Poll Ls Turbo
LS was not meant to rev, i think the best choice would be skunk2.
Also - ARP head studs and rod bolts are suggested for those higher revs...
[Modified by Outkast, 10:14 PM 1/31/2003]
LS was not meant to rev, i think the best choice would be skunk2.
Incorrect, with a Z10 block girdle and a balanced bottom end the motor will rev just as relieable as any Vtec motor. I would suggest a sheetmetal intake manifold.. that gets my vote...
Also - ARP head studs and rod bolts are suggested for those higher revs...
[Modified by Outkast, 10:14 PM 1/31/2003]
Incorrect, with a Z10 block girdle and a balanced bottom end the motor will rev just as relieable as any Vtec motor. I would suggest a sheetmetal intake manifold.. that gets my vote...
Also - ARP head studs and rod bolts are suggested for those higher revs...
[Modified by Outkast, 10:14 PM 1/31/2003]
That victorX manifold is the most disgusting manifold I've ever seen.
A turbo likes a huge plenum. Usally about 1.5 times the size of the motors displacement. It also likes shortish runners that aren't too big in dia. Plenums with walls that at face eachother, like the VictorX, are bad because a resonance is created between the walls. An irregular shape is good for elimating the possibility that the reverberation created by the motor's revving would disturb air flow.
A type R manifold would be pretty damn good. Doesn't some company make a copy that has the correct bolt pattern for the LS? I can't remember who right now.
A turbo likes a huge plenum. Usally about 1.5 times the size of the motors displacement. It also likes shortish runners that aren't too big in dia. Plenums with walls that at face eachother, like the VictorX, are bad because a resonance is created between the walls. An irregular shape is good for elimating the possibility that the reverberation created by the motor's revving would disturb air flow.
A type R manifold would be pretty damn good. Doesn't some company make a copy that has the correct bolt pattern for the LS? I can't remember who right now.
LS was not meant to rev, i think the best choice would be skunk2.
I've got a skunk2 on my setup and think it's the shizzle y0!

[Modified by Speed PHreak, 12:28 AM 2/1/2003]
Trending Topics
<--Ran 13.1@107mph 2days after I blew the motor
Bone Stock b18b
with Fuel setup only
17psi street tires
ended up in 6th place.
Lost to karl 2nd round
May 12th at MIR 2002
Bone Stock b18b
with Fuel setup only
17psi street tires
ended up in 6th place.
Lost to karl 2nd round
May 12th at MIR 2002
Is an LS supercharged reliable? and will it make at least 200whp.. I was rounding up turbo parts, but just too much of a hassle to get all the parts piece by piece. I'm gonna save up for a full jackson racing supercharger kit, cuz i want instant boost and I care about my engine. I know turbo guys blow **** up, (not all the time with proper maintenence) and i just want at least 200whp..
don't flame please, I love Turbo to death, but just can't afford to lose my a/c or live paycheck to paycheck.. lol
don't flame please, I love Turbo to death, but just can't afford to lose my a/c or live paycheck to paycheck.. lol
yes a LS engine with a Si or type-r supercharger kit will work just fine. you will have to modify the intake manifold which we can do for you. With the larger blower it will make 200@the wheels @9psi or so. Teamklr.com. We have a ls motor in a 92 hatch the motor had over 200,000 miles on it and it ran an 8.80 on street tires in the 1/8th mile. Pretty sweet huh
I'm gonna save up for a full jackson racing supercharger kit, cuz i want instant boost and I care about my engine. I know turbo guys blow **** up, (not all the time with proper maintenence) and i just want at least 200whp..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
K i l l a B e e.
Forced Induction
4
Nov 15, 2007 10:33 AM





