SlicksM&H 101
It's time for some new info.
Tire shaaaaaake: What can it be.
A) Low Air Pressure = No stability on sidewall.
B) Down On Power = Lugging power plant.
C) Clutch = Set to hard.
D) Slicks Out of Balance = Vibration.
E) Slicks Out of Round = Wheel hop.
F) Chassis = Alignment.
Good Luck and have a ( SAFE ) 2004 season.
John@M&H-Hashims
My best time in my XB was a 17.49 @ 79.41 mph on stock rims with M&H 7.3/23-15 @ 20 psi and you can fit up to a 8.5/24.5-15 with a 1/4 in spacers with a little mod.
Modified by SlicksMH at 10:18 PM 6/16/2004
Tire shaaaaaake: What can it be.
A) Low Air Pressure = No stability on sidewall.
B) Down On Power = Lugging power plant.
C) Clutch = Set to hard.
D) Slicks Out of Balance = Vibration.
E) Slicks Out of Round = Wheel hop.
F) Chassis = Alignment.
Good Luck and have a ( SAFE ) 2004 season.
John@M&H-Hashims
My best time in my XB was a 17.49 @ 79.41 mph on stock rims with M&H 7.3/23-15 @ 20 psi and you can fit up to a 8.5/24.5-15 with a 1/4 in spacers with a little mod.
Modified by SlicksMH at 10:18 PM 6/16/2004
Guest
Posts: n/a
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SlicksMH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's time for some new info.
Tire shaaaaaake: What can it be.
A) Low Air Pressure = No stability on sidewall.
B) Down On Power = Lugging power plant.
C) Clutch = Set to hard.
D) Slicks Out of Balance = Vibration.
E) Slicks of Round = Wheel hop.
F) Chassis = Alignment.
Good Luck and have a ( SAFE ) 2004 season.
John@M&H-Hashims
My best time in my XB was a 17.49 @ 79.41 mph on stock rims with M&H 7.3/23-15 @ 20 psi and you can fit up to a 8.5/24.5-15 with a 1/4 in spacers with a little mod.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
John you are one of the best
Tire shaaaaaake: What can it be.
A) Low Air Pressure = No stability on sidewall.
B) Down On Power = Lugging power plant.
C) Clutch = Set to hard.
D) Slicks Out of Balance = Vibration.
E) Slicks of Round = Wheel hop.
F) Chassis = Alignment.
Good Luck and have a ( SAFE ) 2004 season.
John@M&H-Hashims
My best time in my XB was a 17.49 @ 79.41 mph on stock rims with M&H 7.3/23-15 @ 20 psi and you can fit up to a 8.5/24.5-15 with a 1/4 in spacers with a little mod.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
John you are one of the best
Trending Topics
Thanks Guys just passing on some good info for you and I hope this helps with all the ? and let me see what I can do on some pic with the M&H slicks on the car it looks cooooooool.
John@M&H-Hashims
John@M&H-Hashims
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by E Town DSM »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">John i work on XB's all day for toyota. Cool to see you have one hope you like it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I hope you just mean oil changes all day ,, cause I have one too ..
I hope you just mean oil changes all day ,, cause I have one too ..
Actually, i put all the accessories and any other things the customer picks out on at the time of the sale. Been installing a lot of AEM intakes lately i guess people think itll go faster. Cant wait until the turbo kits come out so i can start doing some real performance work.
aafryf: Spin or bubble balance, they are both good.
---------------------------------------------------------
Exv; All my M&H Slicks require tubes, but alot of racers do not use them.
---------------------------------------------------------
ALLMOTORPACMAN; Thank You for the kind words.
John@M&H-Hashims
---------------------------------------------------------
Exv; All my M&H Slicks require tubes, but alot of racers do not use them.
---------------------------------------------------------
ALLMOTORPACMAN; Thank You for the kind words.
John@M&H-Hashims
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SadisticRacing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">John-> What kind of difference would it make running your slicks with the tubes?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Now This is a good ? there would be no difference, but it would be SAFER because if you cut a Slick your chances of a slick going down is alot better then with no tubes.
John@M&H-Hashims
Now This is a good ? there would be no difference, but it would be SAFER because if you cut a Slick your chances of a slick going down is alot better then with no tubes.
John@M&H-Hashims
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SlicksMH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Now This is a good ? there would be no difference, but it would be SAFER because if you cut a Slick your chances of a slick going down is alot better then with no tubes.
John@M&H-Hashims
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hmm i always did wonder about that.
Ed-
Now This is a good ? there would be no difference, but it would be SAFER because if you cut a Slick your chances of a slick going down is alot better then with no tubes.
John@M&H-Hashims
</TD></TR></TABLE>hmm i always did wonder about that.
Ed-






