AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer?
Is there any kind of function differences between AEM FPR and B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? Possible drivebility (power) effects?
PS! B&M Commandflo is 5 times cheaper than AEM FPR. Of course AEM is 1:1 FPR which replaces the stock FPR, as B&M uses stock FPR, but still the price difference is hudge!!!!
Also is the Fuel Pressure Regulator "must product" if my 2 gen Honda CRX 1.6i-16V DOHC is equipped with K&N CAI, 4-2-1 header and sportexhaust system?
AEM FPR:
B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer:
PS! B&M Commandflo is 5 times cheaper than AEM FPR. Of course AEM is 1:1 FPR which replaces the stock FPR, as B&M uses stock FPR, but still the price difference is hudge!!!!
Also is the Fuel Pressure Regulator "must product" if my 2 gen Honda CRX 1.6i-16V DOHC is equipped with K&N CAI, 4-2-1 header and sportexhaust system?
AEM FPR:
B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer:
#2
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (dochmees)
I guess it depends on if you are going to boost, or use nitrous. AEM doesn't recommend theirs to be used on n2o kits that use direct bottle pressure to modify fuel pressure. If you don't ever want to put your stock one back on, adn want to save money, go with the B&M. Is it a "must have"? No. Can you free up some HP? Yes, get it dyno tuned and you can get from 0-15 HP depending on your motor/mods. If you don't have it on the dyno and don't now what you are doing can you lose HP? Yes.
#3
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (sp)
Thnx for your answer
If I install FPR and will not get my CRX dynoed, how can I lost power?
If I have K&N CAI and 4-2-1 header I can presume that my car runs little bit lean. If I measure the stock pressure and after that will boost lets say 2-3 psi more than stock fuel pressure I don`t think it would harm my Hp readings, if I go too wild then of course overfuelling is a bad thing.
PS! Does anyone know how much usually should be Honda CRX 1.6i-16V DOHC (with K&N and 4-2-1 header + sportexhaust) fuel pressure to gain some power and to confirm that its not run too lean? I know that dyno is the right place, but in our country there are no dyno possibilities so others practice would be nice!!! Stock fuel pressure should be 35-41 psi.
[Modified by dochmees, 7:05 AM 11/21/2002]
If I install FPR and will not get my CRX dynoed, how can I lost power?
If I have K&N CAI and 4-2-1 header I can presume that my car runs little bit lean. If I measure the stock pressure and after that will boost lets say 2-3 psi more than stock fuel pressure I don`t think it would harm my Hp readings, if I go too wild then of course overfuelling is a bad thing.
PS! Does anyone know how much usually should be Honda CRX 1.6i-16V DOHC (with K&N and 4-2-1 header + sportexhaust) fuel pressure to gain some power and to confirm that its not run too lean? I know that dyno is the right place, but in our country there are no dyno possibilities so others practice would be nice!!! Stock fuel pressure should be 35-41 psi.
[Modified by dochmees, 7:05 AM 11/21/2002]
#4
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (dochmees)
Yes, with those mods, I would start with bumping it up 2 lbs. You can then try 1 at a time and do some runs. A good method to verify your butt dyno readings is in 2nd or 3rd gear, start at a certain RPMs(say 2000) then floor it and count how long it takes to get to redline. It can't compare to a dyno, but at least it is somewhat measurable.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (sp)
I would go with the AEM..... I've used both to tune and the AEM seems a lot more tuneable.... The B&M works but just not as well..... But is it worth the extra money??? The AEM is like 3 times as expensive!!
#7
Member
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (dochmees)
With the B&M you can only raise the fuel pressure. With the AEM you can both raise and lower the fuel pressure.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (91civic)
Also you must keep in mind that B&M reuses stock FPR. Meaning it'll keep the stock flow rate, where as AEM is a total replacement and, i'm sure, will out flow stock ones.
Jay Kim
Jay Kim
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,418
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (AllMotorMonster)
hehehe yea, that's not bad... I've got those B&M's before for like $40 and the AEM's normally run around $150 so I was just saying.... AEM
#10
Re: AEM FPR or B&M Commandflo Fuel Pressure Optimizer? (JDMspecEG6)
Oh, yeah, I almost forgot another benefit of the AEM, it comes with replaceable discharge ports in different sizes. The B&M you would have to drill out the orifice with the right bit. With higher fuel pressure, under hard driving when you let off the gas, the stock one may not discharge enough, causing an overly rich condition causing a rough idle(possible stalling) until the pressure regulates.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tr0n9h
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
09-26-2005 09:08 PM
turbochic
Forced Induction
5
05-15-2003 06:29 PM