160-170 whp possible on 2000 si with mostly bolt ons??
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Socal
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
160-170 whp possible on 2000 si with mostly bolt ons??
Hi guys I'm picking up my EM1 in a couple days and have already starting thinking of making more power, the problem is this car will be my daily driver for a long time. I want to be able to make around 160 whp with mostly bolt ons and stock valve train...i'm thinking of getting a DC 4-2-1, and aem short ram as well as getting a ctr or itr intake manifold, is what i want anywhere near possible??
#3
Re: 160-170 whp possible on 2000 si with mostly bolt ons?? (specv5150)
you could be close. I would recomend a better header and a good exhaust system! If you want to insure the horsepower then put a little nitrous to it!
#4
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: racine, Wi, usa
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 160-170 whp possible on 2000 si with mostly bolt ons?? (nkkeisuke)
you should read this thread once, its basicly the same question as yours.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1369271
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1369271
#7
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SmokinTheBay, CA, USBiatch
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (nkkeisuke)
u say u want mostly bolt ons?
I say do a little Skunk 2 intake mani, Bigger TB, Header+full exhaust, Maybe adjustable cam gears with some GOOD TUNING i say see if you can do it. 160whp aint totally out of the question. Then if you want more hit up a wet N2O kit. that will do it good luck
I say do a little Skunk 2 intake mani, Bigger TB, Header+full exhaust, Maybe adjustable cam gears with some GOOD TUNING i say see if you can do it. 160whp aint totally out of the question. Then if you want more hit up a wet N2O kit. that will do it good luck
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (nkkeisuke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nkkeisuke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thanks for the help...i want to be able to make 160 whp with stock reliability</TD></TR></TABLE>
You want too much. Your Si probalby makes 120...we'll say 130 to be generous at the wheels stock. I am no expert on B16's or SI's or basic bolt ons but you want 40-50whp from a header, an exhaust and an intake. That is MAYBE 10-12whp right there. I dont know about intake manifolds but I wouldnt guess that it will give you the extra ponies you are looking for to reach 160 without doing naythign to the valvetrain.
You want too much. Your Si probalby makes 120...we'll say 130 to be generous at the wheels stock. I am no expert on B16's or SI's or basic bolt ons but you want 40-50whp from a header, an exhaust and an intake. That is MAYBE 10-12whp right there. I dont know about intake manifolds but I wouldnt guess that it will give you the extra ponies you are looking for to reach 160 without doing naythign to the valvetrain.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Sijray21)
Eh, I don't think it's possible.. Although if your willing to take out your AC & power steering that may get you a couple extra ponies.
In a magazine I have.. TPR (Tuner Performance Reports).. They have dyno's on b16 headers. Baseline was 138.1whp.. Now this may sound outrageous and I don't know how it's possible myself.. But the Hytech header+exhaust dyno'd a 51.1hp increase and brought the peak horsepower up to 189.2whp..
In a magazine I have.. TPR (Tuner Performance Reports).. They have dyno's on b16 headers. Baseline was 138.1whp.. Now this may sound outrageous and I don't know how it's possible myself.. But the Hytech header+exhaust dyno'd a 51.1hp increase and brought the peak horsepower up to 189.2whp..
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (KyleVA)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KyleVA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Eh, I don't think it's possible.. Although if your willing to take out your AC & power steering that may get you a couple extra ponies.
In a magazine I have.. TPR (Tuner Performance Reports).. They have dyno's on b16 headers. Baseline was 138.1whp.. Now this may sound outrageous and I don't know how it's possible myself.. But the Hytech header+exhaust dyno'd a 51.1hp increase and brought the peak horsepower up to 189.2whp..</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW! 51whp from a header and exhaust? How much does it cost
In a magazine I have.. TPR (Tuner Performance Reports).. They have dyno's on b16 headers. Baseline was 138.1whp.. Now this may sound outrageous and I don't know how it's possible myself.. But the Hytech header+exhaust dyno'd a 51.1hp increase and brought the peak horsepower up to 189.2whp..</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW! 51whp from a header and exhaust? How much does it cost
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (specv5150)
160whp is not going to be difficult at all with intake, intake manifold, quality header, hiflo cat, exhaust, cams, and tuning. Tuning is the most critical element here though.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SoCal, USA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (93CX)
yes tuning with the right parts will yield you alot more power than you think! you said you dont want to touch the valvetrain but why dont you get some ctr cams with itr valvetrain? i think you can do it if you do it the right way!!
#18
cute little bastard
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sersey Jhore
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Sijray21)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sijray21 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i guess you could "bolt" on a 1.8l short block from a gs-r, so i'd say yes...it is possible </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah well you can just "bolt on" a turbo so poo
Yeah well you can just "bolt on" a turbo so poo
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SkoundrelUSA)
Just what I was thinking (an age-old debate no less). A mild Greddy Turbo at 5psi would most likely yield the best bang for the buck. Less strain for daily drivers at low rpms vs a roots blower, and more upgrade options than a centrifugal supercharger.
This kit for example includes fuel management and injectors for 3K, and you can find them used for about 1.5 - 2K:
http://www.greddy.com > "Turbo" > "Bolt on Kits"
Anyway, hope that helps.
This kit for example includes fuel management and injectors for 3K, and you can find them used for about 1.5 - 2K:
http://www.greddy.com > "Turbo" > "Bolt on Kits"
Anyway, hope that helps.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Baghdad, Iraq
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 160-170 whp possible on 2000 si with mostly bolt ons?? (nkkeisuke)
JDM B16a SiR-II
Milled .30
Skunk2 Stage 1
Skunk2 Ti Dual Valve Springs
AEM Cam Gears I+2 E-1
B&M FPR w/ Gauge (41psi)
AEM CAI w/ Bypass Valve
Stock Block
JDM ITR Header 4-1 w/ 2.5 collector (track)
GSR Transmission
2.5 Exhaust piping
Chipped P28 tuned Uberdata
Made 164.5whp/112trq
thats my set-up right now
Milled .30
Skunk2 Stage 1
Skunk2 Ti Dual Valve Springs
AEM Cam Gears I+2 E-1
B&M FPR w/ Gauge (41psi)
AEM CAI w/ Bypass Valve
Stock Block
JDM ITR Header 4-1 w/ 2.5 collector (track)
GSR Transmission
2.5 Exhaust piping
Chipped P28 tuned Uberdata
Made 164.5whp/112trq
thats my set-up right now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TeamRED_07
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
10-05-2014 03:29 PM