsports)

look for it next week.
unfortunatly, i wont be able to swap TB's at the same time so its prb gonna be
OEM 1st gen b16 IM Vs AEBS/ITR TB

if anyone has a 2nd gen b16 mani thats got EVERYTHING (including TB) on it PM me ill throw it on and test it too
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #11  
CHEETAH's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (ajjohnsonnc1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ajjohnsonnc1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok ok... i did search, but nada for b16 vs aebs im #'s! plenty for b18's (2-6 hp over ITR), but what about gains i might expect from an aebs im on a 00 Si B16???

thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>

I do know that we've seen very minimal gains on top in a stock b16a with 2nd gen b16 manifold vs. ITR ... the ITR manifold lagged slightly in the bottom ~ 3-5.5krpm if i remember ... I think it has to do with smaller diameter runners vs smaller displacement motors ... makes sense why Toda designed a 48mm ITB for the CTR motor ...

greg
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #12  
erebunicrx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: 860, ct, usa
Default

i have a crx with almost stock ls swap and b16 tranny. my friend has a sir2 motor swap in his eg coupe. we have always been very close to equal in a drag race. we did his aebs mani and then raced and i pulled on him hard after it was on. maybe it needs to be tuned or something but i will tell you i dont think he got any more power from it. i think that you must need some kinda mods like cams to see some gains.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
rodrez.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,936
Likes: 0
From: King Tubbys studio, CA
Default Re: (erebunicrx)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by erebunicrx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have a crx with almost stock ls swap and b16 tranny. my friend has a sir2 motor swap in his eg coupe. we have always been very close to equal in a drag race. we did his aebs mani and then raced and i pulled on him hard after it was on. maybe it needs to be tuned or something but i will tell you i dont think he got any more power from it. i think that you must need some kinda mods like cams to see some gains.</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's not accurate at all. There's way too many factors, from driver error, to tire/road conditions, etc.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #14  
erebunicrx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: 860, ct, usa
Default Re: (rodrez.)

whats not accurate about that? we race on the same road all the time, we did not change tires or nothing. bottom line my car was faster after he installed the intake manifold. first off the car has no bottom end att all and then add a bigger im on a pretty much stock motor and not tune it. it lost more. Done
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 12:44 PM
  #15  
Deetz's Avatar
Crazy Honda Guy
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 19
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (johnzm)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> if anyone has a 2nd gen b16 mani thats got EVERYTHING (including TB) on it PM me ill throw it on and test it too</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ya, the P30 manifold is suposed to be the one to beat. If i didn't live so far away up here in Canada, i'd send you one.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #16  
B16EJ's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg,MB,CA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (Deetz)

I know back from the dead and all but I have a book with nothing but honda dyno runs and on a b16 they tried every IM that there was from stock to aftermarket and the IM that outperformed EVERY other was a ported b16IM. It got some rediculous gain of like 7 hp mid to upper rpm band as opposed to stock b16 IM and all the others actually showed hp losses even the ITR manifold. And the author/tester was some guy who was big in autoxing he had pics of his del sol in some events. I was just reading info on b16 dyno runs and thought I would shed some light on the info I have concerning intake manifolds. If anyone calls b.s I will get the book later and post the name of it if anyone's interested, my buddy has it right now.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #17  
goforbroke's Avatar
MEAT PATTY
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,633
Likes: 2
From: White Suburbia, PA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (B16EJ)

Does anyone know the weight difference between these two intake manifolds?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 11:08 AM
  #18  
JerseySiPOS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
From: POSeRs, NJ, US
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (goforbroke)

We've seen the AEBS vs ITR manifold comparison.

But i have to say, whether a B16, B18, or B20, i've personally never seen any manifold making more average hp up to about 8000 rpms than the p30 manifold.

The p30 manifold for most setups dominates up to 8000 rpms. And if i were to rev to about 8500, i would choose a PORTED P30 manifold.

However, i like this thread, this is a new comparison.

Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #19  
biassj's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Sexy no Jutsu
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (B16EJ)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16EJ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know back from the dead and all but I have a book with nothing but honda dyno runs and on a b16 they tried every IM that there was from stock to aftermarket and the IM that outperformed EVERY other was a ported b16IM. It got some rediculous gain of like 7 hp mid to upper rpm band as opposed to stock b16 IM and all the others actually showed hp losses even the ITR manifold. And the author/tester was some guy who was big in autoxing he had pics of his del sol in some events. I was just reading info on b16 dyno runs and thought I would shed some light on the info I have concerning intake manifolds. If anyone calls b.s I will get the book later and post the name of it if anyone's interested, my buddy has it right now.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have the same book, and saw similar gains on other dynos. Turbo Magazine had a dyno with their 200 HP project Integra.


Red is Type R or Skunk2 manifold on both dynos


P30 vs Skunk2 Turbo Magazine


P30 vs Type R Royal with Cheese's Setup




Modified by biassj at 10:48 PM 6/9/2005


Modified by biassj at 10:49 PM 6/9/2005


Modified by biassj at 10:49 PM 6/9/2005
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #20  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (biassj)

which line is which?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #21  
hybrid_vtec's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,640
Likes: 1
From: VA Beach, VA, USA
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (JerseySiPOS)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JerseySiPOS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">We've seen the AEBS vs ITR manifold comparison.

But i have to say, whether a B16, B18, or B20, i've personally never seen any manifold making more average hp up to about 8000 rpms than the p30 manifold.

The p30 manifold for most setups dominates up to 8000 rpms. And if i were to rev to about 8500, i would choose a PORTED P30 manifold.

However, i like this thread, this is a new comparison.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have seen this myself many times with the P30 and Del Sol IM's. It made me wonder if I should dump my Skunk2 IM for a b16 IM modified to fit my LS!
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 08:58 AM
  #22  
97L-esVeeTeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: The all motor Forum but my house is in, Iowa
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (wantboost)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">which line is which?</TD></TR></TABLE>

IIRC, the red is type r
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #23  
92hatchattack's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (JerseySiPOS)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JerseySiPOS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">We've seen the AEBS vs ITR manifold comparison.

But i have to say, whether a B16, B18, or B20, i've personally never seen any manifold making more average hp up to about 8000 rpms than the p30 manifold.

The p30 manifold for most setups dominates up to 8000 rpms. And if i were to rev to about 8500, i would choose a PORTED P30 manifold.

However, i like this thread, this is a new comparison.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah, thats great, but who do you know thats offering ported b16 manis that have been proven to make power???
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #24  
JerseySiPOS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
From: POSeRs, NJ, US
Default Re: AEBS B16 Dyno #'s/ comp. vs stock B16 IM?? (92hatchattack)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92hatchattack &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

yeah, thats great, but who do you know thats offering ported b16 manis that have been proven to make power???</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think the Blox manifold is a ported B16 manifold, no? Someone correct me if im wrong. Other than that, i remember years ago, the Killer Bee manifold, but i don't think that went into production. Supposedly, it worked better than a stock b16 manifold up to 8k range.

Other than that, some porting on your own is good practice with the right tools.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #25  
IntegraVTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Danville, KY
Default

is there a difference between the USDM ITR manifold and the JDM ITR manifold, cause I had heard that the JDM manifold had bigger runners than the USDM ITR. Any truth to this?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:43 AM.