SOHC torque specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #1  
SOHCboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: char, nc, us
Default SOHC torque specs

i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
93supercoupe's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
From: Dont Steal My Car, Ct, USA
Default Re: SOHC torque specs (SOHCboost)

Also, can I use my GSR headstuds in my y8?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #3  
tilt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX, usa
Default Re: SOHC torque specs (SOHCboost)

60ft/lb with moly.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHCboost &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i got sum ARp head studs wat should i torque 2? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #4  
EnzoSpeed's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 1
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Default Re: SOHC torque specs (93supercoupe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93supercoupe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also, can I use my GSR headstuds in my y8?</TD></TR></TABLE>

You wish.

Although I guess you could whittle then down to 10mm and they'd fit.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 10:53 PM
  #5  
JFK78's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 1
From: SpeedFactory, WA
Default Re: SOHC torque specs (SOHCboost)

I personally torque them to 75ft/lbs w/ARP moly lube. Everybody seems to have their own preference though.

Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #6  
nerdsports's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,401
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default Re: SOHC torque specs (JFK78)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do you mind giving details on your R.I.P. setup that went 12.1 @ 112? </TD></TR></TABLE>

id like to know as well.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
SOHCboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: char, nc, us
Default

haha..... stock z6 12 lbs launch at 7200 rpm on big slicks..
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #8  
SOHCboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: char, nc, us
Default Re: (SOHCboost)

by the way how do like the zex cam in ur car... did u upgrade valve terian?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
JFK78's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 1
From: SpeedFactory, WA
Default Re: (SOHCboost)

I really like the ZEX cam. Better midrange and top-end. I run stock valvetrain and rev to 7500rpm.

Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #10  
1995Civic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
From: 239, FL
Default Re: (JFK78)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JFK78 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I really like the ZEX cam. Better midrange and top-end. I run stock valvetrain and rev to 7500rpm.

Your setup: What size turbo, injectors, slicks? How did it blow?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #11  
AMkrew_1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: ridgecrest, ca
Default Re: (1995Civic)

duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 06:28 PM
  #12  
1995Civic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,753
Likes: 0
From: 239, FL
Default Re: (AMkrew_1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMkrew_1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> duh. the cam is meant to lift the valves...
you probably meant "without the valvespring upgrade, the higher ramprate, and lift on the zex cam could induce valve-float at higher rpm"</TD></TR></TABLE>

true that homie! my bad for the false statement. Was a long night
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #13  
SOHC_MShue's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,440
Likes: 2
From: Richmond, Va, usa
Default Re: (1995Civic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1995Civic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Zex 59300 cam is great, especially for boost applications. I wouldnt recommend running stock valvetrain with it though, because of the higher lift could cause lifting of the valves. When upgrading, i would definitely go with the Crower Springs/Ti-retainers </TD></TR></TABLE>
the zex valespring upgrade will do just fine
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IA95civicDX
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
Jun 18, 2007 08:51 AM
lx-sedan
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
8
Jun 24, 2006 05:31 AM
DC2 Mang
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
11
May 11, 2006 05:29 AM
92ehatch
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
8
Oct 7, 2005 04:19 PM
RyanEJ8
Forced Induction
35
Mar 24, 2005 06:19 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 AM.