Crappy track results (JRSC)
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crappy track results (JRSC)
Finally got around to heading to the "local" dragstrip (only 75 miles away), and damn did my times suck. Here was my best run:
60 ft - 2.36
1/8 et - 9.69
1/8 mph - 74.09
1/4 et - 14.99
1/4 mph - 92.61
After looking at a few timeslips of other JRSC ludes, my 60 ft isn't too bad, but my top end is just crapping out on me. Datalogs show my IAT going from 140 F at the start, up to 163 F at the finish. Boost is solid 6-7 psi until about 6k, then it slowly drops to about 4.5 psi at redline. AFRs are good. Shifting at 7400 because the top end just isn't pulling any more. I want to blame it on the heat, but I don't think that totally explains why my 1/4 is about a half second slower than it should be. Any ideas?
60 ft - 2.36
1/8 et - 9.69
1/8 mph - 74.09
1/4 et - 14.99
1/4 mph - 92.61
After looking at a few timeslips of other JRSC ludes, my 60 ft isn't too bad, but my top end is just crapping out on me. Datalogs show my IAT going from 140 F at the start, up to 163 F at the finish. Boost is solid 6-7 psi until about 6k, then it slowly drops to about 4.5 psi at redline. AFRs are good. Shifting at 7400 because the top end just isn't pulling any more. I want to blame it on the heat, but I don't think that totally explains why my 1/4 is about a half second slower than it should be. Any ideas?
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (vinuneuro)
Yes, I've street tuned my car fairly extensively with crome. My AFRs are actually pretty aggressive, between 12.8 and 13.2 at WOT. My timing is also fairly aggressive at 25.75 at WOT. Need to get on the dyno to tune the ignition I guess, and find out what's happening up top. Perhaps it's because I just added the charger, and haven't put on an intake or exhaust yet? The midrage is definitely making good power, it's just the top end feels almost like stock... and even if the belt is slipping, it's still at 4.5 psi, which should yeild quite a boost over stock power.
Trending Topics
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, az, us
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (M2B4)
your problem is whatever is causing you to lose boost.
it should stay 6-7psi the whole time.
sure you could work on your 60'.. but troubleshoot the jrsc first.
it should stay 6-7psi the whole time.
sure you could work on your 60'.. but troubleshoot the jrsc first.
#11
moderator emeritus
Re: (borat)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by borat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes, I've street tuned my car fairly extensively with crome. My AFRs are actually pretty aggressive, between 12.8 and 13.2 at WOT. My timing is also fairly aggressive at 25.75 at WOT. Need to get on the dyno to tune the ignition I guess, and find out what's happening up top. Perhaps it's because I just added the charger, and haven't put on an intake or exhaust yet? The midrage is definitely making good power, it's just the top end feels almost like stock... and even if the belt is slipping, it's still at 4.5 psi, which should yeild quite a boost over stock power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
get on a dyno and do your timing. Just because that is what is on the map, doesnt mean that is what the engine is seeing. Not to mention that i dont trust the ignition in crome to give me an accurate reading. Are you running a boost retard?
i would imagine that your exhaust is hurting you alittle, but not enough for you to be running 4mph slower than my stock internal NA h22a.
I would also imagine that your traction is horrible. Get some slicks or drag radials and go back out after you get it dyno tuned.
IMO there is no point in drag racing with street tires when you are testing the limits of your car.
get on a dyno and do your timing. Just because that is what is on the map, doesnt mean that is what the engine is seeing. Not to mention that i dont trust the ignition in crome to give me an accurate reading. Are you running a boost retard?
i would imagine that your exhaust is hurting you alittle, but not enough for you to be running 4mph slower than my stock internal NA h22a.
I would also imagine that your traction is horrible. Get some slicks or drag radials and go back out after you get it dyno tuned.
IMO there is no point in drag racing with street tires when you are testing the limits of your car.
#12
Something is seriously wrong. I knew someone who ran 13.99@101 on a JRSC Car with I/H/E. Your 60ft time even with the JRSC alone is good enough to get low 14's. Your trap speed is horrible though. I've trapped 92.6X on my car and all it had was an intake.
& I don't think it's heat related.
& I don't think it's heat related.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what's your suspension and tire set up like?
i got faster 60 foots in my i/h/e h23 and the car was on eibach sportlines, koni yellows, and falken azenis. i only ran 15.5 though.
i got faster 60 foots in my i/h/e h23 and the car was on eibach sportlines, koni yellows, and falken azenis. i only ran 15.5 though.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA, Cumberland
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Crappy track results (borat)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by borat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Finally got around to heading to the "local" dragstrip (only 75 miles away), and damn did my times suck. Here was my best run:
60 ft - 2.36
1/8 et - 9.69
1/8 mph - 74.09
1/4 et - 14.99
1/4 mph - 92.61
After looking at a few timeslips of other JRSC ludes, my 60 ft isn't too bad, but my top end is just crapping out on me. Datalogs show my IAT going from 140 F at the start, up to 163 F at the finish. Boost is solid 6-7 psi until about 6k, then it slowly drops to about 4.5 psi at redline. AFRs are good. Shifting at 7400 because the top end just isn't pulling any more. I want to blame it on the heat, but I don't think that totally explains why my 1/4 is about a half second slower than it should be. Any ideas? </TD></TR></TABLE>
What intake are you using? If you are using a Stock 1999 Prelude, the P28 ECU does not allow you to use your Secondary intake runners.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by borat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Perhaps it's because I just added the charger, and haven't put on an intake or exhaust yet?</TD></TR></TABLE>
What do you mean by charger? Super Charger?
60 ft - 2.36
1/8 et - 9.69
1/8 mph - 74.09
1/4 et - 14.99
1/4 mph - 92.61
After looking at a few timeslips of other JRSC ludes, my 60 ft isn't too bad, but my top end is just crapping out on me. Datalogs show my IAT going from 140 F at the start, up to 163 F at the finish. Boost is solid 6-7 psi until about 6k, then it slowly drops to about 4.5 psi at redline. AFRs are good. Shifting at 7400 because the top end just isn't pulling any more. I want to blame it on the heat, but I don't think that totally explains why my 1/4 is about a half second slower than it should be. Any ideas? </TD></TR></TABLE>
What intake are you using? If you are using a Stock 1999 Prelude, the P28 ECU does not allow you to use your Secondary intake runners.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by borat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Perhaps it's because I just added the charger, and haven't put on an intake or exhaust yet?</TD></TR></TABLE>
What do you mean by charger? Super Charger?
#15
moderator emeritus
Re: Crappy track results (JBirch_97Prelude)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JBirch_97Prelude »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What do you mean by charger? Super Charger?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes, he has a JRSC as stated.
What do you mean by charger? Super Charger?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes, he has a JRSC as stated.
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA, Cumberland
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Crappy track results (98vtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol, we already know something is wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ofcourse! Maybe it's his driving or the way he is tuning his P28!
Ofcourse! Maybe it's his driving or the way he is tuning his P28!
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Crappy track results (98vtec)
thats horrible man .... my 4th gen with h22a with just bolt ons ran 14.5 @ 95 with no traction out the hole.. like 2.2 60 fts
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Crappy track results (Pullig)
My best 60 ft that night was 2.28, with a 15.00 et. Something's definitely wrong up top, since that 60 ft time is pretty much spot on for this setup. I'm inclined to think that no one has run a JRSC by itself, without any other mods, and that's why I'm running out of steam. I'm aware of the timing issue with crome, and I've been waiting patiently for eCtune, but it seems to still be "coming very soon", even after 4 months of the same talk.
As for running drag radials, I want to see what my car can do with all other factors excluded. That includes drastic weight reduction, removal of AC or PS, or using special tires. Most other JRSC timeslips I've seen have been in the 14.1 - 14.2 range, with no mention of slicks/radials. If I wanted to hit low 14s that badly, I'd have just slapped on the slicks and forgotten about the SC altogether. Thanks to all who've actually read my post/setup so far and contributed useful info... I guess the next step is the dyno and some bolt-ons!
Edit: Also, not to take the easy way out or anything, but it was hot as ***** that night. New Civic SI's were pulling 15.2's, and everyone knows those should do mid-high 14s from the factory
As for running drag radials, I want to see what my car can do with all other factors excluded. That includes drastic weight reduction, removal of AC or PS, or using special tires. Most other JRSC timeslips I've seen have been in the 14.1 - 14.2 range, with no mention of slicks/radials. If I wanted to hit low 14s that badly, I'd have just slapped on the slicks and forgotten about the SC altogether. Thanks to all who've actually read my post/setup so far and contributed useful info... I guess the next step is the dyno and some bolt-ons!
Edit: Also, not to take the easy way out or anything, but it was hot as ***** that night. New Civic SI's were pulling 15.2's, and everyone knows those should do mid-high 14s from the factory
#22
I honestly think the bolt ons would have a minimal effect on your car. There's another, bigger issue. A stock 5th gen traps what you trapped. You should be wayyy higher.
#23
Re: (Wsteun)
Wow those are crappy times. About your boost dropping make sure your belts are tight on your JRSC. Next time try to get some slicks or something for the track. I ran a 15.3 with a 2.4 60' time and trapped at 94 mph on bald Kuhmos.
#24
Re: Crappy track results (borat)
the IAB would be blown open by the boost but it wouldn't hurt to disconnect them if you haven't already.
are you running with a stock exhaust?
could it possible be that with the stock or whatever header/exhaust you are running you just can't expel the gases fast enough and in the high end and in VTEC you are losing boost pressure because of that?
because if the belt was slipping wouldn't the boost just fall off instead of slowing decreasing?
are you running with a stock exhaust?
could it possible be that with the stock or whatever header/exhaust you are running you just can't expel the gases fast enough and in the high end and in VTEC you are losing boost pressure because of that?
because if the belt was slipping wouldn't the boost just fall off instead of slowing decreasing?
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: owen sound,ON, canada
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think your AFR is way to high ,
my na f20b runs best around 12.9-13.1
i tihnk your loosing some power due to runnign to lean,
have you checked your plugs out ?
id say that along with slipping belt
my na f20b runs best around 12.9-13.1
i tihnk your loosing some power due to runnign to lean,
have you checked your plugs out ?
id say that along with slipping belt