Higher reving?
I think your goal should be to make power before 7200 rpm.
But hey, if you want to have to rev like hell to make power, knock yourself out and your engine with it.
But hey, if you want to have to rev like hell to make power, knock yourself out and your engine with it.
your singlecam engine has a very poor port design which can only be fixed through extensive portwork and flow testing, by the time your done buying the time on the flow bench, a good cam, and valve train you could have compled a twin cam swap. just something to think about.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civictildeath »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">like they said why?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
b/c he'll be boosted and will be making power above 7200 rpms
b/c he'll be boosted and will be making power above 7200 rpms
Trending Topics
the reason to up the rpms would be to increase the area under the curve: a.k.a. what really matters.
could someone actually answer the question. i know it depends on how much higher one would like to go but give examples as to the limits of the stock head, stock bottom end, etc. and the options in dealing with those limits
could someone actually answer the question. i know it depends on how much higher one would like to go but give examples as to the limits of the stock head, stock bottom end, etc. and the options in dealing with those limits
you get a chipped ecu that lets you exceed the rev limit it wont matter, you'll feel a dramatic loss in power. you should actually feel a dramatic loss in power after 6600 rpm, since that is the peak torque in rpms for a d16z6. even with new cams, it wont make a difference, unless you had forced induction. but if you were getting any type of forced induction, you should already know the steps you must take to ensure that you dont abuse your motor. cams, rockers, valves, retainers, pistions, block guard.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by umaagon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> you should actually feel a dramatic loss in power after 6600 rpm, since that is the peak torque in rpms for a d16z6. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Hrm, well, unless I am misunderstood... it isnt the torque alone that determines power dropping... if the HP is still higher than the rate that the torque rate is dropping, it should be able to maintain that level of pull...
Gurus please correct me if I am wrong... but wouldnt it be right in stating that? That as long as the HP is still higher,.. it wont pull harder, but the same power/pull will be extended through the rest of the RPM band until the TQ drops faster than the HP can make up?
Hrm, well, unless I am misunderstood... it isnt the torque alone that determines power dropping... if the HP is still higher than the rate that the torque rate is dropping, it should be able to maintain that level of pull...
Gurus please correct me if I am wrong... but wouldnt it be right in stating that? That as long as the HP is still higher,.. it wont pull harder, but the same power/pull will be extended through the rest of the RPM band until the TQ drops faster than the HP can make up?
I heard somewhere that stock valvetrain can handle very very high revs on a sohc(I upgraded them anyway). Upgrade to arp rod bolts, stronger rods, and headstuds and you should be ok. Rods is a big deal, stock ones are tiny.
horsepower is not actually a measureable value, it is a direct relation to torque varying by rpm, ie:100 fp torque at 3000 rpms is less horsepower than 100 fp of torque at 7000 rpms, so when torque falls drastically at high rpms horsepower potential is lost due to its direct relation.
i don't know why some people are saying he won't be able to make power higher than the stock redline with a different cam. Depending on the cam you get you could possibly make power higher than the stock redline. You may want to look into the crower stage 2, zex 59300 cam, skunk2 cam etc. Also i would go ahead and upgrade your valvetrain if you are gonna be revving higher.
rgr, I know it isnt measurable, but when the equation comes in, TQ can peak and fall, but because of what HP is, it simply is the extent the peak power is extended.... So... with TQ at high RPM you can take advantage of gearing, and potentially pull ahead of BIG TQ with short gears... blah blah... its sooo complicated...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CooBlueDAB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hrm, well, unless I am misunderstood... it isnt the torque alone that determines power dropping... if the HP is still higher than the rate that the torque rate is dropping, it should be able to maintain that level of pull...
Gurus please correct me if I am wrong... but wouldnt it be right in stating that? That as long as the HP is still higher,.. it wont pull harder, but the same power/pull will be extended through the rest of the RPM band until the TQ drops faster than the HP can make up?</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CooBlueDAB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">rgr, I know it isnt measurable, but when the equation comes in, TQ can peak and fall, but because of what HP is, it simply is the extent the peak power is extended.... So... with TQ at high RPM you can take advantage of gearing, and potentially pull ahead of BIG TQ with short gears... blah blah... its sooo complicated...</TD></TR></TABLE>
the horse power vs. torque concept isnt complicated at all. hp is torque x rpm/5252. that is it. that is why the torque always is equal to the horsepower at 5252. when considering shift points and tuning for practical application, you focus on creating a usable torque curve. the hp made is just a pretty number
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by revolution8k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A sohc 2v motor will have trouble breathing at a higher RPM, no point to it. Worry about making power in the rpm band you already have.</TD></TR></TABLE>i dont think you know what your talking about
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHC_MShue »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i don't know why some people are saying he won't be able to make power higher than the stock redline with a different cam. Depending on the cam you get you could possibly make power higher than the stock redline. You may want to look into the crower stage 2, zex 59300 cam, skunk2 cam etc. Also i would go ahead and upgrade your valvetrain if you are gonna be revving higher.</TD></TR></TABLE>thank you for a simple informative post(there were others but this was the most direct)
<rant>im tired of idiots opening their mouths
not particularly in this thread but on ht in general </rant>
Gurus please correct me if I am wrong... but wouldnt it be right in stating that? That as long as the HP is still higher,.. it wont pull harder, but the same power/pull will be extended through the rest of the RPM band until the TQ drops faster than the HP can make up?</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CooBlueDAB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">rgr, I know it isnt measurable, but when the equation comes in, TQ can peak and fall, but because of what HP is, it simply is the extent the peak power is extended.... So... with TQ at high RPM you can take advantage of gearing, and potentially pull ahead of BIG TQ with short gears... blah blah... its sooo complicated...</TD></TR></TABLE>
the horse power vs. torque concept isnt complicated at all. hp is torque x rpm/5252. that is it. that is why the torque always is equal to the horsepower at 5252. when considering shift points and tuning for practical application, you focus on creating a usable torque curve. the hp made is just a pretty number
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by revolution8k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A sohc 2v motor will have trouble breathing at a higher RPM, no point to it. Worry about making power in the rpm band you already have.</TD></TR></TABLE>i dont think you know what your talking about
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHC_MShue »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i don't know why some people are saying he won't be able to make power higher than the stock redline with a different cam. Depending on the cam you get you could possibly make power higher than the stock redline. You may want to look into the crower stage 2, zex 59300 cam, skunk2 cam etc. Also i would go ahead and upgrade your valvetrain if you are gonna be revving higher.</TD></TR></TABLE>thank you for a simple informative post(there were others but this was the most direct)<rant>im tired of idiots opening their mouths
not particularly in this thread but on ht in general </rant>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fd3st04r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">horsepower is not actually a measureable value, it is a direct relation to torque varying by rpm, ie:100 fp torque at 3000 rpms is less horsepower than 100 fp of torque at 7000 rpms, so when torque falls drastically at high rpms horsepower potential is lost due to its direct relation. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes, and here is a perfect example
Yes, and here is a perfect example
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yellowturbo
Forced Induction
13
Jan 13, 2004 12:48 PM




