Notices
Engine Management and Tuning Crome, NepTune, Hondata, AEM, MOTEC

Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2010, 02:53 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
elprovos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Barbados
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

First time tuner here with a question about timing. I'm using Neptune tuning my D15B. I recreated a basemap to increase the resolution and I've got the AFs pretty much dialed in on the low cam. My question is about Table Ignition vs. Actual Ignition.

From my datalogging i can see that actual ignition exceeds table ignition by about 3 degrees and as much as 5degrees at almost all loads levels. Do I increase my table values to match actual or do i increase my table values [to match or exceed current actual] in certain areas to increase power?
Old 10-11-2010, 03:39 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HRTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

You tune normally as you would on any other system. You're just now seeing what the stock ECU actually does with the table timing and adjustments.
Old 10-11-2010, 04:02 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
elprovos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Barbados
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

hmmm, ok, so even if i alter the values, the ecu will always adjust based on what ever conditions exist. I do have the box checked in Parameters ->main -> options -> Ignition adjustments.
Old 10-11-2010, 04:18 PM
  #4  
iTrader: (2)
 
93turbo16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Carlisle, Pa, USA
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

Originally Posted by elprovos
hmmm, ok, so even if i alter the values, the ecu will always adjust based on what ever conditions exist. I do have the box checked in Parameters ->main -> options -> Ignition adjustments.
There is a background ignition adjustment going on with the stock ECU. NepTune gives you access to this table in the Ignition Dwell section in the parameters section of NepTune RTP.

This will give you the values that are added to the table timing as the RPM increases.

So I wouldn't worry about the table vs ignition difference when tuning. It is there stock, NepTune just gives you access to the underlying rpm dwell.
Old 02-10-2011, 08:42 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dellas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

So when you disable ignition adjustments in Neptune, does it ignore the ignition advance vs RPM in the dwell control section or are there other underlying adjustments getting turned off(I know it doesn't turn off IAT and ECT adjustments)?

If I disable ignition adjustments will it output table values + (IAT & ECT) only like a true standalone would?

I haven't started to mess with those features yet, just want to get a clear picture as to what is actually happening with the stock code and how Neptune handles it before I start using these features.
Old 02-10-2011, 09:16 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HRTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

Table + ECT + IAT + gear based.
Old 02-10-2011, 09:51 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dellas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

Originally Posted by HRTuning
Table + ECT + IAT + gear based.
Ok, great.

So it does ignore the ignition advance vs rpm in the dwell section.

Would zeroing out all ignition advance vs rpm in the dwell section output the same Table + ECT + IAT + gear based?

Correct me if I'm wrong but based on my understanding now it would.
Old 02-10-2011, 10:16 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HRTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

No, I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion.
Old 02-10-2011, 10:34 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
dellas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

Originally Posted by HRTuning
No, I'm not sure how you reached that conclusion.
Ok got you.... It's alot more clear to me now..

Thanks JR..
Old 02-10-2011, 10:35 AM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HRTuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing

No prob.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hmtcrxsir
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
04-03-2017 05:53 AM
jdmb16ef8
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
05-04-2008 04:47 AM
type B16
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
09-09-2006 12:13 AM
the.hamburglar
Tech / Misc
18
10-14-2004 11:37 AM
integrx
Acura Integra
1
01-15-2004 11:37 PM



Quick Reply: Question about Actual Timing versus Table Timing



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:28 AM.