whats your fav. year?
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (YeuEmMaiMai)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by YeuEmMaiMai »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wait till that trans goes out from all that "Power" then you will be like
OMG $3-5K!?!?!?! for a TRANSMISSION!?!?!??!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahahhaha...you are ALWAYS talking about the trans. haha
OMG $3-5K!?!?!?! for a TRANSMISSION!?!?!??!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahahhaha...you are ALWAYS talking about the trans. haha
#28
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Michigan State University, USA
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: whats your fav. year? (George Knighton)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by George Knighton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I like the '94/'95 five speeds, and the '06/'07 six speeds. </TD></TR></TABLE>
QFT!!!!!
QFT!!!!!
#29
Honda-Tech Member
Re: whats your fav. year? (fighterpilot)
If you want an older, cheaper Accord, my 92EXsedan was a good reliable car, and I still miss it. If you want a newer, more expensive Accord, my 03EXV6sedan is just a dream to drive. I like the look of the 6th gen (98-02) more than the 5th gen (94-97). I kind of skipped over the 5th and 6th generations. Happy Honda Hunting
#30
* B A N N E D *
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've always like the 3rd and 4th gens....I'm pretty sure thats when most of them were still being made in Japan! Thats why the newer ones arent as reliable IMO.
#31
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: sparks, nv, us
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (EASY101)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EASY101 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've always like the 3rd and 4th gens....I'm pretty sure thats when most of them were still being made in Japan! Thats why the newer ones arent as reliable IMO.</TD></TR></TABLE>
err...huh?
err...huh?
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (fw190bvi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fw190bvi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
QFT!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Quit ******* Talking?
QFT!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Quit ******* Talking?
#33
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Michigan State University, USA
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: whats your fav. year? (pos_cd5)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Quit ******* Talking?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Quoted for Truth
stupid ******* newb
Quoted for Truth
stupid ******* newb
#35
Re: whats your fav. year? (D16Z6racing)
94/95 and the newest gen.
i was i had a manual in my 94... the auto is going to throw it self up soon... problems.. maby ill make a tread about it soon.
i was i had a manual in my 94... the auto is going to throw it self up soon... problems.. maby ill make a tread about it soon.
#36
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (D16Z6racing)
I was initially into the 5th generations but cb7's looks the best....I also think their the most underrated...I mean....I dont think they've reached their full potential yet.
#37
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bouncing off of the city bus in Saigon
Posts: 11,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: (pos_cd5)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hahahhaha...you are ALWAYS talking about the trans. haha </TD></TR></TABLE>
I love my V6 accord but daym.. that one repair on my 6th gen cost more that the entire amt spent to beep my 5th gen rebuilt from salvage car running during the last 4 years..and I would still have 1800 left over..........
hahahhaha...you are ALWAYS talking about the trans. haha </TD></TR></TABLE>
I love my V6 accord but daym.. that one repair on my 6th gen cost more that the entire amt spent to beep my 5th gen rebuilt from salvage car running during the last 4 years..and I would still have 1800 left over..........
#46
Meat Robot Invisible
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Big Nickel, Canadaland
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (George Knighton)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by George Knighton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I like the '94/'95 five speeds, and the '06/'07 six speeds. </TD></TR></TABLE>
FTW. Am I the only one who doesn't like the look of the '96-'97 Grille and tail lights? Subtle differences, but enough that made me buy a '94.
FTW. Am I the only one who doesn't like the look of the '96-'97 Grille and tail lights? Subtle differences, but enough that made me buy a '94.
#47
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Port Washington, WI, USA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (fighterpilot)
my $.02
my fav year is definently the 91 cb7. that was mine old ride, almost 200,000 miles and still ran like a dream. the body style is nice, and weighing in at about 2700 lbs, its not to heavy. but, the only down side is, that since they are already 15-16 years old, they arent going to last more than 5-6 years longer, but if you get a newer model, ie the 2007, you get the v6 power and the sleek look with the "luxurious like" inside. brand new, so you get the warranty and itll last for 20 years (prevented something terrible happening). the 94/95 also are good but are to common, at least around here. so it all depends on your price range, good luck in deciding!
my fav year is definently the 91 cb7. that was mine old ride, almost 200,000 miles and still ran like a dream. the body style is nice, and weighing in at about 2700 lbs, its not to heavy. but, the only down side is, that since they are already 15-16 years old, they arent going to last more than 5-6 years longer, but if you get a newer model, ie the 2007, you get the v6 power and the sleek look with the "luxurious like" inside. brand new, so you get the warranty and itll last for 20 years (prevented something terrible happening). the 94/95 also are good but are to common, at least around here. so it all depends on your price range, good luck in deciding!
#48
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mount Vernon, ny, USA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (KillerElfboy)
well in performance mods, i have done an intake, exhaust, and a f22 ported and polished intake manifold match up to a ported h23 tb. Thats all for now. I wanted to do more but might be selling the car in the near future not sure yet
#49
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: whats your fav. year? (khunt0012)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by khunt0012 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
FTW. Am I the only one who doesn't like the look of the '96-'97 Grille and tail lights? Subtle differences, but enough that made me buy a '94.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i agree. not only the grill and tailights but i like the 94-95 bumpers better too....
FTW. Am I the only one who doesn't like the look of the '96-'97 Grille and tail lights? Subtle differences, but enough that made me buy a '94.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i agree. not only the grill and tailights but i like the 94-95 bumpers better too....
#50
Re: whats your fav. year? (pos_cd5)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i agree. not only the grill and tailights but i like the 94-95 bumpers better too....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep, i think the 94-95's look better overall.
i agree. not only the grill and tailights but i like the 94-95 bumpers better too....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep, i think the 94-95's look better overall.