Twin scroll top mount question
For a twin scroll top mount manifold I assume it matters which exhaust ports are mated up. If so my question is which ports need to be mated is it (1&4 2&3) Is this correct? Are there other options? Any PICS?
Thanks
Thanks
Trending Topics
OK so what about using a (non divided manifold) with a turbo such as the S366 or S366XL? Is that even possible? If so would it still proform up to its potential?
If you use a non-divided manny with a divided turbo you will not see the benefits of a divided setup, my friend did it with a 42R setup and said it will be fine and as soon as he got tuned he was complaining about how unresponsive the setup was, after I preached to him for months not to go that route.
Of course its possible, why wouldnt it work? Its a turbo sitting on a manifold.......
You pair whatever pistons that go up and down with each other, in our case its 1-4 & 2-3..... the whole purpose of a divided setup is to have a constant uninterrupted flow of exhaust gas over the turbine wheel, with an open collector all 4 ports just dump into a common area and then they are forced over the turbine wheel, which has not been an issue for decades, but when you are looking for every little bit of power and effeciency you can get... IMO a divided setup is the way to go.
please dont say twin scroll, nobody offers anything twin scroll for our cars to my knowledge even though some companies market their products as such. I am pretty sure their manifolds will work properly with twin scroll turbo's, but I am pretty sure there is no such thing as a twin scroll manifold unless someone has introduced a divided collector that can vary in size by rpm to match a twin scroll turbine housing.
Of course its possible, why wouldnt it work? Its a turbo sitting on a manifold.......
You pair whatever pistons that go up and down with each other, in our case its 1-4 & 2-3..... the whole purpose of a divided setup is to have a constant uninterrupted flow of exhaust gas over the turbine wheel, with an open collector all 4 ports just dump into a common area and then they are forced over the turbine wheel, which has not been an issue for decades, but when you are looking for every little bit of power and effeciency you can get... IMO a divided setup is the way to go.
please dont say twin scroll, nobody offers anything twin scroll for our cars to my knowledge even though some companies market their products as such. I am pretty sure their manifolds will work properly with twin scroll turbo's, but I am pretty sure there is no such thing as a twin scroll manifold unless someone has introduced a divided collector that can vary in size by rpm to match a twin scroll turbine housing.
If you use a non-divided manny with a divided turbo you will not see the benefits of a divided setup, my friend did it with a 42R setup and said it will be fine and as soon as he got tuned he was complaining about how unresponsive the setup was, after I preached to him for months not to go that route.
Of course its possible, why wouldnt it work? Its a turbo sitting on a manifold.......
You pair whatever pistons that go up and down with each other, in our case its 1-4 & 2-3..... the whole purpose of a divided setup is to have a constant uninterrupted flow of exhaust gas over the turbine wheel, with an open collector all 4 ports just dump into a common area and then they are forced over the turbine wheel, which has not been an issue for decades, but when you are looking for every little bit of power and effeciency you can get... IMO a divided setup is the way to go.
please dont say twin scroll, nobody offers anything twin scroll for our cars to my knowledge even though some companies market their products as such. I am pretty sure their manifolds will work properly with twin scroll turbo's, but I am pretty sure there is no such thing as a twin scroll manifold unless someone has introduced a divided collector that can vary in size by rpm to match a twin scroll turbine housing.
Of course its possible, why wouldnt it work? Its a turbo sitting on a manifold.......
You pair whatever pistons that go up and down with each other, in our case its 1-4 & 2-3..... the whole purpose of a divided setup is to have a constant uninterrupted flow of exhaust gas over the turbine wheel, with an open collector all 4 ports just dump into a common area and then they are forced over the turbine wheel, which has not been an issue for decades, but when you are looking for every little bit of power and effeciency you can get... IMO a divided setup is the way to go.
please dont say twin scroll, nobody offers anything twin scroll for our cars to my knowledge even though some companies market their products as such. I am pretty sure their manifolds will work properly with twin scroll turbo's, but I am pretty sure there is no such thing as a twin scroll manifold unless someone has introduced a divided collector that can vary in size by rpm to match a twin scroll turbine housing.
Any divided turbo will work with a non-divided manifold and vice versa, its just pointless to do so. As long as your flanges match (T3 turbo-T3 manny/T4 turbo-T4manny) there is no issue....
Disappointed? What are your goals? Its not like your going to lose 100whp with the mismatch, its just less than ideal and your spool time/transient reponse will suffer.
If you want quality its not going to be cheap, full-race.com IMO makes the best divided stuff I have one and its built with amazing quality.
Disappointed? What are your goals? Its not like your going to lose 100whp with the mismatch, its just less than ideal and your spool time/transient reponse will suffer.
If you want quality its not going to be cheap, full-race.com IMO makes the best divided stuff I have one and its built with amazing quality.
Any divided turbo will work with a non-divided manifold and vice versa, its just pointless to do so. As long as your flanges match (T3 turbo-T3 manny/T4 turbo-T4manny) there is no issue....
Disappointed? What are your goals? Its not like your going to lose 100whp with the mismatch, its just less than ideal and your spool time/transient reponse will suffer.
If you want quality its not going to be cheap, full-race.com IMO makes the best divided stuff I have one and its built with amazing quality.
Disappointed? What are your goals? Its not like your going to lose 100whp with the mismatch, its just less than ideal and your spool time/transient reponse will suffer.
If you want quality its not going to be cheap, full-race.com IMO makes the best divided stuff I have one and its built with amazing quality.
Order off the Taco Bell fresh menu. That stuff is good eatin!
i was under the impression that a divided setup is only good for a street car setup as it givers u better response & spool at lower end power. for a drag car that is not necessary, & the dividers actually take up room making your passages smaller.
i haven't actually tested that fact as far as power wise.
it would be nice to see a test of the exact same turbo with a non divided & divided housing test. would be very easy to do. unless it has been done
i haven't actually tested that fact as far as power wise.
it would be nice to see a test of the exact same turbo with a non divided & divided housing test. would be very easy to do. unless it has been done
i was under the impression that a divided setup is only good for a street car setup as it givers u better response & spool at lower end power. for a drag car that is not necessary, & the dividers actually take up room making your passages smaller.
i haven't actually tested that fact as far as power wise.
it would be nice to see a test of the exact same turbo with a non divided & divided housing test. would be very easy to do. unless it has been done
i haven't actually tested that fact as far as power wise.
it would be nice to see a test of the exact same turbo with a non divided & divided housing test. would be very easy to do. unless it has been done
http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-09...ign/index.html
TS is very popular on low reving Diesel Engines.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbosnail1000
Drag Racing
18
Feb 4, 2011 10:28 AM




