PR4 IM on GSR
10-26-2006, 10:39 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: federal way, wa, king
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PR4 IM on GSR
Cant you fit the integra 90/91 intake manifold on the gsr motor? so you can fool
people that its an ls. Also would I increse flow or would it be worse.
people that its an ls. Also would I increse flow or would it be worse.
10-26-2006, 11:02 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (russianswty)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by russianswty »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah but from a quick glense it would look like a LS,
how would it work? would be a downgrade or improvement?</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, even if you put the intake manifold on your car somehow the valve cover on your car is still going to say "dohc vtec." there is no point honestly unless you upgrade to skunk2 or blox manifolds.
how would it work? would be a downgrade or improvement?</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, even if you put the intake manifold on your car somehow the valve cover on your car is still going to say "dohc vtec." there is no point honestly unless you upgrade to skunk2 or blox manifolds.
10-27-2006, 08:25 AM
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: federal way, wa, king
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (DC2SiR)
you can always put ls valve cover on. Cant you?
and yes ive seen the manifold swap been done on those.
I was just wondering about it.
and yes ive seen the manifold swap been done on those.
I was just wondering about it.
10-27-2006, 08:37 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Newark/Bay Area, CA., USA
Posts: 12,453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (russianswty)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by russianswty »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you can always put ls valve cover on. Cant you?
and yes ive seen the manifold swap been done on those.
I was just wondering about it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
a pr4 or any non gsr intake manifold WILL NOT FIT a GSR head. You've probably have seen GSR's with an aftermarket intake manifold, such as skunk2, blox, jg, aebs, etc, which looks similar to the ITR/b16a/LS intake manifolds. The bolt pattern on the pr4/b16a/itr intake manifold and the bolt pattern on the gsr p72 head is different. You also CAN NOT fit an LS valve cover on any dohc vtec head. The bolt pattern does not line up as well.
and yes ive seen the manifold swap been done on those.
I was just wondering about it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
a pr4 or any non gsr intake manifold WILL NOT FIT a GSR head. You've probably have seen GSR's with an aftermarket intake manifold, such as skunk2, blox, jg, aebs, etc, which looks similar to the ITR/b16a/LS intake manifolds. The bolt pattern on the pr4/b16a/itr intake manifold and the bolt pattern on the gsr p72 head is different. You also CAN NOT fit an LS valve cover on any dohc vtec head. The bolt pattern does not line up as well.
Trending Topics
10-27-2006, 09:49 AM
#8
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (iH8RICERZ)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iH8RICERZ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">a pr4 or any non gsr intake manifold WILL NOT FIT a GSR head. You've probably have seen GSR's with an aftermarket intake manifold</TD></TR></TABLE>
blox looks like the Ls manifold sorta.
blox looks like the Ls manifold sorta.
10-27-2006, 10:16 AM
#9
Re: (dc2rtek)
Just like everyone said, a LS intake manifold wont fit the gsr head. The most likely solution is that you saw a gsr with an aftermarket IM. Also, there are a billion other ways that people will tell its a gsr (valve cover, vtec solenoid, general head design, stampings, etc). Plus trying to "hide" that its a gsr is pretty stupid, I mean, its not like 170hp is gonna scare people into not racing or something.
10-27-2006, 10:34 AM
#10
Re: (russianswty)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by russianswty »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah but from a quick glense it would look like a LS,
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah only to ricers and people that spell it VTECH
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah only to ricers and people that spell it VTECH
10-27-2006, 10:36 AM
#11
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (sticky icky)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sticky icky »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah only to ricers and people that spell it VTECH</TD></TR></TABLE>
hahahaha
hahahaha
10-27-2006, 02:46 PM
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: federal way, wa, king
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (dc2rtek)
ok well ive seen it done and what im trying to find out if anybody acutally knows,
would I be loosing power, or would it improve the air flow.
would I be loosing power, or would it improve the air flow.
10-27-2006, 03:04 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: That's the wrong tone... I'm Skunk2 certified.
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
this is the stupidest idea ever. you not going to fool anybody, you're going to lose power, and you're going to waste money and time to make your car slower. just stick with an aftermarket manifold, and save yourself the embarassment, some money, and your dyno numbers that are low enough as it is.
keep thinking outside the box. that's how we make progress, but this is just not a good idea at all. try again.
oh, and if you want a fast engine that looks like it's non-vtec, *gasp* make a non-vtec engine fast. hint: p8r
keep thinking outside the box. that's how we make progress, but this is just not a good idea at all. try again.
oh, and if you want a fast engine that looks like it's non-vtec, *gasp* make a non-vtec engine fast. hint: p8r
10-27-2006, 06:13 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Newark/Bay Area, CA., USA
Posts: 12,453
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (russianswty)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by russianswty »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok well ive seen it done and what im trying to find out if anybody acutally knows,
would I be loosing power, or would it improve the air flow. </TD></TR></TABLE>
and I'm letting you know, it is impossible to run a pr4/LS/b16a/ITR intake manifold on a p72 GSR head. The bolt pattern does NOT line up, unless you redrill itand do some custom fab work in the right locations. If you have a GSR and swap to a single stage manifold such as the skunk2/blox/etc., you will be losing power with the stock ecu since its looking for the iabs in the stock gsr IM. Once you run a chipped ecu thats programmed to run the gsr with the single stage runners in the manifold, along with the propper modifications, most see good gains with this upgrade!
cliffnotes... LS/pr4 intake manifold WILL NOT FIT a gsr p72 head!
would I be loosing power, or would it improve the air flow. </TD></TR></TABLE>
and I'm letting you know, it is impossible to run a pr4/LS/b16a/ITR intake manifold on a p72 GSR head. The bolt pattern does NOT line up, unless you redrill itand do some custom fab work in the right locations. If you have a GSR and swap to a single stage manifold such as the skunk2/blox/etc., you will be losing power with the stock ecu since its looking for the iabs in the stock gsr IM. Once you run a chipped ecu thats programmed to run the gsr with the single stage runners in the manifold, along with the propper modifications, most see good gains with this upgrade!
cliffnotes... LS/pr4 intake manifold WILL NOT FIT a gsr p72 head!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
