ITR Hytech header fit GSR?
#1
hytech header
would a hytech header made for a type r fit my GSr? i have the cat back system from hytech and iam looking to complete it....so picking up a used hytech header from a type r would be wounderful for me only if it fits thanks guys
#6
Senior Member
Re: (Rguy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rguy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">SMTP > *
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
Yeah, I would totally SMTP to SMSP to get a nice header.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
Yeah, I would totally SMTP to SMSP to get a nice header.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Rguy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rguy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">SMTP > *
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Suburbs of Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Justin Klemgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Klemgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...</TD></TR></TABLE>
........................and the debate begins.
Mattj
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...</TD></TR></TABLE>
........................and the debate begins.
Mattj
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Dropspeed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dropspeed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
........................and the debate begins.
Mattj</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nah, I'm not starting a debate...I'll just state I'd rather have the Hytech.
........................and the debate begins.
Mattj</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nah, I'm not starting a debate...I'll just state I'd rather have the Hytech.
#10
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere in MD, MD, USA
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Justin Klemgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Klemgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...</TD></TR></TABLE>
both put down about the same power and are quality headers.
I'd much rather have the Hytech...one thing the SMSP doesn't have is the anti reversion chambers...</TD></TR></TABLE>
both put down about the same power and are quality headers.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Molde, Norway
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (fleasme428)
I would expect around 20whp, after tuning. Some Vafc tuning made 13whp extra on my ITR, for a final result of 196whp. Mugen Airbox and full Hytech exhaust on a stock B18C6 (Euro ITR).
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Pondus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pondus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would expect around 20whp, after tuning. Some Vafc tuning made 13whp extra on my ITR, for a final result of 196whp. Mugen Airbox and full Hytech exhaust on a stock B18C6 (Euro ITR).</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.
#16
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pegging the bling meter
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Justin Klemgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Klemgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock JDM or Euro ITRs dyno in the 170s.
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock JDM or Euro ITRs dyno in the 170s.
#17
Re: (Justin Klemgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Justin Klemgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
max torque....hehe
Stock ITR's don't have 176 whp...
Stock ITR's ring in at 160-165 whp...
You can sacrifice a lot of your powerband and get 200 whp probably, but what good would that be? Bragging rights? A nice broad powerband will sacrifice some of the peak HP but keep you at max torque longer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
max torque....hehe
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Molde, Norway
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (canuck-mx6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by canuck-mx6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Stock JDM or Euro ITRs dyno in the 170s. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Which is why I specified that it is a B18C6 Also these numbers where on a Dynapack, but if it reads high i don't know as I have not tested my car anywhere else. But anyways, the gains I got from tuning is way more interesting than the actual peak number.
Here's the dynosheet btw : http://www.we-todd-did-racing....D.jpg
Stock JDM or Euro ITRs dyno in the 170s. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Which is why I specified that it is a B18C6 Also these numbers where on a Dynapack, but if it reads high i don't know as I have not tested my car anywhere else. But anyways, the gains I got from tuning is way more interesting than the actual peak number.
Here's the dynosheet btw : http://www.we-todd-did-racing....D.jpg
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (nemesis0104)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nemesis0104 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
max torque....hehe</TD></TR></TABLE>
Errr...peak torque...
max torque....hehe</TD></TR></TABLE>
Errr...peak torque...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post