Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Persuade me to go turbo or na.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 04:28 AM
  #1  
speedymon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Persuade me to go turbo or na.

Alright people i can't decide if i want to go NA or turbo. I want na because of reliability and i can build up the car in pieces. But if i go turbo i can have mad hp, but it's at least 3Gs at once. I don't want to put done that much amount of money and then have to pay mad more money for little things. How much am i looking at after the 3 thousand initial investment besides dyno time.

Geez i'd have to replace my bolt ons. They're all useless. NA is looking like the way to go. Any ideas.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 04:54 AM
  #2  
Canuk_SiR's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (speedymon)

It's all about what you want out of the car. Do you want it to be a high power dragger/racer, or do you just want a bit more power? You'll be spending alot either way if you want to get power....
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 05:49 AM
  #3  
Spade's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 3
From: Redwood City, Ca
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (speedymon)

Um, hmm how much power?
If you are looking for just a little more power get some higher compression pistons and cams......1000 bucks later.

If you want more power than that, buy the turbo, deal with turbo lag and enjoy the top end.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
l's Avatar
l
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (speedymon)

ALL MOTOR~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and if you love the sound of psshhhh.... get a girl -=Z
or a CD of turbo tunes

Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 11:22 AM
  #5  
976's Avatar
976
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 1
From: Extraordinary Machine
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (CRXmadeinJapan)

Personaly I love the concept of all motor engines. However, lets say you have a 1.6 liter engine, to gain the most HP you would want to raise compression w/ new internals. Lets say you have a engine that is 2.0 liters or higher, you would be better off turbo'd.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 08:06 PM
  #6  
GSpeedR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (B21A)

I also like the NA route because you do not have to slap down $3000 at once. You can pick and choose different pieces and a lot can be installed yourself.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2001 | 12:32 AM
  #7  
SiREF8's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx., U.S.
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (GSpeedR)

Same here I like ALL MOTOR too, you can do it in steps if you want instead of at once as in turbo. Also you don't have to worry about anyone seeing your intercooler in front of the car compared to a sleeper.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2001 | 04:07 AM
  #8  
speedymon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (SiREF8)

Same here I like ALL MOTOR too, you can do it in steps if you want instead of at once as in turbo. Also you don't have to worry about anyone seeing your intercooler in front of the car compared to a sleeper.
true but can't i push like low boost w/o the intercooler and still have like 250 hp? But would it still have to be high maintanance.


[Modified by speedymon, 8:07 AM 12/22/2001]
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2001 | 06:55 AM
  #9  
chi1874436's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (speedymon)

It's all based on what you want to do with the car. If you don't want to do regular maintenance to the car, then go NA. Either route you go, you will be fast. Personally I chose all motor because I LIKE ALL MOTOR. I just love the sound of my VTEC sounding off @ 5600 rpms. I also like having an all motor build-up and practically beating or keeping up with turbo-charged cars. The only real maintenance that you will be doing is your regular oil changes; nothing else. Just my opinion. If you have the money to go turbo and able to easily replace parts, I would probably try this route. Just don't forget to tune.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
speedymon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
From: US
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (chi1874436)

NA for me. I've started phase one of my NA buildup. Muhahahahahahaahahah!!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2001 | 02:19 PM
  #11  
battyx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
From: greenerLA., USA
Default Re: Persuade me to go turbo or na. (speedymon)

I'm still having trouble over NA or FI. Only time will be able to tell.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stevenr2894
Forced Induction
41
Apr 15, 2013 06:41 AM
00pr3lude
Honda Prelude
15
Apr 4, 2008 06:09 PM
feriotypeR
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
Feb 25, 2008 11:59 AM
ramz7887
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
4
Aug 14, 2003 06:18 PM
1BadLude6986
Honda Prelude
31
Oct 12, 2002 02:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:19 PM.