SRT-4 VS RSX-S
01-12-2004, 06:59 PM
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: winnipeg, manitoba, canada
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (DeeBo)
those srt-4's run like a 5.7 0-60 and under 14 secs in the 1/4 mile. All the bolt-ons on an rsx-s should equate to a close race. ALthough I'm not a huge fan of domestics, those dodge's have some crazy bang for the buck.....
01-12-2004, 08:18 PM
#5
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (jamessh1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jamessh1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> ALthough I'm not a huge fan of domestics, those dodge's have some crazy bang for the buck.....</TD></TR></TABLE>
So true
So true
01-12-2004, 08:26 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Island of Valinor, Middle Earth
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (ProJectCvic)
hmmm even though I know SR-T will win, I don't even want to consider trying to race with them at all...no use...don't waste your gasoline for those dodgies!!
Trending Topics
01-12-2004, 09:11 PM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: los angeles / redlands, ca, usa
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was at fontana this past weekend...i saw a handful of srt-4's run....frm what i saw off the line was a big traction problem...the fastest srt-4 i saw which was modded up ran a 13.1..the rest of them were in high 14's...and some in 15s
01-13-2004, 12:38 AM
#12
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WR03Evo)
srt4's are fast in a straight line.. they break down a lot.. it's still a neon.. the car is so stupid.. it has power windows in the front.. and manual windows in the rear .. wtf??
01-13-2004, 01:07 AM
#13
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anywhere, Ca, United States
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (DeeBo)
Come on now, you have to admire dodge for putting out something that fast for so little money. I give respect where respect is due, I have seen some bone stock SRT 4's pull mid to high thirteens. I personally would not own one, but I still respect them. SRT 4 will always win an RSX.
01-13-2004, 03:42 AM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NJ, United States
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (xanctus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xanctus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmmm even though I know SR-T will win, I don't even want to consider trying to race with them at all...no use...don't waste your gasoline for those dodgies!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.
01-13-2004, 04:13 AM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 3,184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (davanca24)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davanca24 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. I've actually lost IQ points and want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading it.
Of course if both cars have the same whp then it's a drivers race. The entire "if it was NA" or "if the Type S was boosted" argument is horsesh1t. Also, the 220 crank hp rating is LOW. STOCK SRT-4's are putting down 235WHP. STOCK.
A HEAVILY modded Type S MAY beat a stock SRT-4. I know there's a guy by me running low 14's high 13's in his RSX-S. There are also SRT-4s running low 13's here too.
I've raced one at the track in my Si and I beat him by like 2 hundreths of a second (plus 5 tenths at the tree). It's a really impressive car.
Steve
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. I've actually lost IQ points and want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading it.
Of course if both cars have the same whp then it's a drivers race. The entire "if it was NA" or "if the Type S was boosted" argument is horsesh1t. Also, the 220 crank hp rating is LOW. STOCK SRT-4's are putting down 235WHP. STOCK.
A HEAVILY modded Type S MAY beat a stock SRT-4. I know there's a guy by me running low 14's high 13's in his RSX-S. There are also SRT-4s running low 13's here too.
I've raced one at the track in my Si and I beat him by like 2 hundreths of a second (plus 5 tenths at the tree). It's a really impressive car.
Steve
01-13-2004, 04:35 AM
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NJ, United States
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (k-series)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by k-series »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. I've actually lost IQ points and want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading it.
Of course if both cars have the same whp then it's a drivers race. The entire "if it was NA" or "if the Type S was boosted" argument is horsesh1t. Also, the 220 crank hp rating is LOW. STOCK SRT-4's are putting down 235WHP. STOCK.
A HEAVILY modded Type S MAY beat a stock SRT-4. I know there's a guy by me running low 14's high 13's in his RSX-S. There are also SRT-4s running low 13's here too.
I've raced one at the track in my Si and I beat him by like 2 hundreths of a second (plus 5 tenths at the tree). It's a really impressive car.
Steve</TD></TR></TABLE>
235 WHP give me break. My cousin has one and we dynoed the car it put 209 to the wheels, stock. Stock srt's the fastest i seen here in jersey was a 14.4
That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. I've actually lost IQ points and want my 2 minutes back that I wasted reading it.
Of course if both cars have the same whp then it's a drivers race. The entire "if it was NA" or "if the Type S was boosted" argument is horsesh1t. Also, the 220 crank hp rating is LOW. STOCK SRT-4's are putting down 235WHP. STOCK.
A HEAVILY modded Type S MAY beat a stock SRT-4. I know there's a guy by me running low 14's high 13's in his RSX-S. There are also SRT-4s running low 13's here too.
I've raced one at the track in my Si and I beat him by like 2 hundreths of a second (plus 5 tenths at the tree). It's a really impressive car.
Steve</TD></TR></TABLE>
235 WHP give me break. My cousin has one and we dynoed the car it put 209 to the wheels, stock. Stock srt's the fastest i seen here in jersey was a 14.4
01-13-2004, 05:06 AM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 3,184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (davanca24)
Then come to south FL and I'll introduce you to them.
A handful at 220
2 dyno'd at 227
and 1 at 235-ish (I add ish because it may have been like 233 but it was in the low 30's for sure)
Steve
A handful at 220
2 dyno'd at 227
and 1 at 235-ish (I add ish because it may have been like 233 but it was in the low 30's for sure)
Steve
01-13-2004, 05:30 AM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (k-series)
Why do people try and compare APPLES-2-ORANGES
Oh well, I guess it will never stop.
Probably b/c we race apples against oranges on the street. Don't we
Oh well, I guess it will never stop.
Probably b/c we race apples against oranges on the street. Don't we
01-13-2004, 05:55 AM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SICK1NINE, CA
Posts: 12,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (GreenBean)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GreenBean »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why do people try and compare APPLES-2-ORANGES
Oh well, I guess it will never stop.
Probably b/c we race apples against oranges on the street. Don't we </TD></TR></TABLE>
its funny and true at the same time
Oh well, I guess it will never stop.
Probably b/c we race apples against oranges on the street. Don't we
</TD></TR></TABLE>its funny and true at the same time
01-13-2004, 06:30 AM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-s
how about a RSX-S with some mods... maybe a Toda kit? That might be close??
SRT-4 will own any Hype-S, no question
see:
http://p1auto.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=22
there is NO better bang for the buck on the market.
SRT-4 will own any Hype-S, no question
see:
http://p1auto.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=22
there is NO better bang for the buck on the market.
01-13-2004, 06:51 AM
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Darryl Musashi)
my 2 cents worth... for kicks the other day my friend and i were out test driving cars, one of which was the neon.
i must say that dodge has done a very good job a hitting the target. we test drove an 04 model which now comes w/ a quaife lsd.
both of us have owned type r's, and now we own an s2k and a rx7 tt.
we were both very impressed. the seats are'nt bad,a little soft on side bolstering,the shifter is not honda smooth but very good. acceleration is nice, not much turbo lag. the built in boost guage is a nice feature. factory upgrades, covered by warranty are not bad either..
the exhaust note is very nice,hard to believe there is not a traditional muffler on this car.
i would have to ditch the rear wing.
all in all i would give dodge a for effort.
however, it is a neon, and i would probably never own one.
now if only honda or someone else would step up to the plate and offer something like this package, at 20 grand...that would be great...... turbo power from the factory.
i must say that dodge has done a very good job a hitting the target. we test drove an 04 model which now comes w/ a quaife lsd.
both of us have owned type r's, and now we own an s2k and a rx7 tt.
we were both very impressed. the seats are'nt bad,a little soft on side bolstering,the shifter is not honda smooth but very good. acceleration is nice, not much turbo lag. the built in boost guage is a nice feature. factory upgrades, covered by warranty are not bad either..
the exhaust note is very nice,hard to believe there is not a traditional muffler on this car.
i would have to ditch the rear wing.
all in all i would give dodge a
for effort. however, it is a neon, and i would probably never own one.
now if only honda or someone else would step up to the plate and offer something like this package, at 20 grand...that would be great...... turbo power from the factory.
01-13-2004, 07:10 AM
#24
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ca, usa
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (v t e c 2 3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by v t e c 2 3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">srt4's are fast in a straight line.. they break down a lot.. it's still a neon.. the car is so stupid.. it has power windows in the front.. and manual windows in the rear .. wtf??</TD></TR></TABLE>
They break down a lot? That's the first I've heard of this please back that statement up.
They break down a lot? That's the first I've heard of this please back that statement up.
01-13-2004, 07:29 AM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx, USA
Posts: 6,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: SRT-4 VS RSX-S (davanca24)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davanca24 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No a modded Rsx-S will not win .......
The 160 base engine in the Neon , is not the same as in the SRT-4 ....
and the new SRT-4 makes 250hp ....over last years 240 ....and now has an LSD ...
I think a type-s with some mods can take a srt-4. When i look at it realisticly the rsx is a stronger motor. We have 200 at the flywheel NA, while if the srt-4 was NA the horsepower of that engine is around like 160 at the flywheel. Now the srt-4 has 220 hp with the turbo. So we can say that it probably getting about 200 even to the wheels. Our rsx-s are averaging 170 to the wheels. Intake, Header, Exhaust, and Hondatat #4 will put us close to 200 Whp or at it. Once you have these two cars putting down the same WHP, the only factors that are left is the drivers racing experience.
But bottom line i feel we have the stronger motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No a modded Rsx-S will not win .......
The 160 base engine in the Neon , is not the same as in the SRT-4 ....
and the new SRT-4 makes 250hp ....over last years 240 ....and now has an LSD ...