Why?
I personally love the NSX. I do see it as a supercar. The other day, I pulled up next to one at a stop sign, I said hi and gave him props for owning the only (to my knowledge) Acura that stock is faster than mine. Then we started talking about mods. Instead of arguaing about whos is better, we should just keep it chill and realize that all Honda/Acura cars are good. There are things that I like more about the GSR than my ITR, same goes for the CL and the RSX-S. All of which I am familliar with. Peace.
Sibling rivalry pure and simple.
After all the Integra Type R was billed the NSX's "Little Brother!"
I guess you understand what WE ITR owners deal with then? EVERY DAMN DAY!!!
Thanks for the observation though. See ya on the Freeway Big Bro, He He He....
A.
[Modified by 1GreyTeg, 8:00 PM 10/1/2001]
After all the Integra Type R was billed the NSX's "Little Brother!"
I guess you understand what WE ITR owners deal with then? EVERY DAMN DAY!!!
Thanks for the observation though. See ya on the Freeway Big Bro, He He He....
A.
[Modified by 1GreyTeg, 8:00 PM 10/1/2001]
I would love to race an old NSX. I've never tried. I guess I have too much respect for them... I doubt I could keep with one, but it would be fun to try. Also I've never seen one under WOT.
But think about this, and let the flames roll...
91 NSX - 0-60 5.8 1/4mile 14.4
00 ITR - 0-60 6.2 1/4mile 14.8
Take into account 11 years of wear, worn clutch, etc and I would be it would be closer than you think.
But think about this, and let the flames roll...
91 NSX - 0-60 5.8 1/4mile 14.4
00 ITR - 0-60 6.2 1/4mile 14.8
Take into account 11 years of wear, worn clutch, etc and I would be it would be closer than you think.
It don't mean jack that you can beat an NSX in a straight line. Hell there are some cars that can beat the McLaren F1 in a straight line and that costs a million dollars. There's more to a car than speed.
But think about this, and let the flames roll...
91 NSX - 0-60 5.8 1/4mile 14.4
00 ITR - 0-60 6.2 1/4mile 14.8
Take into account 11 years of wear, worn clutch, etc and I would be it would be closer than you think.
91 NSX - 0-60 5.8 1/4mile 14.4
00 ITR - 0-60 6.2 1/4mile 14.8
Take into account 11 years of wear, worn clutch, etc and I would be it would be closer than you think.
Think about THIS:
91 NSX - 0-60 5.4 1/4 mile 13.7 (Source: Motor Trend, 12/90)
91 NSX - 0-60 5.03 1/4 mile 13.47 (Source: Sports Car International, 12/90)
And, of course, that NSX next to you might be one of the newer ones:
98 NSX - 0-60 4.5 1/4 mile 12.9 (Source: Car and Driver 7/98)
[Modified by nsxtcjr, 6:27 AM 10/2/2001]
You're right. I didn't even realize they made NSX in auto. Yuck
Anyway, I did a quick search on mujen, and this is the first site I saw:
http://members.aol.com/jameslook/
Some of the 1995/96 NSX-T 0-60 were in the 6.4 second range!
But you're right, the new ones are fast as ****.
Anyway, I did a quick search on mujen, and this is the first site I saw:
http://members.aol.com/jameslook/
Some of the 1995/96 NSX-T 0-60 were in the 6.4 second range!
But you're right, the new ones are fast as ****.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickridez_3
Acura Integra Type-R
11
Aug 12, 2008 09:45 AM




