new here
whats up, i'm chris and i'm new here. i had a few questions about the older civic's and crx's.
what year did the EF civic come out?
what do the EF civic weigh compared to the crx?
what year did the EF civic come out?
what do the EF civic weigh compared to the crx?
here the ED (Japan's EF) came out in 1988, and was continued through 1991.
The hatch and sedan are somewhat heavier than the CRX, and the CRX HF is the lightest of all the models, coming in a little under 2000 lbs.
The hatch and sedan are somewhat heavier than the CRX, and the CRX HF is the lightest of all the models, coming in a little under 2000 lbs.
ok so the popular 80's model civic's in the US are the ED chassis code.
see i dont own a honda at all, actually i'm a mazda guy. but i'm getting tired of no one ever making anything for the car i have. no aftermarket anything, except for the motor stuff, which isn't even for my car.
see i dont own a honda at all, actually i'm a mazda guy. but i'm getting tired of no one ever making anything for the car i have. no aftermarket anything, except for the motor stuff, which isn't even for my car.
lol, this is alittle off topic, but i was just reading the trial user faq and it says you stay a trial user for 20 days. i have been a trial user since last year. i thought that was kinda funny.
ok back on topic, is there also a thread that list all available bodykits and mods for the ED's?
ok back on topic, is there also a thread that list all available bodykits and mods for the ED's?
Trending Topics
Most people who like aero kits tend to lean toward's those made by Wings West.
http://www.wingswest.com/
http://www.wingswest.com/
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by amh0001 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is that just your avatar maybe?</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's gotta be it. There are 2001 members still rockin the "Trial User" smiley face avatar.
That's gotta be it. There are 2001 members still rockin the "Trial User" smiley face avatar.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRX_1.8T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey man this can help:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hey if you look at ext. features, it says remote operated mirror? is that just the little handle inside of the car? or is it ELECTRONIC
</TD></TR></TABLE>hey if you look at ext. features, it says remote operated mirror? is that just the little handle inside of the car? or is it ELECTRONIC
Holy ****..The HF makes 90ft/lbs at only 2000rpm?..
..Is that right?..
It cant be cause that would make the HF a torque monster..(Any motor that makes more torque then HP is a torque monster in my eyes..)
..Is that right?..It cant be cause that would make the HF a torque monster..(Any motor that makes more torque then HP is a torque monster in my eyes..)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRX_1.8T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey man this can help:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those are 88 weights i believe. They get progessively heavier up to 91....Si always being the heaviest for eack respective year.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Those are 88 weights i believe. They get progessively heavier up to 91....Si always being the heaviest for eack respective year.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by efniner91 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">use the search feature!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
That’s original! I haven't heard this one before.
That’s original! I haven't heard this one before.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mrspeaker »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Holy ****..The HF makes 90ft/lbs at only 2000rpm?..
..Is that right?..
It cant be cause that would make the HF a torque monster..(Any motor that makes more torque then HP is a torque monster in my eyes..)</TD></TR></TABLE>
HP is a factor of torque and RPM. Something having to do with torque * RPM / 5252 or something. The HF engines redline around 5000, so they don't rev high. The b16 has 160 HP and 111 lb/ft, but revs to at least 8500 RPM. HP is like how long you can make torque, I think of it that way.
My d15b8 makes 70 HP and 82 lb/ft, and it sucks.
..Is that right?..It cant be cause that would make the HF a torque monster..(Any motor that makes more torque then HP is a torque monster in my eyes..)</TD></TR></TABLE>
HP is a factor of torque and RPM. Something having to do with torque * RPM / 5252 or something. The HF engines redline around 5000, so they don't rev high. The b16 has 160 HP and 111 lb/ft, but revs to at least 8500 RPM. HP is like how long you can make torque, I think of it that way.
My d15b8 makes 70 HP and 82 lb/ft, and it sucks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by efniner91 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">use the search feature!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
i figured someone was gonna say it.
yeah i'm wanting to get a late 80's civ, but i'm undecided as to which one i wanna get, i guess the cheapest one i can find, but is also in good shape. i didnt like the sedans till i seen a few pics of them done up. so i guess any 88-91 civ.
are there any differences to the cars among the same trim model, between those years?
i figured someone was gonna say it.
yeah i'm wanting to get a late 80's civ, but i'm undecided as to which one i wanna get, i guess the cheapest one i can find, but is also in good shape. i didnt like the sedans till i seen a few pics of them done up. so i guess any 88-91 civ.
are there any differences to the cars among the same trim model, between those years?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
user 93082343
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
11
Feb 18, 2009 04:38 PM
balistic CRX
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
10
Feb 20, 2002 02:56 PM







