Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Dyno Results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 12:59 PM
  #1  
digital sol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 20
Default Dyno Results...

99 jdm itr
short ram intake
2.5" catback
2.5" carsound
hondata


like 178whp and 124 of torque

redline was raised to about 8900 rpm even though my tach reads like 9,500 rpm the hondata reads about 9k, when vtec engages its alot harder kick then before, pulls much harder while in vtec before and pulls all the way through, dont have a scanner to get the graph online
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #2  
Bbasso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,261
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: Dyno Results... (digital sol)

what car do you have this motor in?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #3  
1GreyTeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,136
Likes: 2
From: kuidaore
Default Re: Dyno Results... (digital sol)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">99 jdm itr
short ram intake
2.5" catback
2.5" carsound
hondata


like 178whp and 124 of torque

redline was raised to about 8900 rpm even though my tach reads like 9,500 rpm the hondata reads about 9k, when vtec engages its alot harder kick then before, pulls much harder while in vtec before and pulls all the way through, dont have a scanner to get the graph online</TD></TR></TABLE>


No piccy = No fun

I'd bet you could tune more from that setup.

Is it "like" 178 hp and 124 tq or are those the real numbers? jOO got a stock header?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
Bbasso's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 18,261
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: Dyno Results... (1GreyTeg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1GreyTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No piccy = No fun

I'd bet you could tune more from that setup.

Is it "like" 178 hp and 124 tq or are those the real numbers? jOO got a stock header?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Your right Anton, that motor is getting choked somewhere...
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #5  
JinDIESEL's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: killa, CA, USA
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Bbasso)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bbasso &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what car do you have this motor in?</TD></TR></TABLE>

im guessin.... del sol
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 02:33 PM
  #6  
Chris N's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,274
Likes: 0
Default Re: Dyno Results... (digital sol)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">99 jdm itr
short ram intake
2.5" catback
2.5" carsound
hondata


like 178whp and 124 of torque

redline was raised to about 8900 rpm even though my tach reads like 9,500 rpm the hondata reads about 9k, when vtec engages its alot harder kick then before, pulls much harder while in vtec before and pulls all the way through, dont have a scanner to get the graph online</TD></TR></TABLE>

Harder kick? Your car was tuned right?

One objective of tuning is to gain some midrange (since we dont have any at all), a typical B series VTEC engine falls off in HP just before VTEC engagement, the idea is to flatten that hump out by making more power in the 4-6k range. That kick seems to suggest that you have a big surge of power on your dyno chart at whatever your engagement point is. That's not indicative of good tuning at all!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #7  
Jon D's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,340
Likes: 1
From: Homie dont, play that, USA
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Chris N)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

That's not indicative of good tuning at all!</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is very true!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #8  
Slow_Em1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Chris N)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Harder kick? Your car was tuned right?

One objective of tuning is to gain some midrange (since we dont have any at all), a typical B series VTEC engine falls off in HP just before VTEC engagement, the idea is to flatten that hump out by making more power in the 4-6k range. That kick seems to suggest that you have a big surge of power on your dyno chart at whatever your engagement point is. That's not indicative of good tuning at all!</TD></TR></TABLE> 100% true...i know a local tuner..(@ries) and he explained this to me. ive seen dyno graphs when they fall the their face then vtec pops and it pulls a lot harder...this is good for those stunna's tryin 2 impress dem' girlZ...they be like dem girl chek my mad v attack y0.

but yea...harder kick usually means losing power.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #9  
Chubz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,546
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Re: Dyno Results... (digital sol)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">99 jdm itr
short ram intake
2.5" catback
2.5" carsound
hondata


like 178whp and 124 of torque

redline was raised to about 8900 rpm even though my tach reads like 9,500 rpm the hondata reads about 9k, when vtec engages its alot harder kick then before, pulls much harder while in vtec before and pulls all the way through, dont have a scanner to get the graph online</TD></TR></TABLE>

with a 97 jdm itr motor pulled

189/129 with:
Comptech Intake and Icebox
DC JDM 4-1 header
2.5 inch test pipe
and 2.5 inch stainless exhaust
97 JDM ITR ECU

only thing tuned was timing and fuel pressure

Now I just added: Kenji ECU and CTR Intake came and VAFCII, heading to the dyno at the end of the week
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 03:30 AM
  #10  
1999all_motoR_teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 970
Likes: 1
From: all motor Toronto Canada, Canada
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Chubzilla)

If I'm not mistaken, I believe all year JDM ITR motors come with the exact same spec intake camshaft as the CTR cam.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 04:03 AM
  #11  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: Dyno Results... (1999all_motoR_teg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1999all_motoR_teg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If I'm not mistaken, I believe all year JDM ITR motors come with the exact same spec intake camshaft as the CTR cam.</TD></TR></TABLE>

98+ JDM ITR's have the CTR intake cam, 96-97 do not.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:52 AM
  #12  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Chris N)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That kick seems to suggest that you have a big surge of power on your dyno chart at whatever your engagement point is. That's not indicative of good tuning at all!</TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree. Ironically though, I recall reading that a certain somewhat prominent "tuner" actually tunes so there is a large surge when VTEC engages, in order to make the car "more fun to drive".
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #13  
MattD@Stoptech's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,264
Likes: 1
From: Jasma
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Padawan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I agree. Ironically though, I recall reading that a certain somewhat prominent "tuner" actually tunes so there is a large surge when VTEC engages, in order to make the car "more fun to drive". </TD></TR></TABLE>

Some ppl want that...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:55 AM
  #14  
Pondus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Molde, Norway
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Reid)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Reid &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

98+ JDM ITR's have the CTR intake cam, 96-97 do not. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Do you know if the same applies to a 98 B18C6 Euro spec engine?
Ours are mostly the same spec as the JDM B18C only we get the same crappy exhaust manifold as you americans?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 08:29 AM
  #15  
digital sol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 20
Default Re: Dyno Results... (Bbasso)

i know it wasnt tuned to its best, it made 177whp 1 year ago with the same modifications but un-tuned. Its now tuned and made less power...., the only difference in modifications is it no longer has msd digital 6 ignition. They are the only hondata tuner in my area and my car was one of the first they"ve tuned with that system, i just wanted it not to be so rich and mess anything up. The closest other tuner that is very good with hondata is a 4 hour drive, i figured id just tow my car down sometime after winter when i get more mods and then have them tune it for max power. For now i just wanted to stop fouling plugs and have a smooth ride quality. My car was also very hot during the dyno time, my fan took a **** and they rushed the runs to get it done before closing time. I was hoping for much higher numbers but ill be returning for more tuning at a better tuning shop sometime before next summer with smsp header, bc3 cams, bc cam gear, comptech icebox, an exhaust they dosnt have corkscrew bends and possibly some itb's, better gaskets/seals.

motor only has about 16k miles on it and it is jdm, compression was 240 with 5-6 cranks all the way across, the last owner only owned the motor for about 6 months but he drove the car pretty hard, and it was un-tuned during that time so ive been trying to run cleaner products through it.

any kind of adjustments or replacement parts i can use to spice things up? Maybe he seals here and there...

Any-1 use sea-foam, i was thinking of running it through sometime next week, i know there has to be alot of crap and soot inside because it was driven un-tuned for like 5 months by the previous owner, it was just on a gsr basemap with very, very minimal tuning, what kinda products do you reccomend for cleaning it up inside?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #16  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default

maybe i missed it, but why was redline raised so high? is the extra couple hundred RPM really worth blowing the rods through the block? if you are on stock internals i wouldnt recommend keeping your rev limit that high. been there, done that.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #17  
digital sol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 20
Default Re: Dyno Results... (1GreyTeg)

called the shop the actual number was 172whp and 120 of torque, 5whp less then when it was dyno'd un-tuned less then 1 year ago while in the previous owners posession, only diff is he was also running msd ignition

and yea, stock jdm header
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #18  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: (RTW DC2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">maybe i missed it, but why was redline raised so high? is the extra couple hundred RPM really worth blowing the rods through the block? if you are on stock internals i wouldnt recommend keeping your rev limit that high. been there, done that. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I don't see any reason why stock ITR internals couldn't handle 8900 RPM with the proper valvetrain (in fact, many consistently do). What were the circumstances surrounding your situation?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:08 AM
  #19  
digital sol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 20
Default Re: (RTW DC2)

redline was raised that high because thats the way it was on the basemap they loaded, set for like 8900, i dont plan on taking it that high, i usually switch right around 8400rpm, thats where the power drops off anways, it dosnt make much sense to me either, id rather just have it redline at 8400 so i dont gotta worry about it, they didnt ask me, they just did it so im stuck with it for now
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #20  
Allmotor2o9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: NorCal, Ca
Default Re: (digital sol)

Motor made 206whp 131tq@ 9000 rpm
The best time ran with this motor was a 12.40@ 108 MPH


B18c5 2000 type R block
Civic type R pistons with stock ITR crank and Rods
Nuforms blockgaurd, total seal piston rings


B16a head port & polished with 3 angle valve job by Portflow
Skunk2 valvesprings and retainers
ITR lost motion (lifters), ITR rocker arms
Fierra valves, Bronze valve guilds, ARP head bolts
Skunk2 stage 2 cams with A.E.M adjustable sprockets
Skunk2 port-matched manifold with ITR throttle body


2000 JDM ITR tranny (4.7 final)
Toda Light weight flywheel
A.C.T pressure plate with street/strip clucth


Custom header made by MIDNIGHT PERFORMANCE

A.E.M fuel rail with A.E.M fuel regulator
R C 440cc injectors
P28 with Hondata S200 Dyno tuned to motor by MIDNIGHT PERFORMANCE
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LU
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
28
May 10, 2012 09:16 AM
vtecmissle
Acura TSX
9
Jun 22, 2006 10:07 AM
allmotorjdism
Acura Integra
12
Oct 10, 2005 04:45 AM
hatch4raceb16
Honda Prelude
12
Dec 24, 2003 09:04 AM
CivicTypeRP
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
14
Sep 29, 2003 06:41 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:13 PM.