corvette vs. supra tt?
#51
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (builthatch)
Turbo is a Revhard T3/T04E hybrid... Motor = B18C bored .50mm over, JE 9.0:1 pistons, Eagle rods, Portflow GSR head with JG Edelbrock manifold, B16A cams, RC 440cc injectors, chipped P28 running Hondata 2.. He ran it last Sunday but now it's in a 98 hatch it ran 12.0@118 on 13psi.
#52
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (MaD3 In JaPaN)
Since all my friend have vettes, let me say this.
A bpu supra on rice gas is faster than a
2002 z06
z06 with full bolt ons.
any ls1 car
pretty much any ls1 unless it has heads/cams (even then they usually lose), NOS, or a supercharger.
I have video of all the humanity
A bpu supra on rice gas is faster than a
2002 z06
z06 with full bolt ons.
any ls1 car
pretty much any ls1 unless it has heads/cams (even then they usually lose), NOS, or a supercharger.
I have video of all the humanity
#53
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 99,999, posts aka FrostWhiteDC4
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TwystedSpeed04)
Corvette?? bitch please You aint nothin but a vaniral disease so get back down on ur knees. and show the true respect to the Supra TT.
-TS04
-TS04
IMO i think vettes are fast.
i have a family owned 1976 corvette stingray L-48. 180hp, 217lb torque.
#54
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (importoverdomestic)
Well I have personally seen a showroom stock ZO6 hit a 11.9 in the 1/4 mile on the factory tire, the car didn't even have the first oil change yet.
Modded LS1/LS6 vettes have ran 9's and 10's in street trim for a couple years now.
All that being said I'd rather have a Skyline.
RF
Modded LS1/LS6 vettes have ran 9's and 10's in street trim for a couple years now.
All that being said I'd rather have a Skyline.
RF
#55
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (OBD1KNOBE)
Huh? Well lets look at it this way, give me 45k to build a honda and i guarntee you it will own your precious Z06 like a bit bull fighting a jack russel terrier, and also you dont care about hp/liter? You go around braging about 71hp/liter? Look at the finely built Honda S2000 121hp/liter, i dont care what you say imports will always dominate...
#56
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northeast, USA
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TwystedSpeed04)
it will own your precious Z06 like a bit bull fighting a jack russel terrier
But regarding this thread... I want to say one thing to ALL of you:
1000+ horsepower potential on an engine you don't even need to remove the valvecover from.
Enough said.
- Louis (Obviously a Supra owner)
#57
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (MaD3 In JaPaN)
Stock for stock - Vette , modded NA Vette vs. modded Supra - TT BUT as the above states :QUOTE Lingenfelter Corvette TT OWNS ALLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no Supra will hang w/a TT or even single T Vette. BUT I would still rather have the TT
no Supra will hang w/a TT or even single T Vette. BUT I would still rather have the TT
#58
MiG-21 superfan
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: near the ocean, Moderator City, NJ
Posts: 8,628
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TwystedSpeed04)
you wil pour 45k into a honda and it will atleast go 170+ mph, atleast run 11's on slicks, atleast pull 1g on the skidpad, and atleast have a factory warranty and heated seats???
#59
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (builthatch)
The opti were on LT-1s (vettes 92-96 and f-bodys with that engine). Basically they are easily affected by moisture (early ones were NOT vented, newer ones were fixed). Get the opti wet and it will cost you close to $1000! Very labor intensive.
The C5s have LS1s or LS6s and do not have that problem. I would prefer to have the vette over the supra (assuming no mods). Anyone who has driven both cars would not disagree with me. I would definitely take a Supra over a regular C4 (84-96) though! Unless it was a GS,96 with a 6-speed (LT4), ZR-1, or one of the blessed Lingenfelter models.
I am lucky to own both a vette and honda (among others) and this "importZ rule" is so "close minded" and foolish...you are missing out!
If we are talking blown/boosted/juiced, well who knows... I guess it goes to the one with the biggest wallet.
97 C5s are now in the low $20K.
The C5s have LS1s or LS6s and do not have that problem. I would prefer to have the vette over the supra (assuming no mods). Anyone who has driven both cars would not disagree with me. I would definitely take a Supra over a regular C4 (84-96) though! Unless it was a GS,96 with a 6-speed (LT4), ZR-1, or one of the blessed Lingenfelter models.
I am lucky to own both a vette and honda (among others) and this "importZ rule" is so "close minded" and foolish...you are missing out!
If we are talking blown/boosted/juiced, well who knows... I guess it goes to the one with the biggest wallet.
97 C5s are now in the low $20K.
#61
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TimoneX)
Yes I know. Another fantastic ignition solution to a problem that doesn't exist by GM. High Energy Ignition anyone? Yuck.
Just remember that it isn't just american companies that do this! My lexus had the power steering pump located above the alternator. Drip..drip...bzzt, new alt. needed! Or my old Civic speedo cable that ran near the A/C lines at an angle. Cable ate through housing and then through a/c line - freon all gone!
#62
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wayland, MI, US
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (pzoom)
I know I know...and I like GM. Every Domestic I've owned with the exception of 1(AMC Jeep) has been a General Motors product. I don't expect perfection from a car company, but what I do dislike strongly, is when a car builder KNOWS there's a problem with a car and just ignores it. When Camaro's are on the reliability risk sheets for 5+ years for exactly the same problems, it's frustrating. You see allot less of this from the Jap car companies. You generally see a new model come out, followed by a couple service bulletins, and when they're updated the problems are generally addressed.
#63
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TimoneX)
my vote goes to the corvette...It is faster..bottom line....although corvette is far from being my favorite car. Id take a newer twin turbo supra over it any day. Styling in the Supra, I believe, dominates the Corvette.
but, then again, my car is faster than both of them..heh
but, then again, my car is faster than both of them..heh
#64
MiG-21 superfan
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: near the ocean, Moderator City, NJ
Posts: 8,628
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (Turbo C1)
I think everyone is forgetting this- the orig question was which one is faster...top speed? Z06, around a turn? Z06, 1/4 mile/0-60? Z06, all this for 50k and a warranty...wtf is a better deal than that?
#65
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Burlington, WI, USA
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (builthatch)
i think everyone is forgetting, the bottom line is "which one is faster" not "which has more potential"...
this thread should have never turned into what it was...some people just need to answer the damn question
(sorry, don't take offence to that. its coming from a n00b )
this thread should have never turned into what it was...some people just need to answer the damn question
(sorry, don't take offence to that. its coming from a n00b )
#66
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Columbia, SC, USA
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (MikeMAN)
Boy this is fun! I see this kind of post everyday on the Camaro forum. Here's my take. I think Supras are awesome. I have ridden in many 550+ RWHP single turbo Supras, and some 400+ RWHP twins. While the twins felt "fast", the single felt weak to me, I can only guess from a lack of torque. I like the thrust you get from a torquey V8 more, in a bigger car. I also love the way a turbo honda "pulls" you tho. I guess its because of the nature of a light versus heavy car, front/rear drive differences, whatever. If I were to choose either car, I would definitely consider the Supra, but probably go with the vette. Both are available as targas, and that is nice. I just have become kind of weary of a daily driver turbo car. There just seems to be more issues with them. Not as consistent, boost controller problems, etc. I could get a used vette for $25K with about 80K miles, take it to MTI and spend $18K with them. Boom, instant 9 second 1/4s (slicks of course) on MOTOR. Best of all, it comes with a 2 year/24K mile warranty! YES! A warranty, and they WANT you to race it! It just doesn't get any better than that. There really is no replacement for displacement. I would always have power and torque, and it would be very broad, not peaky as a single turbo car is. MTIs 427 is BAD. I like torque, (along with horsepower, cause no I don't want a diesel truck) and I think most Americans do as well. Thats the main reason big engines are popular here.
#67
Honda-Tech Member
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (builthatch)
You're not going to run 10's in any streetable N/A small block car with full interior. As it stands, the Z06 is a mid to high 12 second car with 405HP. Dropping a couple of seconds from this ET would require about 700HP, which you are not going to get in anything anywhere near streetable trim without a turbo, supercharger, or NOS. Also, no 10 second car runs 170MPH trap speeds.
[Modified by StorminMatt, 2:58 AM 10/9/2002]
[Modified by StorminMatt, 2:58 AM 10/9/2002]
#68
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Surf City, CA, USA
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (StorminMatt)
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=395824
For those of you who have never heard Mark's car in person,it is a real sleeper,very quiet.This car has also passed NJ emissions
[Modified by OBD1KNOBE, 9:32 PM 10/8/2002]
For those of you who have never heard Mark's car in person,it is a real sleeper,very quiet.This car has also passed NJ emissions
[Modified by OBD1KNOBE, 9:32 PM 10/8/2002]
#69
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (MJ23FE)
Hey check it out (http://www.edmunds.com/new/2003/chev...6m/prices.html) a new Z06 is at least 51K. The Supra sold for 40K new in 1998! Oh, ya, in 1998 there was no Z06! That leaves roughly 11K to use as you will. In my case I would modify the Supra and in doing so create a car that could smoke your Vette. Bottom line. Oh ya for the Honda boys out there that want to build a Honda to compare. We are talking totally different types of cars. I road race Hondas. There is no comparison between these cars as far as weight, drive train, style etc....
#70
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (OBD1KNOBE)
Speaking from experience, I own a 94TT as well as several other high performance sports cars (MB SLK32, MB CLK55, 98 ITR, Honda S2000), my Supra, as well as any other MKIV Supra would leave a Vette behind after shifting to second. You can buy a MKIV Supra used for $25k with 30k miles stock. For $10k more go to a single Turbo and for $5K more in suspension upgrades you have a car that runs 10 second quarters, 180 - 200 mph, anywhere from 730 to 1000 hp at the wheels and handling that is at least equal to the Vette! All that and you have about $14k left from the sticker price of a Z06 ($54K)! By the way is there really any question on reliability of Toyota vs GM? Oh ya, I got 27 miles per gallon on the highway with it when I went to the Supra Convention in Los Vegas. There is not another production car made that can touch a Supra for ultimate performance. Try and upgrade a Vette and see what you will pay. I know my friend had a Vette and he started down that path and was very frustrated. He finally sold it and got a Viper.
I didn't know your car buy a Toyota Supra for 25k with 30,000 miles. That must be an awesome deal. What else I didn't know is that 10 second 1/4 you can have trap speeds from 180-200 mph. 730-1000 horsepower aint gonna handle that good since it got so much power. 27 miles per gallon on the highway is cool but the vette gets around the same, even better. Lets not talk about I can make this car faster and for cheaper than that car because I can very well modify a CRX and smoke that supra. The vette is a very good all around car.
And whats this talk about no other production car that can touch the supra for performance? Don't give me that crap. I don't believe anyword that you said. I do believe that u own a supra but u think you are on top of the world with that.
Great English there! I was not giving trap speeds but rather top end speeds. You dont seem to understand, just because a car has the potential for 750 hp doesn't mean you have to use all of it all the time. When I road race and autocross the car I turn the boost down. Maybe if you would read a little you would be able to understand why I made the statement that no other production car made for the money can come close to the numbers a single turbo Supra can produce and still be street worthy. Which would rule out your modified CRX.
[Modified by OBD1KNOBE, 2:14 AM 9/24/2002]
I didn't know your car buy a Toyota Supra for 25k with 30,000 miles. That must be an awesome deal. What else I didn't know is that 10 second 1/4 you can have trap speeds from 180-200 mph. 730-1000 horsepower aint gonna handle that good since it got so much power. 27 miles per gallon on the highway is cool but the vette gets around the same, even better. Lets not talk about I can make this car faster and for cheaper than that car because I can very well modify a CRX and smoke that supra. The vette is a very good all around car.
And whats this talk about no other production car that can touch the supra for performance? Don't give me that crap. I don't believe anyword that you said. I do believe that u own a supra but u think you are on top of the world with that.
Great English there! I was not giving trap speeds but rather top end speeds. You dont seem to understand, just because a car has the potential for 750 hp doesn't mean you have to use all of it all the time. When I road race and autocross the car I turn the boost down. Maybe if you would read a little you would be able to understand why I made the statement that no other production car made for the money can come close to the numbers a single turbo Supra can produce and still be street worthy. Which would rule out your modified CRX.
[Modified by OBD1KNOBE, 2:14 AM 9/24/2002]
#71
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (TypeIII)
Who gives a **** what you can do to a Supra with the Vette's sticker price? Going by your logic, aren't you better off with a 280Z and dropping in a 350 mated with a 6 speed box? Lighter, faster, and handles better with fraction of the money you mentioned.
I guess you have never raced by your comment. That engine would throw off the balance of the Z. Besides, with the Supra we are talking bolt on mods not engine swaps. Stock bottom end with a worked head and a bigger turbo.
You can talk about your "streetable, 1000hp" Supra all day long but bottom line is, without 100+ octane gas (note: you don't live at the track, do you?) you'll lose what, 30? 40% of your power?
Wrong again. You can run on 93 octane up to 17 lbs of boost. That's good for over 500 rwhp! Still enough to smoke most street legal cars. Depending on what turbo upgrade you go with you can put out up to 1000 rwhp on 100+ octane.
The battle doesn't end right there either... How about drivetrain upgrade?
Wrong again. No drive train upgrade needed other than a clutch which is about $700. The transmission is made by GETRAG which is a German tranny maker. Some of the best transmission in the business. I believe they make they for Porshe also.
And don't even go to the fuel economy issue... If you're gonna spend that amount of money to build a fast car, who gives a rats *** about gas? Besides, the GM's 6 speed box is pretty cool... Can you say 1500rpm at 80mph?
With a 3000cc motor, 3200lb chassis, I don't see any "ultimate performance".
Any intelligent replies welcomed. But if you're gonna be a close minded "die hard import fan" then just ignore my post and continue fixing up your ultimate performance machine.
I guess you have never raced by your comment. That engine would throw off the balance of the Z. Besides, with the Supra we are talking bolt on mods not engine swaps. Stock bottom end with a worked head and a bigger turbo.
You can talk about your "streetable, 1000hp" Supra all day long but bottom line is, without 100+ octane gas (note: you don't live at the track, do you?) you'll lose what, 30? 40% of your power?
Wrong again. You can run on 93 octane up to 17 lbs of boost. That's good for over 500 rwhp! Still enough to smoke most street legal cars. Depending on what turbo upgrade you go with you can put out up to 1000 rwhp on 100+ octane.
The battle doesn't end right there either... How about drivetrain upgrade?
Wrong again. No drive train upgrade needed other than a clutch which is about $700. The transmission is made by GETRAG which is a German tranny maker. Some of the best transmission in the business. I believe they make they for Porshe also.
And don't even go to the fuel economy issue... If you're gonna spend that amount of money to build a fast car, who gives a rats *** about gas? Besides, the GM's 6 speed box is pretty cool... Can you say 1500rpm at 80mph?
With a 3000cc motor, 3200lb chassis, I don't see any "ultimate performance".
Any intelligent replies welcomed. But if you're gonna be a close minded "die hard import fan" then just ignore my post and continue fixing up your ultimate performance machine.
#72
MiG-21 superfan
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: near the ocean, Moderator City, NJ
Posts: 8,628
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (StorminMatt)
You're not going to run 10's in any streetable N/A small block car with full interior. As it stands, the Z06 is a mid to high 12 second car with 405HP. Dropping a couple of seconds from this ET would require about 700HP, which you are not going to get in anything anywhere near streetable trim without a turbo, supercharger, or NOS. Also, no 10 second car runs 170MPH trap speeds.
[Modified by builthatch, 8:57 AM 10/10/2002]
#73
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (StorminMatt)
You're not going to run 10's in any streetable N/A small block car with full interior. As it stands, the Z06 is a mid to high 12 second car with 405HP. Dropping a couple of seconds from this ET would require about 700HP, which you are not going to get in anything anywhere near streetable trim without a turbo, supercharger, or NOS. Also, no 10 second car runs 170MPH trap speeds.
[Modified by StorminMatt, 2:58 AM 10/9/2002]
[Modified by StorminMatt, 2:58 AM 10/9/2002]
That is a 10.99 car all motor! No juice, no boost..
Here is a pic:
Is anything cooler than the front wheels lifting up?? And people would rather have a supra????
#75
Honda-Tech Member
Re: corvette vs. supra tt? (elude)
Since all my friend have vettes, let me say this.
A bpu supra on rice gas is faster than a
2002 z06
z06 with full bolt ons.
any ls1 car
pretty much any ls1 unless it has heads/cams (even then they usually lose), NOS, or a supercharger.
I have video of all the humanity
A bpu supra on rice gas is faster than a
2002 z06
z06 with full bolt ons.
any ls1 car
pretty much any ls1 unless it has heads/cams (even then they usually lose), NOS, or a supercharger.
I have video of all the humanity
I've seen videos of BPU supras 'killing' z06's on the highway...
It's kinda not fair though..they get to a speed where the Supra is just waiting in FULL boost....they go, the supra pulls out about a car on the Vette, but doesn't PULL anymore...just stays like that with the z06 actually reeling it in on the top end. It's crap....that's what it is. I know...i've seen them.
I also hate this argument about efficiency...
When you're boosted, you can't argue that crap!!!!! you also can't argue hp/l with boost either...