is any one using and liking
I've got a dx tranny on my d16z6 and i am going to be boosted very soon, I know that a ex/si trans will provide better acceleration but can I get away with using the dx for awhile or is it just going to suck *** with that long of gears? is or has anyone used or using this tranny w/ boost and like it? I need to figure this out before I throw the snail under my hood, any experience would be greatly appriciated
Thanks a bunch
Thanks a bunch
I've been in the same car with both Si and Dx trannies. Both seem to be about the same, I thought for sure the Dx would be slower, but the Si spins second where the Dx has alot more tractions. Either way I don't think your going to feel a big difference.
I have ran both and definately did not like the dx tranny. Fist and second on the dx were okay and did not spin as easily but after 3rd and 4th gear on the dx tranny the car felt so slow. The ex tranny keeps pulling a lot harder in 3rd and 4th gear.
Trending Topics
Yes, the ex/si tranny is shorter then the dx/cx one. Like I said, I personally didn't notice the difference between the ex/si tranny and the Dx one. But it's been said numerous times on here that any engine that likes to rev, needs teh shorts gears possible, no matter if it's FI and NA. So if possible, get/fix the EX/Si tranny.
running the dx for a couple months now as a temp and i'm about to throw in my ex/si after i get a new clutch. the dx falls on its face after first and second. you'll especially notice it at the track. it's nice for highway cruising tho.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nerologic
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
12
May 21, 2003 11:08 PM
serious
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
14
Jul 17, 2002 03:31 AM
chrisir19
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
25
Jun 23, 2002 02:12 PM
xXx Justin xXx
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
21
May 17, 2002 03:37 AM



