Built a splitter today.
Today I was working on my car getting it ready for Summit so I deceided to try and build a splitter out of some scrap lexan I had lying around from my rear hatch. Anyway it came out decent and I couldn't resist snapping some pics. This will be a test run on the splitter, I'll make another once I get the new Password:JDM carbon lip. [plug]


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wtf, they allow show cars in echc?</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahaha, you know I'm a ricer at heart.
Sorry, no bling green 5pt. harness..
hahaha, you know I'm a ricer at heart.
Sorry, no bling green 5pt. harness..
ya, no crap!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wtf, they allow show cars in echc?</TD></TR></TABLE>
hope the splitter works for ya! look at those hoosiers sparkle.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wtf, they allow show cars in echc?</TD></TR></TABLE>
hope the splitter works for ya! look at those hoosiers sparkle.
Just curious:
How thick?
How supported?
How far back?
How heavy?
I considered using lexan when I build my aluminum splitter but I wasn't convinced that the strength:weight ratio was as good, nor as easily repaired.
How thick?
How supported?
How far back?
How heavy?
I considered using lexan when I build my aluminum splitter but I wasn't convinced that the strength:weight ratio was as good, nor as easily repaired.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by travis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Just curious:
How thick?
How supported?
How far back?
How heavy?
I considered using lexan when I build my aluminum splitter but I wasn't convinced that the strength:weight ratio was as good, nor as easily repaired. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Lexan is 1/8"
It is supported with 8 "L" shaped brackets on the sides, and riveted directly to the lip in the middle. I used about 30 rivet's.
It only goes back about 10 inches and it's cut with a curve like the front, not a full tray.
It's not too heavy, I may try aluminum when I do it next time.
I'll just give it a try, the lexan seems very durable. I can bend it in half and it won't split. Plus the entire lip and splitter cost me under $100.
How thick?
How supported?
How far back?
How heavy?
I considered using lexan when I build my aluminum splitter but I wasn't convinced that the strength:weight ratio was as good, nor as easily repaired. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Lexan is 1/8"
It is supported with 8 "L" shaped brackets on the sides, and riveted directly to the lip in the middle. I used about 30 rivet's.
It only goes back about 10 inches and it's cut with a curve like the front, not a full tray.
It's not too heavy, I may try aluminum when I do it next time.
I'll just give it a try, the lexan seems very durable. I can bend it in half and it won't split. Plus the entire lip and splitter cost me under $100.
Originally Posted by Octoman
Hmmm..... What is a splitter? Can someone identify it for me and what does it do?
Originally Posted by johng
This may or may not be helpful, and the following information is borrowed from another source.

A splitter generates downforce on the front of a car by creating pressure differentials. Actually a splitter produces a "downward force". It is not technically termed "downforce" unless the downward force is large enough to overcome the "upward" force caused by lift. But that is really just semantics.
This picture shows that as the incoming air reaches the front of the vehicle it must come to a stop before it turns to move either up and over, down and under, or around the vehicle. The area where the oncoming air flow comes to a stop is termed the "stagnation point". Since the velocity has gone down, the pressure has gone up (the "stagnation pressure). Thus the front of the moving vehicle is an area of relatively high pressure. Most people are well aware of this already.
One of the realities of pressure is that it acts in all directions. Thus the relatively high stagnation pressure at the front of a moving vehicle pushes back on the vehicle (creating drag). Now if we stick a splitter out on the bottom of the spoiler, then the stagnation pressure will also push down on the top of the splitter. But what is the pressure on the underside of the splitter? If it is the same as the pressure on top then there will be no force on the splitter. So let's examine the pressure underneath the splitter.
Since the splitter is close to the tarmac, it creates a restriction to air flowing underneath it (a mini-Venturi if you will). Just as water in a river speeds up when the river narrows, the air that is piled up in front of the spoiler must speed up if it wants to squeeze underneath the splitter. When an airstream speeds up, its pressure goes down. Thus the region between the splitter and the pavement is an area of low pressure. To recap; high pressure exists on top of the splitter, and low pressure exists beneath it. This adds up to a downward force on the splitter. And this downward force is directly proportional to the surface area of the splitter. So, up to a point, the bigger the splitter is, the more downforce it can create.
Some racecar designers have maximized the use of a front spoiler venturi.

If we examine the spoiler on the 1996 DTM/ITC Mercedes Benz shown above we notice that it does not have any kind of splitter. In fact, it has the opposite of a splitter. The lower portion of the spoiler curves back in towards the car, instead of jutting out into the stagnation region. The designers were trying to encourage the high pressure air in front of the spoiler to flow underneath the car. This way they could maximize the venturi effect underneath the front of the vehicle. In essence, the front spoiler region of the car forms a "mini ground-effect tunnel". In the "throat" region of the venturi, the air flow speeds up and hence the local pressure goes down. This creates downforce. The longer the throat region is, the more downforce that can be created. A simplified schematic of the air flow over and under a racecar with a spoiler venturi is shown below.

There are many possible permutations of the splitter/venturi spoiler idea. Some racecars use either just a splitter or just a venturi. Other designers have attempted to combine the two devices in an effort to maximize front downforce under modern racing regulations (which usually require a flat under-body from the front axle-line back).

A splitter generates downforce on the front of a car by creating pressure differentials. Actually a splitter produces a "downward force". It is not technically termed "downforce" unless the downward force is large enough to overcome the "upward" force caused by lift. But that is really just semantics.
This picture shows that as the incoming air reaches the front of the vehicle it must come to a stop before it turns to move either up and over, down and under, or around the vehicle. The area where the oncoming air flow comes to a stop is termed the "stagnation point". Since the velocity has gone down, the pressure has gone up (the "stagnation pressure). Thus the front of the moving vehicle is an area of relatively high pressure. Most people are well aware of this already.
One of the realities of pressure is that it acts in all directions. Thus the relatively high stagnation pressure at the front of a moving vehicle pushes back on the vehicle (creating drag). Now if we stick a splitter out on the bottom of the spoiler, then the stagnation pressure will also push down on the top of the splitter. But what is the pressure on the underside of the splitter? If it is the same as the pressure on top then there will be no force on the splitter. So let's examine the pressure underneath the splitter.
Since the splitter is close to the tarmac, it creates a restriction to air flowing underneath it (a mini-Venturi if you will). Just as water in a river speeds up when the river narrows, the air that is piled up in front of the spoiler must speed up if it wants to squeeze underneath the splitter. When an airstream speeds up, its pressure goes down. Thus the region between the splitter and the pavement is an area of low pressure. To recap; high pressure exists on top of the splitter, and low pressure exists beneath it. This adds up to a downward force on the splitter. And this downward force is directly proportional to the surface area of the splitter. So, up to a point, the bigger the splitter is, the more downforce it can create.
Some racecar designers have maximized the use of a front spoiler venturi.

If we examine the spoiler on the 1996 DTM/ITC Mercedes Benz shown above we notice that it does not have any kind of splitter. In fact, it has the opposite of a splitter. The lower portion of the spoiler curves back in towards the car, instead of jutting out into the stagnation region. The designers were trying to encourage the high pressure air in front of the spoiler to flow underneath the car. This way they could maximize the venturi effect underneath the front of the vehicle. In essence, the front spoiler region of the car forms a "mini ground-effect tunnel". In the "throat" region of the venturi, the air flow speeds up and hence the local pressure goes down. This creates downforce. The longer the throat region is, the more downforce that can be created. A simplified schematic of the air flow over and under a racecar with a spoiler venturi is shown below.

There are many possible permutations of the splitter/venturi spoiler idea. Some racecars use either just a splitter or just a venturi. Other designers have attempted to combine the two devices in an effort to maximize front downforce under modern racing regulations (which usually require a flat under-body from the front axle-line back).
You can only separate yourself from "Rice", and become "A Real Driver," if you can answer the following question:
How much downforce does it produce? (It's actually not that hard to determine but it takes a smooth road and putting a tie-wrap on a shock absorber shaft.)
I like asking kids with the big wings what downforce and drag numbers they get. Get a "huh?" response every single time.
How much downforce does it produce? (It's actually not that hard to determine but it takes a smooth road and putting a tie-wrap on a shock absorber shaft.)
I like asking kids with the big wings what downforce and drag numbers they get. Get a "huh?" response every single time.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kb58 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You can only separate yourself from "Rice", and become "A Real Driver," if you can answer the following question:
How much downforce does it produce? (It's actually not that hard to determine but it takes a smooth road and putting a tie-wrap on a shock absorber shaft.)
I like asking kids with the big wings what downforce and drag numbers they get. Get a "huh?" response every single time.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Sorry, I won't get that scientific.
I'll just drive it and see how if feels, if It feels better I'll keep it on. Turn 10 will be the test, if I feel more planted and maybe get a couple MPH on exit that is proof enough for me.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KOALA YUMMIES »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The paint is too nice to take that on the track.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's not as good as it looks, the photo hides all the damage. Plus I've got some speed wrinkles on my passenger rear fender courtesy of a 944 cup car.
How much downforce does it produce? (It's actually not that hard to determine but it takes a smooth road and putting a tie-wrap on a shock absorber shaft.)
I like asking kids with the big wings what downforce and drag numbers they get. Get a "huh?" response every single time.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Sorry, I won't get that scientific.
I'll just drive it and see how if feels, if It feels better I'll keep it on. Turn 10 will be the test, if I feel more planted and maybe get a couple MPH on exit that is proof enough for me. <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KOALA YUMMIES »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The paint is too nice to take that on the track.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's not as good as it looks, the photo hides all the damage. Plus I've got some speed wrinkles on my passenger rear fender courtesy of a 944 cup car.
cf lip? do many racers use them? i've gone off a few times and even managed to rip off my stock ex/si/whatever plastic lip. i would think a cf lip would get cracked pretty easily, no?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MichaelJComputer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cf lip? do many racers use them? </TD></TR></TABLE>
yes.
with great success also.
if its made properly it will stay together.
yes.
with great success also.
if its made properly it will stay together.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Doctor CorteZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if its made properly it will stay together.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not if you drive straight off in 5 it won't. I've seen that "ditch" eat radiators for breakfast.
Not if you drive straight off in 5 it won't. I've seen that "ditch" eat radiators for breakfast.
ours has been pulled off the car and run over for an entire world challenge race at Sebring.
barely had a scratch on it.
radiators and carbon kevlar/fiber splitters are two completely different entities.
barely had a scratch on it.
radiators and carbon kevlar/fiber splitters are two completely different entities.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Apocalypse »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Not if you drive straight off in 5 it won't. I've seen that "ditch" eat radiators for breakfast.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which I've done... I think I'll hold out til I find a decent plastic lip.
Not if you drive straight off in 5 it won't. I've seen that "ditch" eat radiators for breakfast.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which I've done... I think I'll hold out til I find a decent plastic lip.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MichaelJComputer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think I'll hold out til I find a decent plastic lip.</TD></TR></TABLE>
HDPE is what you want to use , it comes in white and its dirt cheap.
HDPE is what you want to use , it comes in white and its dirt cheap.
stolen from a different thread...... i think he likes the splitter.... 
He added some monster brakes too..... they flat spotted his 20 minute old $200 hoosier in about 2 seconds.... ahah....seems like the combo is working
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's unbelievable to me I actually ran a 126.6 (a personal best). I had a bunch of issues with the car, I was driving on 2 flattspotted tires(a little shaky), and having some brake and axle issues
Hopefully I can get everything worked out for next race. I'd like to get down to a 125.* with my current motor, then I'd be confident that I'll be able to hang once I get some decent power.
BTW: Thanks for everyones help and support this season, especially David and Dan. It's a great feeling to know when your having problems people are always there to help you out. ECHC rocks!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hunter »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well? how did the track test go?</TD></TR></TABLE>

He added some monster brakes too..... they flat spotted his 20 minute old $200 hoosier in about 2 seconds.... ahah....seems like the combo is working
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's unbelievable to me I actually ran a 126.6 (a personal best). I had a bunch of issues with the car, I was driving on 2 flattspotted tires(a little shaky), and having some brake and axle issues
Hopefully I can get everything worked out for next race. I'd like to get down to a 125.* with my current motor, then I'd be confident that I'll be able to hang once I get some decent power.
BTW: Thanks for everyones help and support this season, especially David and Dan. It's a great feeling to know when your having problems people are always there to help you out. ECHC rocks!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hunter »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well? how did the track test go?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hunter »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well? how did the track test go?</TD></TR></TABLE>
It seemed to hold up well, i spun in practice over the inside curbing in turn 5 and it still looks the same.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Scot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">stolen from a different thread...... i think he likes the splitter....
He added some monster brakes too..... they flat spotted his 20 minute old $200 hoosier in about 2 seconds.... ahah....seems like the combo is working
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Make that two, $200 hoosiers.
It seemed to hold up well, i spun in practice over the inside curbing in turn 5 and it still looks the same.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Scot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">stolen from a different thread...... i think he likes the splitter....

He added some monster brakes too..... they flat spotted his 20 minute old $200 hoosier in about 2 seconds.... ahah....seems like the combo is working
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Make that two, $200 hoosiers.



