engine build ls/vtec sc61?
ive done some research and now im trying to decide if the engine combo ive thought about would make good power and decent spool time.i have one question tho im waiting to here back from cp piston because i noticed the 9.7:1 comp pistons dont come in 81.5mm bore size? i figured to use a little higher compression because im going to be using a sc61.
reason why i want 81.5mm is room for error also that the cylinder walls wont be so thin. im shooting for around 400-425 wheel horse. i have a hondata s200 also
b16 head
supertech valvetrain
gsr cams
stock porting
victor mani
havent decided on tb yet
780cc injectors
aeromotive regulator
walbro 255
ls stock sleeves
eagle h beam rods
arp headstuds
i want cp 9.7:1 81.5mm but i dont know if they make them
sc61 with 63. ar exhaust housing v band
3inch turbo back exhaust
custom ramhorn header(my buddy is certified tig welder and went to school for fabricating)
im figuring that the sc61 wont have the best spool time but it is a fwd car and if you are getting full boost at say anything lower then 5000rpm your going to be burning tire everywhere.
reason why i want 81.5mm is room for error also that the cylinder walls wont be so thin. im shooting for around 400-425 wheel horse. i have a hondata s200 also
b16 head
supertech valvetrain
gsr cams
stock porting
victor mani
havent decided on tb yet
780cc injectors
aeromotive regulator
walbro 255
ls stock sleeves
eagle h beam rods
arp headstuds
i want cp 9.7:1 81.5mm but i dont know if they make them
sc61 with 63. ar exhaust housing v band
3inch turbo back exhaust
custom ramhorn header(my buddy is certified tig welder and went to school for fabricating)
im figuring that the sc61 wont have the best spool time but it is a fwd car and if you are getting full boost at say anything lower then 5000rpm your going to be burning tire everywhere.
i got off the phone with cp, they dont make that piston.... he did say that they are able to make custom pistons about $118 each. i was looking through there catolog and they make 81.5mm gsr pistons 9.8 compression. those would work in my setup up correct?
the compression ratio as long as your high 9's low 10's then it doesnt matter. you dont want anythign lower than a mid 9:1. the sc61 will do well but is a little over the top for 400whp. sc61 is a 600+hp turbo
57 or 60 trim with a .63 hotside is where you want to be with your setup. The gsr cam will make nice power with either choice and the .63 works well on a gsr cam. If you were going with a ctr/itr cam or something larger then i would say a .82 hotside and more rpms.
57 or 60 trim with a .63 hotside is where you want to be with your setup. The gsr cam will make nice power with either choice and the .63 works well on a gsr cam. If you were going with a ctr/itr cam or something larger then i would say a .82 hotside and more rpms.
down the road i want to build a sleeved block and achieve more horse so i dont want to short myself by having to buy another turbo. i realize it will be a little laggy but when it does spool u will know it. another question what do you think would be a safe redline for this setup? the lower end will be balanced and blue printed.
john
john
Trending Topics
john
"spool" will not be "quicker" due to cams alone. This is where more stroke accompanied w/ bore comes into play. The cams help more with top end power. Think about it, you have 61mm inducer turbocharger on a sub-3.0 litre car. It's going to reach maximum pressure rather late in the rpm band (over 4500rpms). Deal with it..
im problay going to stay with 81.5, would .5mm even make a difference. and what do you guys think of that tb http://www.go-autoworks-store.com/prprthbo.html ? any1 ever have any expirence with it?
What I'm saying is NO. a couple of mllimeters of bore isn't going to change anything. At that point you might as well stay 81.5mm or so. There's more to creating displacement w/ additional bore. Like I said, as a sub 3 litre engine displacement, maximum pressure will still not be reached until about 4500rpms with that turbocharger.
What I'm saying is NO. a couple of mllimeters of bore isn't going to change anything. At that point you might as well stay 81.5mm or so. There's more to creating displacement w/ additional bore. Like I said, as a sub 3 litre engine displacement, maximum pressure will still not be reached until about 4500rpms with that turbocharger.
why i should go with pistons with compression higher to 10 is because the charger im going to use is bigger, and with higher comp pistons it will help it spool better? only reason why i ask is because ive seen alot of builds with comp about 9.1. correct me if im wrong
There's more to a turbocharged car than the turbocharger. The higher static compression helps with your acceleration rate OUTSIDE of positive boost pressure, since it will get to your effective compression a bit faster than at 9.0:1. The double side of that is to make sure that your tuning is done by a professional, and not just "a friend that knows how to change the numbers on the laptop".
Changing the cams out to ITR/CTR will net more power. If my goal was to make 400hp I would rather make it on say 15psi instead of 18psi. ITR cams will make it run more efficient thus make more power but like The Shodan said, it will not make much of a difference at all in spool. I picked up an SC61 as well but I've had a 60trim for the past 2 years and it made 425whp on pump gas which is more than enough for the street and 475whp on 112oct. The SC61 had been boxed up in a closet for almost 4 months now because I just love the power and spool of the 60trim. I just decided to slap on the SC61 because I want to go faster in the 1/4 mile otherwise the 60trim is perfect.



