Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
#1
Accident Prone
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The runoff of a track near you.
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
No backstory, just curious. I'm under the impression that it's bad since you lose contact from one of the tires, theoretically decreasing your overall contact patch. But I've heard people--who may not exactly be the best to talk to about this sort of stuff--say that if you three-wheel, it attests to the stiffness of your chassis and is a good thing.
#2
Ridin Dirty in Cali
iTrader: (1)
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
I think if you search the forum you'll find many a write up by one of our members who is obsessed with this stuff.
Honestly there is absolutely no way to keep all four wheels planted.
Its something you can reduce by chassis set up but eliminate never.
Honestly there is absolutely no way to keep all four wheels planted.
Its something you can reduce by chassis set up but eliminate never.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Playing in the sandbox
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
Not true... you can eliminate 3 wheeling completely by going stiff enough in the front. Granted, you'll go more slowly this way than letting that inside rear skim just above the ground...
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Snowwhitepillowformybigfathead
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
Hey OP...there are people who think that front wheel drive race cars oughtn't lift the inside rear tire because bad things happen - things they presumably think worse than keeping as much weight as possible on the inside front - and that only anachronistically set up fwd cars do it. Like these clowns:
Scott, who isn't "obsessed"...so you must be talking about somebody else eh Paul?
PS - apology and appreciation to OJSantiago for reprinting his AWESOME shot.
Trending Topics
#10
Ridin Dirty in Cali
iTrader: (1)
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
"I see how you are".
Hey OP...there are people who think that front wheel drive race cars oughtn't lift the inside rear tire because bad things happen - things they presumably think worse than keeping as much weight as possible on the inside front - and that only anachronistically set up fwd cars do it. Like these clowns:
Scott, who isn't "obsessed"...so you must be talking about somebody else eh Paul?
PS - apology and appreciation to OJSantiago for reprinting his AWESOME shot.
Hey OP...there are people who think that front wheel drive race cars oughtn't lift the inside rear tire because bad things happen - things they presumably think worse than keeping as much weight as possible on the inside front - and that only anachronistically set up fwd cars do it. Like these clowns:
Scott, who isn't "obsessed"...so you must be talking about somebody else eh Paul?
PS - apology and appreciation to OJSantiago for reprinting his AWESOME shot.
OP there are many threads created by Scott who is a subject matter expert on wheel lifting
Just search his screen name and enjoy all the reading.
I know i dont want to dial out all the wheel lift in my car so i just tricycle around the courses every now and then.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Playing in the sandbox
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
Ok Scott so you arent obsessed but you like it alot
OP there are many threads created by Scott who is a subject matter expert on wheel lifting
Just search his screen name and enjoy all the reading.
I know i dont want to dial out all the wheel lift in my car so i just tricycle around the courses every now and then.
OP there are many threads created by Scott who is a subject matter expert on wheel lifting
Just search his screen name and enjoy all the reading.
I know i dont want to dial out all the wheel lift in my car so i just tricycle around the courses every now and then.
Christian, not a Sooooper Genius... someday maybe, someday.
#13
DixielandImports Please
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
I noticed when my car did not lift the inside rear I had a ton of oversteer.
When I lowered the rear of the car some, I fixed the oversteer but now the inside lifts.
I like it better this way
When I lowered the rear of the car some, I fixed the oversteer but now the inside lifts.
I like it better this way
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Snowwhitepillowformybigfathead
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
And the less your inside rear lifts, the smaller the window of "optimum" grip balance you're likely to have... or at least that's how it works in my head... which is where I do most of my thinking about this stuff.
Christian, not a Sooooper Genius... someday maybe, someday.
Christian, not a Sooooper Genius... someday maybe, someday.
Scott, who didn't have what it took to be an actual genius...but had what it took to get an Honorary (?) "Sooooper Genius"...
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Playing in the sandbox
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
Right, but the stiffer the car is overall, the less the peak lift, necessarily. Lift or not, I expect the smart/fast guys to be maximizing the window of optimumity.
Scott, who didn't have what it took to be an actual genius...but had what it took to get an Honorary (?) "Sooooper Genius"...
Scott, who didn't have what it took to be an actual genius...but had what it took to get an Honorary (?) "Sooooper Genius"...
Christian, who may or may not have a set of triples in his future.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Great Falls, MT, USA
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
when our car 3 wheels under trail braking we totally smoke (flat spot) that tire. It sucks! Then we have vibration and what not. Our LR at the Ridge only lasted 10hrs before cords show. The RR however looked almost new, as it should.
I know this is more of a brake balance problem than a handling issue but something to consider.
I know this is more of a brake balance problem than a handling issue but something to consider.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Playing in the sandbox
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
when our car 3 wheels under trail braking we totally smoke (flat spot) that tire. It sucks! Then we have vibration and what not. Our LR at the Ridge only lasted 10hrs before cords show. The RR however looked almost new, as it should.
I know this is more of a brake balance problem than a handling issue but something to consider.
I know this is more of a brake balance problem than a handling issue but something to consider.
<--- has driven LeChumpers that let you trail brake all the way to the apex... they also made square rear tires regularly. Loosened the car up, the square tires went away, and the lap times dropped as well.
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
I've gone Scott's way. My car does not lift an inside rear tire now. And I run up front and qualify on pole most weekends (not tooting my own horn. Just pointing it out).
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Great Falls, MT, USA
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Snowwhitepillowformybigfathead
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
GSpeedR, who I hold in considerable regard and who is my superior in many ways, repeats something Horrendous when he says that as soon as a wheel lifts the roll stiffness of the car changes. That's not as right as it sounds. The car with biased front/rear roll stiffness has two roll "rates" (in weight per unit time): front and rear. There is no disruptive change in the rate of front weight transfer after the inside rear lifts. AND it's likewise not completely right that rear roll resistance goes to zero as soon as the inside rear lifts. Don't believe me? If I'm not right, then at that moment you would theoretically be able to flip the rear of the car with your pinkie finger. Forgetting about gravity? Also, when that inside rear is up, the other rear tire should just be starting to slide.
Sorry - went off ranting a little. Back to your question Gringotegra: What does everyone think about 3-wheeling? They think lots of different things. And if you don't know how to separate noise from data then you won't get far. And if you do then you're farther ahead than most already. FWIW your pics from the inside of T9/12 look just about right.
Scott, who is still learning and I'm one of the most obsessed people on the planet about this crap...
Last edited by RR98ITR; 08-29-2013 at 09:25 PM. Reason: Cause I thought better of it...
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
The thing with lifting an rear wheel is that it's more of an indicator to your setup. For example the dodge neon (Spec Neon still runs at my local track) they lift the left in every damn turn where they're not WOT...
To me it's an indicator of having the front end of the car too soft. If it had a higher roll stiffness in the front, then there would be less roll per G of lateral accel. If you take the torsional stiffness of the chassis front to rear you make the rear of the car roll with the front... the rear roll stiffness tries to reduce that roll also and can only do so much because the weight transfer is going to pull that wheel up as long as the front end of the car (because it is off-throttle, remember) has the most weight transferred to that outside loaded wheel... We've talked before about how the roll rate (degrees of roll per G's of lateral accel) increases the instant that the rear inside wheel comes off of the road. I'd have to re-visit that to understand again the theory but it made [some] sense... So that increased roll angle causes camber/contact patch problems in the front... This is why you want to keep it to a minimum. Due to bumps and our stiff chassis and trying to get them to rotate... we get some lift.
The reason I'm lifting the front in this picture (okay there might be some bumps in this corner but the chassis is still doing it's thing)... is the rear transverse-leaf rear end is too soft but we can't do anything about it without a redesign. So we have to loosen/stiffen the front springs/bar to balance the car... Much like a FWD car where it seems easy to adjust the rear of the car with big bars and crazy high spring rates.. I think the front would need attention first and then once the roll is brought down... then you balance the rear.
Or we can just drive the **** out of what we have as long as it's not a death trap and figure this stuff out later :-)
To me it's an indicator of having the front end of the car too soft. If it had a higher roll stiffness in the front, then there would be less roll per G of lateral accel. If you take the torsional stiffness of the chassis front to rear you make the rear of the car roll with the front... the rear roll stiffness tries to reduce that roll also and can only do so much because the weight transfer is going to pull that wheel up as long as the front end of the car (because it is off-throttle, remember) has the most weight transferred to that outside loaded wheel... We've talked before about how the roll rate (degrees of roll per G's of lateral accel) increases the instant that the rear inside wheel comes off of the road. I'd have to re-visit that to understand again the theory but it made [some] sense... So that increased roll angle causes camber/contact patch problems in the front... This is why you want to keep it to a minimum. Due to bumps and our stiff chassis and trying to get them to rotate... we get some lift.
The reason I'm lifting the front in this picture (okay there might be some bumps in this corner but the chassis is still doing it's thing)... is the rear transverse-leaf rear end is too soft but we can't do anything about it without a redesign. So we have to loosen/stiffen the front springs/bar to balance the car... Much like a FWD car where it seems easy to adjust the rear of the car with big bars and crazy high spring rates.. I think the front would need attention first and then once the roll is brought down... then you balance the rear.
Or we can just drive the **** out of what we have as long as it's not a death trap and figure this stuff out later :-)
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Three-wheeling it, good or bad?
t5 at summit-
t6/7/carousel at summit
What scott says about the rear roll rate vs front roll rate is HUGE. How the car transfers weight when loaded laterally is a big part of this theory.
t6/7/carousel at summit
What scott says about the rear roll rate vs front roll rate is HUGE. How the car transfers weight when loaded laterally is a big part of this theory.