05 mph at redline at each gear
Just tested my car yesterday and wanted to share with you and also to compare with previous models to see if there is much difference
1st - 35mph 8300 rpms
2nd - 60mph 8300 rpms
3rd - 80 mph 8300-8500 rpms
4th - 110 mph 8500 rpms
5th - 140 mph 8500rmps
6th - ?? have no clue couldnt try it
1st - 35mph 8300 rpms
2nd - 60mph 8300 rpms
3rd - 80 mph 8300-8500 rpms
4th - 110 mph 8500 rpms
5th - 140 mph 8500rmps
6th - ?? have no clue couldnt try it
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Buitrex »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just tested my car yesterday and wanted to share with you and also to compare with previous models to see if there is much difference
1st - 35mph 8300 rpms
2nd - 60mph 8300 rpms
3rd - 80 mph 8300-8500 rpms
4th - 110 mph 8500 rpms
5th - 140 mph 8500rmps
6th - ?? have no clue couldnt try it
</TD></TR></TABLE>
if 5th is really 140...6th will be 160+???
1st - 35mph 8300 rpms
2nd - 60mph 8300 rpms
3rd - 80 mph 8300-8500 rpms
4th - 110 mph 8500 rpms
5th - 140 mph 8500rmps
6th - ?? have no clue couldnt try it
</TD></TR></TABLE>
if 5th is really 140...6th will be 160+???
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bootleg R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
if 5th is really 140...6th will be 160+???</TD></TR></TABLE>
most likely not. 6th doesnt have that kind of torque
if 5th is really 140...6th will be 160+???</TD></TR></TABLE>
most likely not. 6th doesnt have that kind of torque
you have hondata or sumthin? stock doesn't go to 8500. seems a little different though i can hit over 60 in second and i know i have had it over 140 in 5th. i dont know though.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AzCivic1.6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats cool, my damn civic sure as hell doesnt feel stable at anything over 120.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Same with the RSX Type-S
Same with the RSX Type-S
Damn, I hope you guys are testing these cars out on empty street. One mess up and you can kiss your *** goodbye.
If you guys are testing these speeds on stock type S tires I hope you pray before you do this. Type S stock tires are the worse tires ever made and should have never been put on the car or rather made for that instance.
As for the S, it does handle very well once you get a decent set of tires on it, the stocks seem to provide almost no traction and it will feel unstable at those speeds.
I have the Tein Flex with JDM ITR rims and the car handles like a dream, so once you get into suspension on the car you will a difference like night and day.
If you guys are testing these speeds on stock type S tires I hope you pray before you do this. Type S stock tires are the worse tires ever made and should have never been put on the car or rather made for that instance.
As for the S, it does handle very well once you get a decent set of tires on it, the stocks seem to provide almost no traction and it will feel unstable at those speeds.
I have the Tein Flex with JDM ITR rims and the car handles like a dream, so once you get into suspension on the car you will a difference like night and day.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by redronin22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The speed rating on the stock tires =
. also it has a mileage bias not a performance bias. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm running bridgestone potenze re730's and they ahve a 149+ mph rating, basically meaning they can handle any speed, i've seen 152 and its pretty damn stable...
. also it has a mileage bias not a performance bias. </TD></TR></TABLE>I'm running bridgestone potenze re730's and they ahve a 149+ mph rating, basically meaning they can handle any speed, i've seen 152 and its pretty damn stable...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




