GT40R w/H22
03-23-2006, 06:57 AM
#2
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: GT40R w/H22 (kamAccord)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kamAccord »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What size inter cooler piping shoult be used with a built H22 and GT40R turbo? Thanks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I saw good results from swapping up to 3" piping and a 70mm TB from 2.5" piping and a 65mm TB. We had made 711whp 35psi BUT couldn't get any richer than 10.8:1 on the dyno, we called Tony1 and he said to try the 3" piping and 70mm TB we had and voila car made 714whp with only 32psi after that change
I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. 
Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!
I saw good results from swapping up to 3" piping and a 70mm TB from 2.5" piping and a 65mm TB. We had made 711whp 35psi BUT couldn't get any richer than 10.8:1 on the dyno, we called Tony1 and he said to try the 3" piping and 70mm TB we had and voila car made 714whp with only 32psi after that change
I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!
03-25-2006, 08:07 AM
#6
Shooting Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Lou, MO, US
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmmm...i would have not thought that 3" pipe would make that much of a difference... and 3" will not allow boost to build as quick if your running lower boost settings...
03-26-2006, 10:15 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (vtecspeed1320)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtecspeed1320 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmmm...i would have not thought that 3" pipe would make that much of a difference... and 3" will not allow boost to build as quick if your running lower boost settings...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why is that?
Why is that?
Trending Topics
03-26-2006, 10:22 AM
#8
Re: (vtecspeed1320)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtecspeed1320 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmmm...i would have not thought that 3" pipe would make that much of a difference... and 3" will not allow boost to build as quick if your running lower boost settings...</TD></TR></TABLE>
I always heard that too, same with trying to make the intercooler piping as short as possible.
I don't believe it anymore after moving the intercooler in a friends car from behind the bumper to in the back seat, along with 4" piping instead of 3" piping and seeing zero change in spool.
I always heard that too, same with trying to make the intercooler piping as short as possible.
I don't believe it anymore after moving the intercooler in a friends car from behind the bumper to in the back seat, along with 4" piping instead of 3" piping and seeing zero change in spool.
03-26-2006, 02:37 PM
#9
Shooting Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Lou, MO, US
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (boosted92)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I always heard that too, same with trying to make the intercooler piping as short as possible.
I don't believe it anymore after moving the intercooler in a friends car from behind the bumper to in the back seat, along with 4" piping instead of 3" piping and seeing zero change in spool.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What in the back seat?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kamAccord »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why is that?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Harder to fill a bigger amount of space with smaller turbos from a 2.5 in to a 3in piping...thats just what I hear. Could just be hearsay or bullshit.
I don't believe it anymore after moving the intercooler in a friends car from behind the bumper to in the back seat, along with 4" piping instead of 3" piping and seeing zero change in spool.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What in the back seat?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kamAccord »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why is that?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Harder to fill a bigger amount of space with smaller turbos from a 2.5 in to a 3in piping...thats just what I hear. Could just be hearsay or bullshit.
03-26-2006, 03:17 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40R w/H22 (Boostfed.com)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I saw good results from swapping up to 3" piping and a 70mm TB from 2.5" piping and a 65mm TB. We had made 711whp 35psi BUT couldn't get any richer than 10.8:1 on the dyno, we called Tony1 and he said to try the 3" piping and 70mm TB we had and voila car made 714whp with only 32psi after that change I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!</TD></TR></TABLE>
03-30-2006, 01:14 AM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: GT40R w/H22 (Boostfed.com)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I saw good results from swapping up to 3" piping and a 70mm TB from 2.5" piping and a 65mm TB. We had made 711whp 35psi BUT couldn't get any richer than 10.8:1 on the dyno, we called Tony1 and he said to try the 3" piping and 70mm TB we had and voila car made 714whp with only 32psi after that change I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks fornthe info.
I saw good results from swapping up to 3" piping and a 70mm TB from 2.5" piping and a 65mm TB. We had made 711whp 35psi BUT couldn't get any richer than 10.8:1 on the dyno, we called Tony1 and he said to try the 3" piping and 70mm TB we had and voila car made 714whp with only 32psi after that change
I believe Tony mentioned he felt anything above 350-400whp will benefit from the 3" piping. Again it was his opinion he stated and not a tested fact, he has given me his gut feelings before and they always seem to work. Tony1 for all teh help over the years man!</TD></TR></TABLE>Thanks fornthe info.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
