Hey I just dyno'ed my all stock 06 and I made 211hp!!!

How is that compaired to other stock S2K's

I'm pretty happy tho.

 

what kind of dyno?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nishant &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what kind of dyno?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Dyno Jet- is that a good dyno?.....nevertheless it's the closest one I can get to.

 

nice #'s for a dynojet

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nishant &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what kind of dyno?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Man, it's written on the side of the dyno drum in the pic

Dynojets are pretty standard. Whats a normal AP2 # cause I am wondering if the '06 makes a slight bit more power with all it's DBW changes.

 

ranges between 190-210whp for stock

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Asahi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cause I am wondering if the '06 makes a slight bit more power with all it's DBW changes.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Which is an odd thought because the rated HP went down to 237 for the 05+; down from the original 240 in 04 and below model years.

 

it went down to 237 because honda uses the SAE system for rating hp. Most manufactures still rate the old way.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScreaminTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Which is an odd thought because the rated HP went down to 237 for the 05+; down from the original 240 in 04 and below model years.</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah but thats at the fly wheel, not the wheels.

nice # for stock.

 

There are different kinds of dyno's??? Whats the difference in all of the different kinds...

 

Mustang, Dynojet, Dyno pack.

 

There are different kinds of dyno's??? Whats the difference in all of the different kinds...

mustang and dynojet are consistantly different by like 10 hp i think or 15% so to answer the question we would know if it was a high or low #...but great burn about the name on the barrel.

i believe there is some legislation going through, not sure if its effective yet but it will change the way manufacturers come up with there numbers...because theyre still using formulas based on cars from the 1970's...this could explain the rise or fall of hp on the sticker also. most manufacturers lie up about hp output, apparently its very common, but honda is dead on with the s2k numbers it puts on the sticker

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScreaminTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Which is an odd thought because the rated HP went down to 237 for the 05+; down from the original 240 in 04 and below model years.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Don't neglect that this was due to the way HP was measured not the engine. Now look at the TL that had zero engine changes and lost 12 hp based on the new rating and the TSX that had significant changes estimated at 10-15 hp that netted only 5. A loss of 3 hp in te new rate could (or might not) mean a slight hp bump over previous years. It's like trying to compare Dynojet to Mustang Dyno numbers. We can estimate and speculate but until we do head to head comparisons we won't know.

And don't forget the Dyno Dynamics brand dyno as well. Similar numbers to a Mustang Dyno.

 

For example, when the new TL was first released, it was said to have 270hp. Now under the new system, its rated at 258hp. That number should be correct whereas the previous is a bit inflated

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mykcuz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mustang and dynojet are consistantly different by like 10 hp i think or 15% so to answer the question we would know if it was a high or low #...but great burn about the name on the barrel.</TD></TR></TABLE>
And the Dyno-pack generally reads 10-15hp higher than a dynojet. For the dyno-pack, the wheels are removed and the dyno attaches directly to the hub.

 

correction factor?

 

HMMMM... so mustang is the one that reads the lowest horsepower... GREAT, thats the one I have access to!!! DAMN

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hot_kenneth_hot &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">HMMMM... so mustang is the one that reads the lowest horsepower... GREAT, thats the one I have access to!!! DAMN </TD></TR></TABLE>

What does it matter. Compare apples to apples or mustangs to mustangs and your car makes as much power as anyones. It isn't like the car has less power because the dyno reads lower.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Asahi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

What does it matter. Compare apples to apples or mustangs to mustangs and your car makes as much power as anyones. It isn't like the car has less power because the dyno reads lower.</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's the ticket! Next thing is bolt-on's and re-Dyno at the same dyno....that will give me a more accurate reading on HP gains. Stay tuned!

 

I never got how the Dynos are different. How is a buttdyno different from dynojet, dyna pack and mustang?

 

my first guess is that when you remove the wheels to connect to the hub you are removing weight, and weight in rolling motion on the wheels has a drastic impact the car doesnt need the extra hp to throw 17 or 18 inch rubber and metal around, just a 5 inch hub with no weight really.

 

 

my stock 04 made 210.88whp. u aint special.

 

 

slap on some ap1 rims and i'll bet you'll gain another 3-6 hp.