flywheel weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #26  
streetracer6rpt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
From: in the shadows
Default Re: flywheel weight

https://honda-tech.com/forums/showth...2499105&page=2
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #27  
4drEF's Avatar
Keyboard Humorist
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,814
Likes: 11
From: Granada Hills, Ca, USA
Default Re: flywheel weight

Originally Posted by GoHybrid
i wonder: what if you used a slightly heavier flywheel and had some method of electromechanical control to declutch the flywheel and re-engage it at a more desirable time?

So, say you spend the energy to spin a 20lb flywheel up to 7000rpm and then shift. When you declutch the transmission, the friction and pumping losses in the engine cause it to slow down. When you release the clutch and engage the new gear, you've lost a thousand rpms or more.

What if, instead, the flywheel declutches from the motor at the same time as the transmission clutch? The crankshaft can freewheel within the flywheel hub and has effectively lost 20lbs of rotating mass, so revs fall quickly, BUT the flywheel is still spinning and losing energy at a slower rate. So instead of losing that flywheel inertia to engine losses, you re-engage the flywheel once the new gear is selected and you get a small boost of power as the flywheel energy is dumped back into the drivetrain. You could even add flywheel energy by capturing energy during engine braking.

I've seen the concept before but in the form of a spinning armature used to capture energy during braking, and used to generate current for an electrical motor upon acceleration. This idea would be more mechanically rooted.

I don't know... just pie in the sky but this thread made me think of that possibility.
Sounds like a lot it might create gear loading issues in the transmission.
I would expect broken tranny parts.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #28  
ll3o0sTeD's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: @ 20psi
Default Re: flywheel weight

Originally Posted by The sweed
I like the one pice flywheels in cromoly..


i have a 8lb chromoly wheel and its fine for me....i have a garrett t3 42/48 on 15psi...and i have no prob loosing boost between shifts....**** i can get a good third gear scratch to
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #29  
Bailhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 1
From: ME
Default Re: flywheel weight

You already have the heaviest stock crank and you added heavier rods and pistons. I think the lighter flywheel is a good idea.

I run an itr flywheel right now and it wasn't even noticable compared to the b16 one. My ACT forged chromoly (8lb i think?) is going in soon to help counteract new rods and pistons and a longer stroke crank.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #30  
4drEF's Avatar
Keyboard Humorist
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,814
Likes: 11
From: Granada Hills, Ca, USA
Default Re: flywheel weight

Originally Posted by Bailhatch
You already have the heaviest stock crank and you added heavier rods and pistons. I think the lighter flywheel is a good idea.

I run an itr flywheel right now and it wasn't even noticable compared to the b16 one. My ACT forged chromoly (8lb i think?) is going in soon to help counteract new rods and pistons and a longer stroke crank.
Heavier rods and pistons aren't rotating mass and don't add to the rotating mass inertia.
The crank does, but it's probably negated by the rods and pistons.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #31  
Bailhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 1
From: ME
Default Re: flywheel weight

I didn't say rotating mass. They weigh more than stock, so they take more energy to move. I don't see how they would be cancled out by a heavier crank. Adding weight to any moving engine part is using power that could go to the wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #32  
jeryjohn's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Gibraltar, Gibraltar, Gibraltar
Default Re: flywheel weight

Originally Posted by GoHybrid
i wonder: what if you used a slightly heavier flywheel and had some method of electromechanical control to declutch the flywheel and re-engage it at a more desirable time?

So, say you spend the energy to spin a 20lb flywheel up to 7000rpm and then shift. When you declutch the transmission, the friction and pumping losses in the engine cause it to slow down. When you release the clutch and engage the new gear, you've lost a thousand rpms or more.

What if, instead, the flywheel declutches from the motor at the same time as the transmission clutch? The crankshaft can freewheel within the flywheel hub and has effectively lost 20lbs of rotating mass, so revs fall quickly, BUT the flywheel is still spinning and losing energy at a slower rate. So instead of losing that flywheel inertia to engine losses, you re-engage the flywheel once the new gear is selected and you get a small boost of power as the flywheel energy is dumped back into the drivetrain. You could even add flywheel energy by capturing energy during engine braking.

I've seen the concept before but in the form of a spinning armature used to capture energy during braking, and used to generate current for an electrical motor upon acceleration. This idea would be more mechanically rooted.

I don't know... just pie in the sky but this thread made me think of that possibility.
some f1 cars used this system called the KERS system Kinetic Energy Return System....erm system petty cool but the mass required is substantially higher than that of typical flywheel!(
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #33  
S2Integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 757
Likes: 2
From: NW Ohio
Default Re: flywheel weight

just get it balanced, great idea for engine response on an NA, not really needed with high torque from boosted motor.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EJ8_Man
Honda CR-V & Element
2
Dec 6, 2015 03:42 AM
ajbucci
Tech / Misc
3
May 20, 2006 09:39 AM
Clabbe
Acura Integra Type-R
3
Oct 18, 2005 08:22 AM
the.hamburglar
Acura Integra
8
Mar 20, 2005 04:35 PM
Spoold_R
Acura Integra Type-R
10
Jan 1, 2002 07:54 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 AM.