Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 07:49 PM
  #1  
Rexemouse's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Western, Ma, Usa
Default Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission

I am swapping a b18 ls motor into my 4th gen civic. I I basically have everything but the transmission.(most of the turbo components, exedy stage 1 clutch, 4500 injectors, msd, guages, shift linkages, ex)

Now, I heard that an Ls Transmission is more suitable for turbocharging aposed to a Gsr Transmission... Is this true and if it is, why?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #2  
Makdaddynuge's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
From: louisiana, USA
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (Rexemouse)

you will never get a straight forward answer on this. It also depends on your demands. People with say a b16 is better because shorter gears = quicker acceleration. And a LS tranny has too long of gears. I think a GSR is the way to go, its in between the ls and b16, perfect for all around
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
z6's Avatar
z6
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, manitoba, Canada
Default

what youve got to do is use the gear ratios properly, you don t want to finish the quarter just after shifting to 5th, figure out your estimated mph in the quarter and then explore you options with gear sets and final drives.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #4  
_entropy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (Rexemouse)

Everything you have heard people saying about the LS transmission is wrong. Longer gears are not better for boost, technically it keeps your turbo spooled for "longer" but that just means you're accelerating slower. For a stock LS with a stock LS rev limit, the LS transmission is acceptable. If you do not have a transmission right now I would be on the hunt for a GSR transmission, they have perfectly spaced gears for great acceleration, but not too tight that you just blast through each gear spinning like a ****.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #5  
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
*insert here*
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
From: Wooster, OHIO, US
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

gsr is where it's at
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
BigBooster's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (VTECisSeXY)

i would recommend the GSR or b16 tranny as well. screw the LS. it's only good for saving gas.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 09:53 PM
  #7  
blackeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,820
Likes: 12
From: schooling kids in ny, usa
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by @lbert &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Everything you have heard people saying about the LS transmission is wrong. Longer gears are not better for boost, technically it keeps your turbo spooled for "longer" but that just means you're accelerating slower. For a stock LS with a stock LS rev limit, the LS transmission is acceptable. If you do not have a transmission right now I would be on the hunt for a GSR transmission, they have perfectly spaced gears for great acceleration, but not too tight that you just blast through each gear spinning like a ****.</TD></TR></TABLE>

im going gsr tranny in my ls turbo also. honestly, id love to have gsr 1-4 and an ls 5th gear. gsr tranny (redlining at 7 grand as per stock ls motor) tops out at like 53 in 2nd, 75 in 3rd, 99 in 4th and 130 in 5th. it supposedly also cruises at like 4200 ish at like 80mph in 5th gear. this is just a little higher than id like, but it should make the car a lil bit faster. i couldnt fathom a b16 tranny on there
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #8  
_entropy's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (blackeg)

The 4000 RPM drone does get a pinch annoying on the highway, but it is no big deal, and better than a B16 tranny atleast. I can't tell you how much more fun my car is to drive with the GSR trans vs. the LS trans though.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #9  
D-meet07's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

Well what about this. What kind of tranny would be needed for the 91 integra ls. I forget what the linkage is??? Im wanting longer gears as well for that road racing and that 1st gear holding to like 30-35 miles and hr.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #10  
11psiTurboSI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,004
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (turbo90lude)

b18c1 or b16a tranny!
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
blackeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,820
Likes: 12
From: schooling kids in ny, usa
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (turbo90lude)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbo90lude &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well what about this. What kind of tranny would be needed for the 91 integra ls. I forget what the linkage is??? Im wanting longer gears as well for that road racing and that 1st gear holding to like 30-35 miles and hr.</TD></TR></TABLE>


unless you feel like doing a cable-&gt;hydro conversion, stick with either the 91 ls stock tranny, or the tranny off a b17 gsr
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #12  
Tony Starks's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: Central, NJ
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (blackeg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blackeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">id love to have gsr 1-4 and an ls 5th gear.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I love mine
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #13  
vtec99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: midwest city, ok, united states
Default

i have the type r tranny and some people say that i show get rid of it should i im looking at making 350 to the ground on b16
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 08:42 AM
  #14  
vtec99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: midwest city, ok, united states
Default

bump
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #15  
blackeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,820
Likes: 12
From: schooling kids in ny, usa
Default Re: (vtec99)

ok since this thread is still alive, i have a real short vid of my ls with gsr trans going from 0-90..its not boosted yet, but if you watch the speedo and the tach it can give an idea of shift points and whatnot.

http://www.ezarchive.com:80/ez...8hVjU
left or right click to save

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtec99 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have the type r tranny and some people say that i show get rid of it should i im looking at making 350 to the ground on b16</TD></TR></TABLE>

the only thing i would to is get an aftermarket lsd, for i hear that the oem lsd's dont like too much hp and tq
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93ls10.0
Transmission & Drivetrain
25
Dec 2, 2010 11:07 AM
steveharrmr23
Transmission & Drivetrain
4
Oct 1, 2008 03:18 PM
ErikDaGenErik
Forced Induction
5
Jan 15, 2007 06:54 AM
Hoppa
Acura Integra
19
May 7, 2006 01:47 PM
Rain n Blood
Acura Integra
6
Aug 18, 2004 04:51 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 AM.