Integra Ls b18 stock = how much horsepower ?
#4
Junior Member
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bla1ne »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Im guessing about 115hp blah weak !!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
94 and up LS's have 140 hp and i believe 130 torque (not %100 sure) stock, so im sure he's got a little more power than that.
94 and up LS's have 140 hp and i believe 130 torque (not %100 sure) stock, so im sure he's got a little more power than that.
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emwink.gif)
#5
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas Sewers, Usa
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OBX products proabably decrease performance
Anyways Ricer way of adding it up
140+ ricer mods = 157 hp y0
In reality not much
![](http://images.honda-tech.com/set1/smile/emcrook.gif)
Anyways Ricer way of adding it up
140+ ricer mods = 157 hp y0
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emhammer.gif)
In reality not much
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emsmile.gif)
#6
Junior Member
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by quikB18B »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">OBX products proabably decrease performance
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree
![](http://images.honda-tech.com/set1/smile/emcrook.gif)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emthup.gif)
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emthup.gif)
#7
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turboxsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
94 and up LS's have 140 hp and i believe 130 torque (not %100 sure) stock, so im sure he's got a little more power than that.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
He's talking wheel hp.
94 and up LS's have 140 hp and i believe 130 torque (not %100 sure) stock, so im sure he's got a little more power than that.
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emwink.gif)
He's talking wheel hp.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by arw321 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
He's talking wheel hp.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Even then thats not much whp my buddies ls has about 128 whp i/h/e, plus he didn't specify whp.
He's talking wheel hp.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Even then thats not much whp my buddies ls has about 128 whp i/h/e, plus he didn't specify whp.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: RVA, USA
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i did a baseline for my 93 integra bone stock so i could get an idea of what i was looking at, and it dynoed at 123 whp and 118 tq,
and a baseline for a 92 gs-r bone stock was 141 and 110 (i forgot the tq, but it was around there)
and a baseline for a 92 gs-r bone stock was 141 and 110 (i forgot the tq, but it was around there)
#10
Junior Member
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA-nteg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i did a baseline for my 93 integra bone stock so i could get an idea of what i was looking at, and it dynoed at 123 whp and 118 tq,
and a baseline for a 92 gs-r bone stock was 141 and 110 (i forgot the tq, but it was around there) </TD></TR></TABLE>
and a baseline for a 92 gs-r bone stock was 141 and 110 (i forgot the tq, but it was around there) </TD></TR></TABLE>
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emthup.gif)
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 106 and Park
Posts: 6,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
we dynoed a ls motor in a civic w/ stock exhaust, stock cat, and stock intake and it put down 98 whp.we dynoed an integra w/ an obx muffler, obx cold air and high flow cat and it put down 128 whp.
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emsmile.gif)
#14
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: pothole heaven, VA, USA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
speaking of rice, just run with open throttlebody, and open exhaust, i'm sure the buttdyno will yield good gains.
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emsmilep.gif)
#15
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by espanol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">we dynoed a ls motor in a civic w/ stock exhaust, stock cat, and stock intake and it put down 98 whp.we dynoed an integra w/ an obx muffler, obx cold air and high flow cat and it put down 128 whp.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wow, that cat must have been really clogged.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss the LS should dyno around 119 or so to the wheels, stock. I'd say your friends numbers with boltons are pretty decent.
Adam
![](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emsmile.gif)
Wow, that cat must have been really clogged.
Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss the LS should dyno around 119 or so to the wheels, stock. I'd say your friends numbers with boltons are pretty decent.
Adam
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: RVA, USA
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ronin EG6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B18a 130hp at the flywheel and B18b 140hp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i think the b18a has 130
and the b18a1 is 140
all b18b are 140
i think the b18a has 130
and the b18a1 is 140
all b18b are 140
#17
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ronin EG6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B18a 130hp at the flywheel and B18b 140hp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Misinformation.
90-91 b18a1 = 130hp
92-93 b18a1 = 140hp
94-up b18b1 = ~140hp.
Modified by arw321 at 11:58 AM 11/19/2003
Misinformation.
90-91 b18a1 = 130hp
92-93 b18a1 = 140hp
94-up b18b1 = ~140hp.
Modified by arw321 at 11:58 AM 11/19/2003
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thats only a 6% loss. I doubt the TQ number was that high. (Damn thats sad 110WTQ is to high) I know you are not trying to spread bad info so Im not trying to bash your numbers. I do know that the TQ on the B17 and the B16 are close so the number was probably closer to 100TQ-104TQ
I know I sound petty but I think 110 is just too high....
141/160 = 11.8% loss
110/117 = 5.9% loss
I know I sound petty but I think 110 is just too high....
141/160 = 11.8% loss
110/117 = 5.9% loss
#20
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
no, the 90 - 91 b18a1 was rated at 130, but for some odd reason, the 92-93 b18a1 put out 140. Technically the same motor, same code and everything, but there are minor changes that brought about the hp diff. like the 90-91 has a diff intake manifold/throttle body than the 92-93
#21
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Integra has a drivetrain loss of 13.5%. So this thing should make 128 at the wheels. (5HP worth of mods).
The 13.5% works for the HP conversion from CHP to WHP - the torque conversion isn't linear.
The 13.5% works for the HP conversion from CHP to WHP - the torque conversion isn't linear.
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: RVA, USA
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlackSage »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats only a 6% loss. I doubt the TQ number was that high. (Damn thats sad 110WTQ is to high) I know you are not trying to spread bad info so Im not trying to bash your numbers. I do know that the TQ on the B17 and the B16 are close so the number was probably closer to 100TQ-104TQ
I know I sound petty but I think 110 is just too high....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i might be off on the b17(since it wasnt mine, wasnt all up in it).. this was like a few years ago... i needa look for the dyno sheets... i will try to find them this weekend and post them
I know I sound petty but I think 110 is just too high....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i might be off on the b17(since it wasnt mine, wasnt all up in it).. this was like a few years ago... i needa look for the dyno sheets... i will try to find them this weekend and post them
#23
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tossnupweight »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you stated exactly what he just did.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Can't you read?
Can't you read?
#25
![Default](https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Everyone who keeps putting the bhp numbers at 90 to 110 is full of **** and don't know wtf their talking about the ls b18b makes about 127bhp so kid don't listen to all these haters and idiots that run their mouth and are of no help.