best cams
04-14-2004, 10:32 PM
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: best cams (13devils)
For B series, on the Higher end performance level Id say the best all around cam is the JUN 3
On a mid/mild performance level Id say CTR's or Skunk 1's
Thats just my opinion though
On a mid/mild performance level Id say CTR's or Skunk 1's
Thats just my opinion though
Trending Topics
04-15-2004, 08:47 AM
#9
Re: best cams (cleanEG)
Lets see, we've got RS, crower, Jun, CTR/skunk2 stage 1s, and Ill throw in Toda As since thats what Im running....maybe you should look at all the specs and decide for yourself what cam you want to run. I guess ill give you a link to that since you cant find it or whatever.
http://www.allmotorhonda.com/t...s.htm
http://www.allmotorhonda.com/t...s.htm
04-15-2004, 11:48 AM
#10
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-15-2004, 12:20 PM
#12
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (baby99si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by baby99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no one has mentioned skunk 2 stage 2's i would rather get those then the stage1's.</TD></TR></TABLE>
S2S1 will most likely result in a faster car, IF you are running a stock CR motor.
S2S1 will most likely result in a faster car, IF you are running a stock CR motor.
04-15-2004, 02:22 PM
#13
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ, USA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BryanPendleton)
Ahh i see, i just purchased some skunk 2 stage 2's for 500 but i still ahve stock cr. I may not get the power "yet" but for 500 brand new i think it was a good deal.
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?
04-15-2004, 11:09 PM
#17
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago, IL
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (baby99si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by baby99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ahh i see, i just purchased some skunk 2 stage 2's for 500 but i still ahve stock cr. I may not get the power "yet" but for 500 brand new i think it was a good deal.
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
not really, you gonna have to look into pistons
running sks2's on a stock sompression car is just be "overcamming" not only do you not "get" the power yet but it will also result in a loss also
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
not really, you gonna have to look into pistons
running sks2's on a stock sompression car is just be "overcamming" not only do you not "get" the power yet but it will also result in a loss also
04-16-2004, 04:10 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
RLZ stage 2's if you you have a mid/high compression, daily driver and are wanting the BEST midrange cams possible....and also if you want a lot of top end.
they are designed to be street cams...and they are AWESOME. As much, if not MORE, midrange than a toda b...and more top end than a JUN 3
they are designed to be street cams...and they are AWESOME. As much, if not MORE, midrange than a toda b...and more top end than a JUN 3
04-16-2004, 04:24 AM
#22
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles, ca, usa
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (baby99si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by baby99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ahh i see, i just purchased some skunk 2 stage 2's for 500 but i still ahve stock cr. I may not get the power "yet" but for 500 brand new i think it was a good deal.
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
good *** deal, where did you buy those cams for 500 brand new from? can you hook me up too?
sorry for the thread jack but im also getting a thinner head gasket which will probably only bring me up 0.3 but with that little up in the compression will it help out the S2S2's at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>
good *** deal, where did you buy those cams for 500 brand new from? can you hook me up too?
04-16-2004, 04:45 AM
#23
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ej6andslow)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ej6andslow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">RLZ stage 2's if you you have a mid/high compression, daily driver and are wanting the BEST midrange cams possible....and also if you want a lot of top end.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Excellent. It appears the RLZ has dyno tested every possible camshaft, so we can just get them to post the results and we can settle this cam debate once and for all.
Seriously, what evidence do you have to claim any one cam is "better" than another. Any by "better" I am going to assume you are talking about power output, and not durability, wear resistance, mfr tolerancing, tunability, etc. At least display some understanding by saying what they are "best" in.
The word "best" and "better" should be sensored on all automotive boards IMO. The use of it displays lack of understanding and ignorance 99% of the time, IMO.
Alright, I'll get off my soapbox now.
Excellent. It appears the RLZ has dyno tested every possible camshaft, so we can just get them to post the results and we can settle this cam debate once and for all.
Seriously, what evidence do you have to claim any one cam is "better" than another. Any by "better" I am going to assume you are talking about power output, and not durability, wear resistance, mfr tolerancing, tunability, etc. At least display some understanding by saying what they are "best" in.
The word "best" and "better" should be sensored on all automotive boards IMO. The use of it displays lack of understanding and ignorance 99% of the time, IMO.
Alright, I'll get off my soapbox now.
04-16-2004, 01:50 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (BryanPendleton)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BryanPendleton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Excellent. It appears the RLZ has dyno tested every possible camshaft, so we can just get them to post the results and we can settle this cam debate once and for all.
Seriously, what evidence do you have to claim any one cam is "better" than another. Any by "better" I am going to assume you are talking about power output, and not durability, wear resistance, mfr tolerancing, tunability, etc. At least display some understanding by saying what they are "best" in.
The word "best" and "better" should be sensored on all automotive boards IMO. The use of it displays lack of understanding and ignorance 99% of the time, IMO.
Alright, I'll get off my soapbox now.</TD></TR></TABLE>
the comparison to Toda B's were by word from H-T member Casey, he is running stage 2 RLZ's that replaced his toda spec B's.
I was also running them in my ITR swap and saw AWESOME gains.
and there were dyno's done against Jun 3's....with gains of 12whp mid range, and 4whp peak. the owner asked to not have dyno's released...but it was done on a stock JDM GSR. I know that's not much to go from...but it's a best as you got for now.
I just recent;y sold my stage 2's to another member, won't say names, but after they are installed you should see some dyno's
and i'll be runnign stage 3's soon...and will post dyno's from them in my build
btw, i don't work for RLZ...brad and howard and roger are just good friends...and they're helping me build my engine
Seriously, what evidence do you have to claim any one cam is "better" than another. Any by "better" I am going to assume you are talking about power output, and not durability, wear resistance, mfr tolerancing, tunability, etc. At least display some understanding by saying what they are "best" in.
The word "best" and "better" should be sensored on all automotive boards IMO. The use of it displays lack of understanding and ignorance 99% of the time, IMO.
Alright, I'll get off my soapbox now.
</TD></TR></TABLE>the comparison to Toda B's were by word from H-T member Casey, he is running stage 2 RLZ's that replaced his toda spec B's.
I was also running them in my ITR swap and saw AWESOME gains.
and there were dyno's done against Jun 3's....with gains of 12whp mid range, and 4whp peak. the owner asked to not have dyno's released...but it was done on a stock JDM GSR. I know that's not much to go from...but it's a best as you got for now.
I just recent;y sold my stage 2's to another member, won't say names, but after they are installed you should see some dyno's
and i'll be runnign stage 3's soon...and will post dyno's from them in my build
btw, i don't work for RLZ...brad and howard and roger are just good friends...and they're helping me build my engine