SOHC torque specs
60ft/lb with moly.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHCboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2? </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHCboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2? </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93supercoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also, can I use my GSR headstuds in my y8?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You wish.
Although I guess you could whittle then down to 10mm and they'd fit.
You wish.
Although I guess you could whittle then down to 10mm and they'd fit.
I personally torque them to 75ft/lbs w/ARP moly lube. Everybody seems to have their own preference though.
Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
id like to know as well.
</TD></TR></TABLE>id like to know as well.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I really like the ZEX cam. Better midrange and top-end. I run stock valvetrain and rev to 7500rpm.
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMkrew_1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"</TD></TR></TABLE>
true that homie! my bad for the false statement. Was a long night
duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"</TD></TR></TABLE>
true that homie! my bad for the false statement. Was a long night
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1995Civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
</TD></TR></TABLE>
the zex valespring upgrade will do just fine
</TD></TR></TABLE>the zex valespring upgrade will do just fine
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





