i tested my car last night.....
0-60 mph.....9.22s
0-400m .....17.XX s
is it good or bad.....my car is a Sx-16 australia version

 

Weak

 

whats the elevation in australia ( or where u run.....)

 

better than my car

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by arw321 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Weak</TD></TR></TABLE>

* 1,000,000,000
gmoore

 

how did you test it? with a stopwatch or g-tech? those are not always accurate. was it at a track? what were the conditions you tested under? and what is the sx-16 comparable to in the US?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by texnteg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and what is the sx-16 comparable to in the US?</TD></TR></TABLE>

ummm... i think its comparable to the f18 hornet

 

i don't know all the non-US models of integras...sorry. i assume by "16" it has a b16 maybe? yes, jets are slow in acceleration on the tarmac. they perform better in the mid and upper range. must be those vtec thrusters.

 

well what should a 95 gsr with boltons be running closer to? 6.5 0-60 and like 15.2 quarter?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Acura95GsR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well what should a 95 gsr with boltons be running closer to? 6.5 0-60 and like 15.2 quarter?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

with the basic bolt ons on a gsr, you should be in the 14s.

 

9.22 0-60 really sucks nuts.

 

my car is just a standard one...testing at night using G-tech.....
it is equiped with a D16a engine.......

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slowman &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">9.22 0-60 really sucks nuts.</TD></TR></TABLE>

funny and true. if my car took nearly 10 seconds to hit 60 id refrain from ever flooring the car (and embarassing myself)

 

wtf is an sx-16

 

Man, I had a buddy check mine (stock 97 RS with intake) with a stopwatch, and I hit a 7.5! 9.6 seems pretty slow...
Good excuse to buy a b18c5!

 

9.22 s??

that sucks

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by milanokwong &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my car is just a standard one...testing at night using G-tech.....
it is equiped with a D16a engine.......
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Could be fairly accurate numbers then...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thrty8street &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wtf is an sx-16</TD></TR></TABLE>


WTF

 

he said the sx-16 is a D16 powered integra. i'm going to assume that it is an australian marketed integra.

 

i took the gtech to the track and it was right on everytime i ran...i ran a 6.2 0-60 mph.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GTScott &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Man, I had a buddy check mine (stock 97 RS with intake) with a stopwatch, and I hit a 7.5! 9.6 seems pretty slow...
Good excuse to buy a b18c5! </TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah, your stopwatch method is even more inacurate than a gtech.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by arw321 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yeah, your stopwatch method is even more inacurate than a gtech.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Implying that a Gtech is inaccurate is, well, inaccurate.

For measuring time, I don't think you can find flaw in it. Neiher can you find any flaw in the accelerometers that measure the forces, or the math that ties it all together.

Cheers,
Roy

 

How fast does an 13 sec EG civic with a b18C motor hit in 0-60 mph?

 

13 seconds duh!

 

7.2( i think) with i/h/muffler with pipping with 17's
g-tch