2009 fit iniside/out
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: OC, ca, usa
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 fit iniside/out
can't wait to see it in person
inside
http://video.google.com/videop...hl=en
out
http://video.google.com/videop...hl=en
inside
http://video.google.com/videop...hl=en
out
http://video.google.com/videop...hl=en
#2
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (3rdgencrx)
I am pushing around the idea of buying one of these when they are available. thanks.
Why no rear disc brakes and where is the massive moon roof that I saw in some other pics.
Doesn't the U.S. have the largest market for cars? Why do we always get cut short?
Why no rear disc brakes and where is the massive moon roof that I saw in some other pics.
Doesn't the U.S. have the largest market for cars? Why do we always get cut short?
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (_BEN_)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by _BEN_ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why no rear disc brakes and where is the massive moon roof that I saw in some other pics.
Doesn't the U.S. have the largest market for cars? Why do we always get cut short? </TD></TR></TABLE>
People generally buy small cars here in the states to save money. Not to pay for expensive options that arent really necessary.
If you want options, go for a Mini Cooper.
Why no rear disc brakes and where is the massive moon roof that I saw in some other pics.
Doesn't the U.S. have the largest market for cars? Why do we always get cut short? </TD></TR></TABLE>
People generally buy small cars here in the states to save money. Not to pay for expensive options that arent really necessary.
If you want options, go for a Mini Cooper.
#4
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (corey415)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by corey415 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
People generally buy small cars here in the states to save money. Not to pay for expensive options that arent really necessary.
If you want options, go for a Mini Cooper.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah you have a point. Honda's are in a much different status circle in other coutries than in the U.S.
Sorry for being off topic/beating a dead horse:
My reasoning behind this comes from the 92-95 Si Hatches. The car pretty much targeted the same crowd minus two doors. Had four wheel disc brakes and a moon roof. If they did not have high theft rates I would buy another one.
People generally buy small cars here in the states to save money. Not to pay for expensive options that arent really necessary.
If you want options, go for a Mini Cooper.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah you have a point. Honda's are in a much different status circle in other coutries than in the U.S.
Sorry for being off topic/beating a dead horse:
My reasoning behind this comes from the 92-95 Si Hatches. The car pretty much targeted the same crowd minus two doors. Had four wheel disc brakes and a moon roof. If they did not have high theft rates I would buy another one.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (_BEN_)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by _BEN_ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
My reasoning behind this comes from the 92-95 Si Hatches. The car pretty much targeted the same crowd minus two doors. Had four wheel disc brakes and a moon roof. If they did not have high theft rates I would buy another one.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, a 1995 Civic Si hatchback had an MSRP of $13,640.
Adjusted for inflation to 2007, that equates to around $18,850. Which happens to be around the same price as a 2008 Civic EX. Which is a class above the Fit.
My reasoning behind this comes from the 92-95 Si Hatches. The car pretty much targeted the same crowd minus two doors. Had four wheel disc brakes and a moon roof. If they did not have high theft rates I would buy another one.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, a 1995 Civic Si hatchback had an MSRP of $13,640.
Adjusted for inflation to 2007, that equates to around $18,850. Which happens to be around the same price as a 2008 Civic EX. Which is a class above the Fit.
#6
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (corey415)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by corey415 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Well, a 1995 Civic Si hatchback had an MSRP of $13,640.
Adjusted for inflation to 2007, that equates to around $18,850. Which happens to be around the same price as a 2008 Civic EX. Which is a class above the Fit.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
For the hell of it I actually calculated it and it is about $100 off. lol That is rock solid. For valid points.
I would still opt for those features if they were available.
Well, a 1995 Civic Si hatchback had an MSRP of $13,640.
Adjusted for inflation to 2007, that equates to around $18,850. Which happens to be around the same price as a 2008 Civic EX. Which is a class above the Fit.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
For the hell of it I actually calculated it and it is about $100 off. lol That is rock solid. For valid points.
I would still opt for those features if they were available.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2009 fit iniside/out (_BEN_)
I hear what you are saying about options. It would be cool if Honda offered the new Civic hatch with the options that you are interested in (4 discs, moonroof, etc.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
o.G.A.g.
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
07-14-2002 02:22 PM