Johnny racecar intercooler
09-10-2007, 04:47 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Guilford, Maine, USA
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Johnny racecar intercooler
Im not 100% sure that this is the pace to post this but of all the different forums I thought this one was the most suitable. I want to know where I can get a johnny race car inter-cooler and roughly how much one would run me. And I would take any suggestions that people may have on an inter-cooler for my DA. Thanks
09-10-2007, 05:47 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
9 Posts
Re: (turb20_vtec)
sucks they arent made anymore. ive run a few of them over the past few years. they work good for moderate setups but im glad ive upgraded to my spearco
09-11-2007, 05:52 AM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Guilford, Maine, USA
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Johnny racecar intercooler (wernhersey)
Thats a bummer. Can anyone tell me what to look for in an intercooler other than the obvious. I have never purchased an IC and im not really sure what to look out for. Thanks
Trending Topics
09-11-2007, 10:04 AM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fl
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (fmfkid250)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fmfkid250 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I maxed one out at 443hp
they are good for less the 350hp
</TD></TR></TABLE>
So your saying the precision 350hp intercooler is not capable of cooling and/or flowing enough for 350hp as advertised, or that you took your precision intercooler past 350hp to 443 and that was the most its good for and therefore underated?
they are good for less the 350hp
</TD></TR></TABLE>
So your saying the precision 350hp intercooler is not capable of cooling and/or flowing enough for 350hp as advertised, or that you took your precision intercooler past 350hp to 443 and that was the most its good for and therefore underated?
09-11-2007, 10:49 AM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: "It's Miley" Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (OLD_HATCH)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by OLD_HATCH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
So your saying the precision 350hp intercooler is not capable of cooling and/or flowing enough for 350hp as advertised, or that you took your precision intercooler past 350hp to 443 and that was the most its good for and therefore underated?</TD></TR></TABLE>
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...
So your saying the precision 350hp intercooler is not capable of cooling and/or flowing enough for 350hp as advertised, or that you took your precision intercooler past 350hp to 443 and that was the most its good for and therefore underated?</TD></TR></TABLE>
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...
09-11-2007, 11:25 AM
#11
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nashville, TN, U.S.A
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (powerdbygarrett)
I found the JRC design to be quite restricting. I "upgraded" to an e-bay 27" IC and actually notice BETTER spool up time and obviously better cooling. I could barely see through my JRC, but the newer ebay one I could.
It's a poor design as well since it's better to have short and fat rather then long and skinny like the JRC. E-bay ones are cheaper too. Just giving my 2 cents
It's a poor design as well since it's better to have short and fat rather then long and skinny like the JRC. E-bay ones are cheaper too. Just giving my 2 cents
09-11-2007, 12:32 PM
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (adseguy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by adseguy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I found the JRC design to be quite restricting. I "upgraded" to an e-bay 27" IC and actually notice BETTER spool up time and obviously better cooling. I could barely see through my JRC, but the newer ebay one I could.
It's a poor design as well since it's better to have short and fat rather then long and skinny like the JRC. E-bay ones are cheaper too. Just giving my 2 cents</TD></TR></TABLE>
good to know.......i may upgrade my 8" JRC in the future too.....
It's a poor design as well since it's better to have short and fat rather then long and skinny like the JRC. E-bay ones are cheaper too. Just giving my 2 cents</TD></TR></TABLE>
good to know.......i may upgrade my 8" JRC in the future too.....
09-11-2007, 02:55 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fl
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (fmfkid250)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fmfkid250 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oops...Sorry The person that posted right before you mentioned presicion and I ***-umed you were refering to precision not jrc.
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oops...Sorry The person that posted right before you mentioned presicion and I ***-umed you were refering to precision not jrc.
09-11-2007, 07:11 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (fmfkid250)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fmfkid250 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...</TD></TR></TABLE>
What else was changed on the setup? There is no way at those low power levels you noticed this much of a difference with 10PSI less.
-platinum.
WTF We are talking about JRC not Precision...It wasent really a problem of cooling but Flowing. I went from a JRC 8" IC 443 @30psi to a Precision 650hp ic it made 480@20psi....
It just could not flow the CFM i was trying to make it flow...</TD></TR></TABLE>
What else was changed on the setup? There is no way at those low power levels you noticed this much of a difference with 10PSI less.
-platinum.
09-12-2007, 06:18 AM
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: "It's Miley" Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (platinum00)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by platinum00 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What else was changed on the setup? There is no way at those low power levels you noticed this much of a difference with 10PSI less.
-platinum.</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2079629
What else was changed on the setup? There is no way at those low power levels you noticed this much of a difference with 10PSI less.
-platinum.</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2079629
09-12-2007, 08:07 AM
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Yay Area, CA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just my 2 cents I believe the BAR and PLATE designs are better overall vs. the fin design. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
That was what I was looking for when I was IC searching.
Good luck.
That was what I was looking for when I was IC searching.
Good luck.
09-12-2007, 09:48 AM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (fmfkid250)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fmfkid250 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2079629
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks... Was this the older style JRC?. I made 424@26psi with ~3psi drop on a small SC50 .48. I guess it might be difference from D to B.
interesting none the less...
-platinum
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=2079629
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks... Was this the older style JRC?. I made 424@26psi with ~3psi drop on a small SC50 .48. I guess it might be difference from D to B.
interesting none the less...
-platinum
