SioneSi

hi all! really happy to have my enigne tuned by todd at church Automotive testing. Learned a few things on my set up and very satisfied with the tune that he did. Cant wait to take it to the track and compare lap times . Anyway here is the set up.

Spoon Flywheel lightened a bit 7.8 lbs
exedy clutch
b16 hydro 4.4 final drive

Stock b18c5 block
oem head gasket
jdm dc 4 to 1 header
t1r 2.5 outside diameter catback
t1r 2.5 test pipe

AEM 3 inch itr cai
itr intake manifold
itr thorttle body
hondata intake manifold gasket
stock blueprinted & flow tested 240 cc injectors by rc eng

b16a2 cyl head full competition head/welded chambers by alaniztechnologies
itr outer valve springs
alaniz inner valve springs
stock retainers
Skunk2 stg 1 cams

hondata p28 ecu with s100

Compression is @ 11.1 /timing is set @ 15 degrees
cam gears from my untrain eyes is +1 intake 1/2 on exhaust
As far as the afr read out i was to excited to test the car i forgot to ask for it. the stg 1 cams and dc headers get sort of a bad review at times but i believe the headwork and tuning woke this engine up ,content & happy


[IMG][/IMG]

baseline in red

218.2hp/154.5ftlbs








Modified by SioneSi at 3:37 AM 8/31/2008

OH_1fstgsr

iTrader: (2)

Very Good set-up. Solid numbers from a solid set-up.
Are your injectors maxed out? More that 80%?
If you a looking for more power the header would be it. Those cams seem to work for your set-up very well.


Modified by OH_1fstgsr at 5:45 AM 8/31/2008

00Red_SiR

Nice numbers. I know that type of dyno reads a little high but your torque number is really impressive. Your build is very similar to mine and even though I don't have mine fully tuned yet, I doubt I would come close to the torque you're putting down. Just looking at the parts, the main conclusion I come up with is the head work. My head is still completely stock at this point but I have some good supporting mods that you don't have. I would be very happy too with those results

SioneSi

thanks. I do not know if the injectors are working over 80% I will ask when i get the chance. I would love to see how a 1.8 smsp header would do but as of now I'm good. My previous set up was 1.6 that made 188hp-127ftlbs and thought that i was satisfied then again nobody is when it comes to horsepower but now i am. For now...

Yes. Power is in the head plus I really believe in the tuners that extract every little bit of it,why i went to C.A.T . We do have similar mods you just have more. Cant wait to see yur results

IntegraType-R

stage1 cams good lord lmfao easily a 225hp car with some stage 2 which i run, this is a good dyno.. i ran a setup actually close to yours with some better parts..

B18C1NMotion

SICK!

get rid of that dc 4-1 and get a hytech replica or pro-fab and retune

nice work man

0mtber

iTrader: (2)

You must be running some high fuel pressure to make 218 whp and 154 ftlbs on 240cc injectors.

For real wheel horsepower sae corrected numbers remove about 10% from those numbers. If you get a chance put the setup on a dynojet using sae correction & post up the graph for us to see the difference

SioneSi

no. not running high fuel pressure. I believe it is sae corrected, i will check. 5 years ago on my b16a2 imade a whole lot of power on a dyna pack 188.8 127ftlbs and people where skeptical and said my b16 wud only make 170 on a dynojet. I did a dynojet run i believe it was 248c and made 181.5WHP and 121ftlbs corrected also, to bad we todd is down so i could show comparrisons. No one replied after that . maybe later on i will do a dynojet run but for now on to the track first thanksfellas!

SioneSi

mtber. fule pressure is @ 40psi. stock is 37 right? not sure but what is considered high? excuse my ignorance ,thanks

0mtber

iTrader: (2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SioneSi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mtber. fule pressure is @ 40psi. stock is 37 right? not sure but what is considered high? excuse my ignorance ,thanks </TD></TR></TABLE>

Your static fuel pressure is probably around 48 psi or so which is fine.
I was just implying that 240cc injectors don't make 220 whp at a normal fuel pressure (40-45 psi), hence your setup is more then likely under 200 whp on a properly calibrated dyno.

Regardless, take it to the track & post up some results. Have fun

SioneSi

I dont think i would dyno again to make a statment that this motor makes over 200 or not. I am more impressed on how the folks at C.A.T tuned and made the most out of it . Plus . I dont have money left for dyno since paying for mortgage owns me.

I suck at drag racing. this is how i shift. bahhhhhh.......bahhhhhh.....bahhhh . But i will sure do lap times at a local road course. comparing my old b16 to the new b18. thank you sir!

one thing i noticed after tuning is how i need a lsd. response is awesome!

c0l7hy

damn very nice numbers, pics of headwork by any chance?

SioneSi

Sure here are 2 pics. I was going to post the before and after flow table on my head but I cannot seem to find it anywhere. Here are a few stats from what I found from my old post.

Its the port work that made a big difference. The Looooooong wait paid of i guess.

Chamber volume: from 42.7 to 40.6
milled the head:0.023
my intake port flowed from stock @0.450 lift 79.5% to 88.5% =cfm gain is @16.61
my exhaust port flowed from stock @0.450 lift 60% to 65.5% =cfm gain is @ 10.15

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

acydphryck

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SioneSi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
b16a2 cyl head full competition head/welded chambers by alaniztechnologies
</TD></TR></TABLE>

so he basically turned your B16 head into a GSR head then??
bump for clean head work

SioneSi

I know they are only stage 1 cams and i knw i have a low quality header but that does not mean it won't make power with the right set up. I got a pm that i was sand bagging on cams. If people do not believe then tough. Im just here to share my experience nothing more as far as the debate between dynos

SioneSi

well as far as how the chambers look I guess you can say yes. Its another way of getting a little more up in compression, better quench area. Some agree to it most do not. Reason why people do not agree on welding the chambers is the quality,correct me gurus if im worng. But I took a chance and its been 6 years and all is still well.

jstrobs21

Nice setup, cleeean head. Lovin' it. I can see those numbers coming from those cams too, I doubt theres sandbagging going on... Haha

What is your vtec crossover set at?

American.Graffiti

iTrader: (7)

That head is art! Even though your power may be overstated, with a simple upgrade in cams it is very well possible that it can become actual.

Fat Chick Magnet

nice

SioneSi

thanks vtec at wot is @4400 but when cruising at partial rpm vtec is at 5700rpms. Air fuel ratio at wot is 13.1 . As far as the rev limit i forgot where its set but I dont see myself going over 8500rpms unless i missshift .

Oh_1fastgsr , Ive been told the injectors are close to maxing out and an upgrade wouldnt be a bad idea. although Ive read about other engines in here that have more power producing parts but still using stock injectors and i wonder how they get by. I think i'll be ok for a while but then what do i know...will upgrade in due time for sure.

thanks again