14 k rev
05-31-2009, 03:06 PM
#27
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 14 k rev
$7000.....LOL, he could of at least complimented his lie with saying he invested $50K into the engine.then that lie would've made more sense. how small of a stroke you would need to achieve 14k rpm with a b16?
05-31-2009, 09:47 PM
#29
Honda-Tech Member
05-31-2009, 10:24 PM
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 14 k rev
A 70.6mm stroke with 138mm rod would put it exactly at F1 forces@19K. You'd need to use F1 design and materials to make it work(obviously expensive). With stock bore it would be 1.45l, bored to a max of 87mm it would be 1.68l. If it were built right, I would venture to predict a minimum of 230hp per liter at that rpm, which would make the 1.68l produce 386.4bhp.
05-31-2009, 10:43 PM
#31
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 14 k rev
A 70.6mm stroke with 138mm rod would put it exactly at F1 forces@19K. You'd need to use F1 design and materials to make it work(obviously expensive). With stock bore it would be 1.45l, bored to a max of 87mm it would be 1.68l. If it were built right, I would venture to predict a minimum of 230hp per liter at that rpm, which would make the 1.68l produce 386.4bhp.
06-01-2009, 03:57 PM
#33
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 916 to 206 Nor.Cali Inspired
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 14 k rev
Haha I can't believe that you would even post this.
Although I hate arguing with people when they think they're right when they're really wrong.
This kid that goes to my school said he's sponsered by Monster (energy drinks) for wakeskating. Bull ****. I just nod and smile.
Although I hate arguing with people when they think they're right when they're really wrong.
This kid that goes to my school said he's sponsered by Monster (energy drinks) for wakeskating. Bull ****. I just nod and smile.
06-01-2009, 05:46 PM
#34
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 14 k rev
[QUOTE=Vengeance;38737925]A 70.6mm stroke with 138mm rod would put it exactly at F1 forces@19K. You'd need to use F1 design and materials to make it work(obviously expensive). With stock bore it would be 1.45l, bored to a max of 87mm it would be 1.68l. If it were built right, I would venture to predict a minimum of 230hp per liter at that rpm, which would make the 1.68l produce 386.4bhp.[/QUO
....and it wouldnt have **** for torque. i didnt realize you guys were really gonna answer that question
....and it wouldnt have **** for torque. i didnt realize you guys were really gonna answer that question
06-01-2009, 08:36 PM
#36
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-01-2009, 10:34 PM
#38
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 14 k rev
(I have to use a damn image because this board takes out the spaces
)
As you can see, no matter where in the rpm you make the HP, if you gear it properly it will have the same torque value to the wheels...so all that really matters is horsepower!
06-02-2009, 08:46 AM
#40
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 14 k rev
This thread is like myth busters, myth busted, now what will it take to confirm it.
06-02-2009, 03:36 PM
#41
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waconia, MN, 55387
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-02-2009, 03:50 PM
#43
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 14 k rev
06-02-2009, 06:12 PM
#45
Honda-Tech Member
06-02-2009, 07:15 PM
#46
Re: 14 k rev
no.
the reason F1 isnt popular is:
1. its not as spectator friendly as oval racing
2. the competition isnt as exciting to your average mouth breather. alonso leading from pole to checkers at monaco with kimi in tow doesnt excite a redneck like jimmy johnson and kyle busch banging fenders for all 500 laps
its got nothing to do with the automotive platform. never has, never will. if you switched every single nascar motor to a dual cam fuel injected v8, there would be no IMMEDIATE affect on fanfare and spectator count, and the only related affect would take place when the prices skyrocketed, sponsors/teams pulled out, and the competition loosened.
there WAS a twin overhead cam motor in Top Fuel drag racing, if you emember. i believe it was the mcgee brothers who came up with it, with a poor budget, and the nhra didnt care, but when bernstein made it public he would fund it, it got the axe for the above reason.
the almighty dollar has stifled every form of racing sanction there is.
06-02-2009, 07:20 PM
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 14 k rev
F1 isnt popular in America cuz dem NASCAR boyz in da south don't like no Eureepeeans comin over n racin there little sissy carz.
The majority of the NASCAR watching public is very ignorant/biased against anything non-U.S.
The majority of the NASCAR watching public is very ignorant/biased against anything non-U.S.
