anyone seen this in s300?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: tampa, fl, usa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anyone seen this in s300?
So I'm getting some tuning done on the ITB CRX and everything is looking peachy so far, but my data is being played back to me in a funny way...
the values below were logged during partial throttle pulls around 1% to 40%, but they play back out here in the 30% to 100% range. Is there something Im being an idiot about? or is this a legit concern?
Thanks
the values below were logged during partial throttle pulls around 1% to 40%, but they play back out here in the 30% to 100% range. Is there something Im being an idiot about? or is this a legit concern?
Thanks
#2
FSAE
Re: anyone seen this in s300?
What does the log of TPS% say?
In live data view, is TPS 0% when throttle is closed, or 100%?
Is it a factory Honda TPS sensor? Did you calibrate the TPS sensor?
Make sure the MAP and TPS sensor plugs are not switched.
In live data view, is TPS 0% when throttle is closed, or 100%?
Is it a factory Honda TPS sensor? Did you calibrate the TPS sensor?
Make sure the MAP and TPS sensor plugs are not switched.
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: tampa, fl, usa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: anyone seen this in s300?
Stock TPS
Calibration is perfect.
In live data view, while logging and recording, everything looks normal. Only the playback is like this.
Calibration is perfect.
In live data view, while logging and recording, everything looks normal. Only the playback is like this.
#5
FSAE
Re: anyone seen this in s300?
Try rebuilding the map. Reselect sensors and re-calibrate the TPS.
Does S-Manager allow for blended maps, ie: first 8 columns manifold pressure, last 8 columns TPS%? The ITB'd B-series I tuned before all had better part-throttle drivability with blended maps versus Alpha-N.
If the problem still persists, sounds like a look-up value issue in the code for overlay, since live data view is accurate.
Does S-Manager allow for blended maps, ie: first 8 columns manifold pressure, last 8 columns TPS%? The ITB'd B-series I tuned before all had better part-throttle drivability with blended maps versus Alpha-N.
If the problem still persists, sounds like a look-up value issue in the code for overlay, since live data view is accurate.
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: tampa, fl, usa
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: anyone seen this in s300?
It seems that I can have my primary map TPS based and my secondary map pressure based or vise versa- so you would suggest trying this? my vacuum falls right off to zero after I touch the throttle, so it would see wide open during a lot of partial throttle times, wouldn't it?
#7
FSAE
Re: anyone seen this in s300?
For about the first 15-25% of TPS%, you should have partial vauum. After about 25% TPS%, you are near or at atmospheric pressure.
For ITB tune, I usually have vacuum from 150mbar to XXXmbar (usually around 400mbar), then TPS after. The transition (from XXXmbar to XX% TPS) is determined from data logs. Start a data log, very slowly tip-in to the throttle, maybe 1-2% every second. You can shut it down by about 50% TPS% since you are almost guaranteed to be at ATM pressure by that point.
Review the datalog and plot MAP vs TPS. When you see MAP start dropping fast to ATM pressure, look at what TPS% that is. Those are your transition points.
You will want a column every 50mbar.
For ITB tune, I usually have vacuum from 150mbar to XXXmbar (usually around 400mbar), then TPS after. The transition (from XXXmbar to XX% TPS) is determined from data logs. Start a data log, very slowly tip-in to the throttle, maybe 1-2% every second. You can shut it down by about 50% TPS% since you are almost guaranteed to be at ATM pressure by that point.
Review the datalog and plot MAP vs TPS. When you see MAP start dropping fast to ATM pressure, look at what TPS% that is. Those are your transition points.
You will want a column every 50mbar.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
comptechgsr2000
Tech / Misc
7
05-08-2002 03:53 PM