better tranny for boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #1  
Lightning Orders's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,417
Likes: 0
From: SEND IMs to Lightning :-)
Default better tranny for boost

Gsr or Ls?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #2  
ricodemus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 0
Default Re: better tranny for boost (delsolLs-t)

tighter gearing will always lead to better acceleration. So GSR wins over LS. Discrepancies arise when you actually start thinking about your gearing combined with the size of your wheels and what the car is being used for.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
avividmemory's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,209
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, IN
Default Re: better tranny for boost (ricodemus)

tighter gearing will always lead to better acceleration. So GSR wins over LS. Discrepancies arise when you actually start thinking about your gearing combined with the size of your wheels and what the car is being used for.
hit the nail on the head there...only reason i use an LS is cuz it came with the car lol...its good for high mph highway crusing but its slower to accelerate 3/4th gears...
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #4  
Lightning Orders's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,417
Likes: 0
From: SEND IMs to Lightning :-)
Default Re: better tranny for boost (SpoolinLS)

i always thought that the longer gearing was much better for boost since you would stay in boost longer as opposed to constantly shifting and having to respool. but guess i was wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:51 AM
  #5  
jinxproof99's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 0
From: VIRGINIA
Default Re: better tranny for boost (delsolLs-t)

i always thought that the longer gearing was much better for boost since you would stay in boost longer as opposed to constantly shifting and having to respool. but guess i was wrong.
yes, that is wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #6  
ill_take_one's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: Su Fu, SD
Default Re: better tranny for boost (jinxproof99)

Like someone has said on here (donno the name) "i have yet to see a honda that makes more power at 4000 rpms than 5000rpms"

Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:14 AM
  #7  
BoostedGSRBubble's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Where free thought comes to die, US
Default Re: better tranny for boost (ill_take_one)

This has been discussed here in depth at least 10 times. i know, i started one of the posts. Try the SEARCH button in the upper right hand corner. Remember to try recent and archived topics.
Clffs notes: gsr is better than ls, si is better than gsr, and itr is better than si (good old lsd)
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #8  
romeo619romeo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Default Re: better tranny for boost (BoostedGSRBubble)

for turbo .. LS tranny ...
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #9  
ill_take_one's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: Su Fu, SD
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

for turbo .. LS tranny ...
Wild shot in the dark....I'm just guessing you didnt read any of the previous posts?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
jinxproof99's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 0
From: VIRGINIA
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

for turbo .. LS tranny ...

really?? please explain why???


this ought to be interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #11  
boostin b16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Home of the StuNNaZ ... NOVA, usa
Default Re: better tranny for boost (jinxproof99)

for turbo .. LS tranny ...


really?? please explain why???


this ought to be interesting.

let it alone ... its been tried and tested, there is one bad apple in every bunch!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:32 AM
  #12  
romeo619romeo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Default Re: better tranny for boost (boostin b16)

its not the point of making more power.. its more of being constant then losing time at shifts...if a person has to shift less that means.. the times are more constant...plus it wasnt his question of which tranny would put out more power... he said whats better for boost.. im only talking by experience.. ive had a b16 turbo in a crx i could never really get the full boost potential out of my b16 tranny and ive ran my friend with basicly the same set up.. cept that he had a LS tranny in his b16 turbo...and everytime i shift i would always fall behind


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:33 PM 3/13/2003]


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:36 PM 3/13/2003]
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #13  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: better tranny for boost (jinxproof99)

I like the LS tranny for the LS motor; but I prefer to run it w/ at LEAST a 4.40 FD or a 4.785 would be nice. LS tranny is nice for gear spread if u have a wide powerband then use the short fd to keep the gears small.. only for LS/b20 though.

For vtec motors where peak torque is always after 6k u don't want alot of gear spread. U want to keep ur rev's as high as possible. You wan't the closest ratio'd gears and u want the shortest FD that will get u ur top speed. LS tranny is horrible for a vtec motor cause 1) it forces u to spend time below peak torque 2) slaughters acceleration cause it makes the gears long as hell 3) 0.966 4th w/ 4.26fd will allow for 140mph with stock redline on stock tires in 4th gear. talk about only using 3 gears in the 1/4 that would SUCK!
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

its not the point of making more power.. its more of being constant then losing time at shifts...if a person has to shift less that means.. the times are more constant...plus it wasnt his question of which tranny would put out more power... he said whats better for boost.. im only talking by experience.. ive had a b16 turbo in a crx i could never really get the full boost potential out of my b16 tranny and ive ran my friend with basicly the same set up.. cept that he had a LS tranny in his b16 turbo...and everytime i shift i would always fall behind
if u loose more time shifting then u gain by running shorter gears then u arn't shifting fast enough. did u ever think maybe his car MADE MORE POWER?
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:43 AM
  #15  
romeo619romeo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Default Re: better tranny for boost (DIRep)

thats more for N/a set up is what i would think... but its all about tuning...and how the driver likes his car to run when it all come down to it that is...
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #16  
boostin b16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Home of the StuNNaZ ... NOVA, usa
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

its not the point of making more power.. its more of being constant then losing time at shifts...if a person has to shift less that means.. the times are more constant...plus it wasnt his question of which tranny would put out more power... he said whats better for boost.. im only talking by experience.. ive had a b16 turbo in a crx i could never really get the full boost potential out of my b16 tranny and ive ran my friend with basicly the same set up.. cept that he had a LS tranny in his b16 turbo...and everytime i shift i would always fall behind


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:33 PM 3/13/2003]

if you fell behind when you shifted and you did not pull back when he shifted then there are two possibilities here: 1) his car is making more power than yours, or 2) he is a better driver than you!


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:36 PM 3/13/2003]
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #17  
DIRep972's Avatar
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 2
From: Third Coast, united states
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

thats more for N/a set up is what i would think... but its all about tuning...and how the driver likes his car to run when it all come down to it that is...
its not really about tuning. if the driver wants his car to be slow he goes w/ the longest gears. turbo doesn't change things w/ gearing vs. an NA set up. Same rules still apply.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:52 AM
  #18  
romeo619romeo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Default Re: better tranny for boost (DIRep)

correct me if im wrong but shifting = losing time..


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:53 PM 3/13/2003]
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #19  
jinxproof99's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,141
Likes: 0
From: VIRGINIA
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

correct me if im wrong but shifting = losing time..


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:53 PM 3/13/2003]

i am NOT getting involved in another discussion regarding ls tranny vs b16. we have a search button and i suggest that not only "delsolLs-t", the originator of this thread, use it, but "romeo619romeo" should use it(search button)as well.

1. the ls tranny is NEVER better in an NA set up. ever.

2. ls tranny is *** except for top end runs. no one in there right mind would willingly use that tranny for drag racing/street racing. even with a shitty 6800 rev limit you would at the very least change the final drive in the ls tranny.......but i wouldn't even do that. i would get springs and retainers and run a gsr tranny at the very LEAST.

do your homework and you will learn.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
Vu's Avatar
Vu
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: New Iberia, LA, U.S.A.
Default Re: better tranny for boost (romeo619romeo)

correct me if im wrong but shifting = losing time..


[Modified by romeo619romeo, 8:53 PM 3/13/2003]
But if you don't shift, you'll runout of speed. That's like saying if I took off in 2nd or 5th gear, I going to win because I shifted less.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 06:23 PM
  #21  
illi Adik's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
From: Frederick
Default Re: better tranny for boost (delsolLs-t)

I cant believe we are going through this again....
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 06:48 PM
  #22  
ill_take_one's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: Su Fu, SD
Default Re: better tranny for boost (Jackson4Door)

I cant believe we are going through this again....
Its a never ending battle. It'll go on, til the end of time.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 07:24 PM
  #23  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: better tranny for boost (ill_take_one)

Like someone has said on here (donno the name) "i have yet to see a honda that makes more power at 4000 rpms than 5000rpms"

that someone was me....
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 07:28 PM
  #24  
done's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 0
From: www.js-garage.com
Default Re: better tranny for boost (tony1)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=421083

Reply
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #25  
93LSivic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 1
From: All around, De/Pa
Default Re: better tranny for boost (delsolLs-t)

This has been beat harder than a life sentenced prisoners pud.....I hate seeing it every month---WTF!!

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 AM.