Dyno'd my mild GSR build.
06-28-2004, 07:42 AM
#26
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (racuss6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by racuss6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pretty impressive numbers. my setup is almost like your but with ctr cams. just got everything done yestarday but i think its running to lean. had a question though. was wondering if u did a compression test n wat numbers did u get? i just want to compare cause i think mines seens a lil low. thanks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Compression tests are difficult to guage. It depends on what type of guage you use for the test, as we've had a MAC read differently than a Snap-On using the same engine.
Guesses? I'd say between 200-220psi.
Compression tests are difficult to guage. It depends on what type of guage you use for the test, as we've had a MAC read differently than a Snap-On using the same engine.
Guesses? I'd say between 200-220psi.
06-28-2004, 11:53 AM
#27
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (Manuel)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Manuel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice Work Big Cam's 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The BuddyClub's are actually not a big cam, lift wise anyhow.
</TD></TR></TABLE>The BuddyClub's are actually not a big cam, lift wise anyhow.
06-28-2004, 03:08 PM
#28
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (REVHARD_EF)
good numbers chris..
lol its pretty funny tho. i just scrolled down looking at the pics, and i didn't realize it was you and in the "hang ten" picture w/ the cams, i was like "hey, those look like seans hands", then i scrolled up and noticed it was you. lol
you just need to find a way to get that power to the ground!
lol its pretty funny tho. i just scrolled down looking at the pics, and i didn't realize it was you and in the "hang ten" picture w/ the cams, i was like "hey, those look like seans hands", then i scrolled up and noticed it was you. lol
you just need to find a way to get that power to the ground!
06-28-2004, 05:53 PM
#29
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (JDMPROject)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMPROject »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you just need to find a way to get that power to the ground! </TD></TR></TABLE>
The power was getting to the ground, it was just being lost by the clutch along the way!
you just need to find a way to get that power to the ground!
</TD></TR></TABLE>The power was getting to the ground, it was just being lost by the clutch along the way!
06-29-2004, 08:35 AM
#30
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (REVHARD_EF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by REVHARD_EF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Here they are:
5600-12.8
57-58:12.5
5893-6160:12.7
62-63:12.8
64-6677:12.9
6768--7106: 13.0
7197:13.1
7287:13.2
7372-7641-13.3
7726-7900(fuel cut) 13.4</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm no expert, but the above is probably the reason for your power dip between 5600-6300. You're pretty rich for WOT in the midrange- try pulling fuel in the 5600-6500rpm range to get the a/f up closer to 13.5 or so. I think on the top end it's safe to go down to about 13.0 but if you do it sooner than that, you're just losing power.
Anyone agree with me who has experience with this kind of stuff?
5600-12.8
57-58:12.5
5893-6160:12.7
62-63:12.8
64-6677:12.9
6768--7106: 13.0
7197:13.1
7287:13.2
7372-7641-13.3
7726-7900(fuel cut) 13.4</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm no expert, but the above is probably the reason for your power dip between 5600-6300. You're pretty rich for WOT in the midrange- try pulling fuel in the 5600-6500rpm range to get the a/f up closer to 13.5 or so. I think on the top end it's safe to go down to about 13.0 but if you do it sooner than that, you're just losing power.
Anyone agree with me who has experience with this kind of stuff?
06-29-2004, 10:40 AM
#33
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Springfield, Mo, U.S.A.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (REVHARD_EF)
I would suggest more ignition timing then a retune. Or if you are already slightly advanced then you need to lean out all of those 12's in your A/F ratio. Below vtec close to 14 is good for milage and 13.5 is plenty of fuel to keep safe on vtec. You are either suffering from to much fuel, not enough timing or both. Good looking tourque below vtec though!
06-29-2004, 12:51 PM
#34
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (B20JonLee)
I upped the VTEC change to 5700rpm, and now there is just SURGE to redline, as opposed to the bog-zoom! So much better, and I'm going to get it retuned when the header gets modified, and I get a chip.
Can anyone recommend a good chip that doesn't have too much ignition advance?
Can anyone recommend a good chip that doesn't have too much ignition advance?
06-29-2004, 03:00 PM
#36
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (Solo2Vtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Solo2Vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get hondata</TD></TR></TABLE>
You going to pay for it? If so, I'll send you my addy!
You going to pay for it? If so, I'll send you my addy!
06-29-2004, 04:29 PM
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Broken Arrow, ok, USA
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (DouLik Industries)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DouLik Industries »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yep its a 94 gs lsvtec, full RM head
not sure yet..going to pull the motor tm and see if anything is salvageable! im outta the NA game right now..its time for the darkside lol you know anyone that wants some RM cams?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which RM cams do you have and how much are you asking for them?
not sure yet..going to pull the motor tm and see if anything is salvageable! im outta the NA game right now..its time for the darkside
lol you know anyone that wants some RM cams?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Which RM cams do you have and how much are you asking for them?
06-29-2004, 06:12 PM
#38
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: yonkers, n.y., U.S.
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (DouLik Industries)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DouLik Industries »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yep its a 94 gs lsvtec, full RM head
not sure yet..going to pull the motor tm and see if anything is salvageable! im outta the NA game right now..its time for the darkside lol you know anyone that wants some RM cams?
</TD></TR></TABLE>what were you running with the RM head ...
p.s. nice numbers on the c1
not sure yet..going to pull the motor tm and see if anything is salvageable! im outta the NA game right now..its time for the darkside
lol you know anyone that wants some RM cams?</TD></TR></TABLE>what were you running with the RM head ...
p.s. nice numbers on the c1
08-07-2004, 12:38 AM
#39
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Copenhagen NV, Denmark, Denmark
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDM2ndGen)
what about if there was B16B pistons in it, with a higher compression.. would'nt that be better??
or would it be overkill for the BC III+ cams??
or would it be overkill for the BC III+ cams??
08-07-2004, 10:45 AM
#41
Very Emergency!!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ....Things Just Getting Good..... Reno, NV
Posts: 3,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (allMotor93Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by allMotor93Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
08-07-2004, 12:38 PM
#44
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (kevmi44)
Is This About Right?
Just wondering if these numbers are up to par? I am just a little baffeled b/c I have stock internals and made 184whp. Not trying to take anything away from you, but I am wondering how big of a difference the intake manifold makes.?
Reason I say this is b/c I went with skunk2, but didnt have the car dynoed untill all bolt-ons were done. You loose some tourque, but your top-end will see a dramatic difference
Just wondering if these numbers are up to par? I am just a little baffeled b/c I have stock internals and made 184whp. Not trying to take anything away from you, but I am wondering how big of a difference the intake manifold makes.?
Reason I say this is b/c I went with skunk2, but didnt have the car dynoed untill all bolt-ons were done. You loose some tourque, but your top-end will see a dramatic difference
08-07-2004, 02:59 PM
#45
HT White Ops
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (REVHARD_EF)
Looks good. In the future see if you can find an Uberdata, Crome, etc tuner in your area.
Can't wait to see what the Spec IV's will be like.
Can't wait to see what the Spec IV's will be like.
08-09-2004, 10:49 AM
#46
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (dohcVTEChatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dohcVTEChatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is This About Right?
Just wondering if these numbers are up to par? I am just a little baffeled b/c I have stock internals and made 184whp. Not trying to take anything away from you, but I am wondering how big of a difference the intake manifold makes.?
Reason I say this is b/c I went with skunk2, but didnt have the car dynoed untill all bolt-ons were done. You loose some tourque, but your top-end will see a dramatic difference </TD></TR></TABLE>
Had my rev limiter been higher, I would have made more power. The thing was still going strong until fuel cut at 7900rpms.
Just wondering if these numbers are up to par? I am just a little baffeled b/c I have stock internals and made 184whp. Not trying to take anything away from you, but I am wondering how big of a difference the intake manifold makes.?
Reason I say this is b/c I went with skunk2, but didnt have the car dynoed untill all bolt-ons were done. You loose some tourque, but your top-end will see a dramatic difference
</TD></TR></TABLE>Had my rev limiter been higher, I would have made more power. The thing was still going strong until fuel cut at 7900rpms.
08-09-2004, 05:20 PM
#49
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (REVHARD_EF)
get the rev limit raised... a friend of mine made 168 with stock block and untuned.. but with spoon cams and ITR springs
he ran a 14.8 with a barely slipping clutch, so get a new clutch and u should be in running mid 14s
he ran a 14.8 with a barely slipping clutch, so get a new clutch and u should be in running mid 14s
08-09-2004, 06:37 PM
#50
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Dyno'd my mild GSR build. (tallblondkid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tallblondkid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">get the rev limit raised... a friend of mine made 168 with stock block and untuned.. but with spoon cams and ITR springs
he ran a 14.8 with a barely slipping clutch, so get a new clutch and u should be in running mid 14s</TD></TR></TABLE>
The ridiculous thing was, I ran a mid 14 with a *slightly* bent valve. So I fix the motor, get it tuned, and run a 15.0 with a slightly slipping (high RPM's were not good times) clutch. Just got the clutch/flywheel sone, so we'll see what she can do.
he ran a 14.8 with a barely slipping clutch, so get a new clutch and u should be in running mid 14s</TD></TR></TABLE>
The ridiculous thing was, I ran a mid 14 with a *slightly* bent valve. So I fix the motor, get it tuned, and run a 15.0 with a slightly slipping (high RPM's were not good times) clutch. Just got the clutch/flywheel sone, so we'll see what she can do.