Erick's Racing Engine is...
An 85mm bore with an 87.2mm stroke, as on http://www.ericksracing.com , makes 1979cc.
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
An 85mm bore with an 87.2mm stroke, as on http://www.ericksracing.com , makes 1979cc.
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
[Modified by ITRbroham, 4:05 PM 8/3/2002]
I doubt the stroke is 95mm with a 10K rpm redline!
you doubt that or have any basis for your opinion.
I doubt the stroke is 95mm with a 10K rpm redline!
Of course you would. But of course you probably dont know why
you doubt that or have any basis for your opinion.
Of course you would. But of course you probably dont know why
you doubt that or have any basis for your opinion.
If I am wrong, please by all means enlighten me......I'm trying to learn! Leave the commentary for someone else.
Trending Topics
My question about their engine is why are they using the stock intake manifold? Wouldn't a race type like the jg or venom be better for a heavy breather like that?
Well, for starters, those sheetmetal manifolds suck. all of em.
2nd, apparently the gsr manifold is working for them and the gsr manifold
is the ONLY manifold on the market that matches the gsr port angle.
2nd, apparently the gsr manifold is working for them and the gsr manifold
is the ONLY manifold on the market that matches the gsr port angle.
I wouldnt go as far as to say sheetmetel manifolds suck...they dont...ther work well when they are designed for the specific car...which hasnt really been done to much with NA hondas...
as for the 95MM crank issue.....he doesnt run a deckplate....so a 95MM crank in a gsr bottom end would yield a HORRIBLE R/S ratio...prolly low 1.5's high 1.4's...thats why I dont think erick uses it....i dont think he would be able to make power as high as he does....
My guess is that he really does use the 87.2 crank he says he does......there are DEFINATELY alot of secrets in that car though....
#1 How he launches on those size slicks with stock axles and doesnt break EVER is beyond my understanding.....he has a great suspension system and he told me that axle angle is 99% of the problem with breaking them.
#2 There is absoutely no way on gods green earth he uses a stock tranny..he can say it all he wants...but it aint happening....no way...top of 5th with that size slicks...right.
#3 The manifold work must be EXTREMELY effective...he is moving serious air.
#4 Speaking of that manifold sgt...it doesnt matter what it matches up to and what it doesnt...he uses a b16 head not a gsr one....so there has got to be some secrets around that as well....what exactly i havent figured out yet...but we are working on it
as for the 95MM crank issue.....he doesnt run a deckplate....so a 95MM crank in a gsr bottom end would yield a HORRIBLE R/S ratio...prolly low 1.5's high 1.4's...thats why I dont think erick uses it....i dont think he would be able to make power as high as he does....
My guess is that he really does use the 87.2 crank he says he does......there are DEFINATELY alot of secrets in that car though....
#1 How he launches on those size slicks with stock axles and doesnt break EVER is beyond my understanding.....he has a great suspension system and he told me that axle angle is 99% of the problem with breaking them.
#2 There is absoutely no way on gods green earth he uses a stock tranny..he can say it all he wants...but it aint happening....no way...top of 5th with that size slicks...right.
#3 The manifold work must be EXTREMELY effective...he is moving serious air.
#4 Speaking of that manifold sgt...it doesnt matter what it matches up to and what it doesnt...he uses a b16 head not a gsr one....so there has got to be some secrets around that as well....what exactly i havent figured out yet...but we are working on it
just today miguel....we were runnin 12.00 and 12.10 so i got in and went 11.96 and then charlie had to show me up and run a 11.89 lol
cant wait for the next event at etown...reminder miguel...this was untuned...and new motor.....hopefully 11.50 by the end of the season
cant wait for the next event at etown...reminder miguel...this was untuned...and new motor.....hopefully 11.50 by the end of the season
Secret to not breaking Axles is in the clutch I believe with his setup, those of you who are experianced with Tilton realize what a valueable asset it is.
I spoke with Eric at Englishtown, and asked why a few of his parts where the way that the where and if he thought the car had more left in it. He replied by stating that IDRC likes to keep the field within .2 so the rules would change if he blasted the competition out of the water, rather he can change a few things here and there and lower his times as the competition approaches. None the less it's a very impressive vehicle that is built to put the time down.
I spoke with Eric at Englishtown, and asked why a few of his parts where the way that the where and if he thought the car had more left in it. He replied by stating that IDRC likes to keep the field within .2 so the rules would change if he blasted the competition out of the water, rather he can change a few things here and there and lower his times as the competition approaches. None the less it's a very impressive vehicle that is built to put the time down.
New User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Witty Comment....., Stunning Response...., Follow Up Gag.....
If I was actually coherant and cared about hondas, i would not listen to "rembrant" who can't spell his own name. Considering rembranDt has a "D"
An 85mm bore with an 87.2mm stroke, as on http://www.ericksracing.com , makes 1979cc.
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
The TODA website USED (on the old page) to say it used a Crower 95mm billet stroker crank, which would make 2156cc.
Maybe they changed the bore, maybe they changed the stroke, who knows?
nick
is it a 1.98L as stated in superstreet, 2.0L as stated on the Erick's Website or 2.1L as stated on Toda's website?
which super street issue was he in?
which super street issue was he in?
Funny thing is that him and Tonys times are almost identical and tony weighs 200 lbs more.....albeit he uses alcohol and erick doesnt......still 200 lbs is alot
Ericks uses a gsr crank , the way he builds his 2.0l
is just a lot of research and experiment that he has done , by using different products .
an coming out to his own specs
like for the record the header that he uses* was his own design ,not a SMS header.
also the he is running Toda cams to his spec (since exponsor by Toda )
he is running a gsr head and also gsr manifold to prove a point
which he already has .
[Modified by Spoon1, 7:45 AM 8/5/2002]
is just a lot of research and experiment that he has done , by using different products .an coming out to his own specs
like for the record the header that he uses* was his own design ,not a SMS header.
also the he is running Toda cams to his spec (since exponsor by Toda )
he is running a gsr head and also gsr manifold to prove a point
which he already has .[Modified by Spoon1, 7:45 AM 8/5/2002]



