All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 08:38 AM
  #1  
johnzm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's

well ig ot some manifolds layin around thought i would post some comparison pics of each one

top left ITR, right AEBS and bottom b16








b16


ITR


AEBS


enjoy


Reply
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
kaptr1d's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Default

nice pics. i just got an aebs i/m and i couldnt be happier.

a lot of ppl had said that the cast was poor and that the runners were rough, etc. mine is perfect! just shows the bandwagon isnt always too accurate...
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 01:34 PM
  #3  
Rick Solis's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

The AEBS IM looks more like the B16 IM than the ITR IMO
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #4  
1hotcivicSi's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Windermere, fl, USA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

bro i need ur help bad my car jolts past 8 grand now after i installed the aebs any help would be soo helpful thanks man please
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
johnzm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (1hotcivicSi)

ttt
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #6  
IntegraXTR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,806
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI, USA
Default

nice pics..

too bad they don't make one for my GSR =P
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:04 PM
  #7  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

I see why the AEBS is an improvement over the ITR but can't say why.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #8  
EKhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Rocket)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I see why the AEBS is an improvement over the ITR but can't say why. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Runner length, position comming off plenum?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #9  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (EKhatch)

Hmm. Your real warm.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #10  
EKhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Rocket)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hmm. Your real warm.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Runner angle and/or diameter?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:52 PM
  #11  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (EKhatch)

It's hard to tell runner ID from the pics.

But after looking the pics again, I will be reccomending the AEBS IM from what I see in the design and what I've seen from dyno testing.

Only real downside with the mani is that it's not as bling as the OE or Skunk variety but aren't we loyal to performance?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #12  
EKhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Rocket)

Aren't they plagued by casting flaws?

Granted they are easy to "clean" up is that about the only downside?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #13  
Rocket's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,765
Likes: 1
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (EKhatch)

If you could hand pick them that would be best.

The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.

Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am not. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #14  
EKhatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,466
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Rocket)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you could hand pick them that would be best.

The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.

Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.</TD></TR></TABLE>

1.5%, count me in. lol

Gotta do everything you can when your N/A.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #15  
wHOAlly's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 0
From: JDM ricer land, CA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I see why the AEBS is an improvement over the ITR but can't say why. </TD></TR></TABLE>


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">AEBS
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Reply
Old Apr 12, 2004 | 03:46 PM
  #16  
wHOAlly's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 0
From: JDM ricer land, CA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well ig ot some manifolds layin around thought i would post some comparison pics of each one</TD></TR></TABLE>

u should mention that its the 1st gen b16, the 2nd gen one is much improved over the 1st gen ones, but still aint no itr .
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #17  
johnzm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Sp00n'd Supra)

ttt
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #18  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)

[QUOTE=johnzm]AEBS


Well, I can see now why in an actual dyno test about a year ago, the AEBS failed to better the stock ITR as far as power output. Any improvement over the ITR as far as runner length and position is certainly negated by the internal sloppiness of this piece. Of course, if it could be cleaned up, it might actually work.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 04:02 AM
  #19  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (StorminMatt)

funky..ive only seen it BEAT the itr.........
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #20  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (StorminMatt)

Ive also never seen it lose to an ITR, closest I've seen was it make 1.5 -2 whp more on an ITR motor.

Still the best bang for your buck manifold if your running an ls/vtec with a b16 head and stock manifold. $100 less and it makes a couple HP more.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2004 | 09:55 AM
  #21  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Used2beAb16)

My guess on why it is an improvement is the angle of the runners, more precisely the way they feed the incoming air into the head.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #22  
LoSt is BlaCk's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,697
Likes: 0
From: Just Drank A 5th of VODKA Dare me to drive, Ca, u.s.
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (Used2beAb16)

i like mine...power past vtec does feel better...

i'm talking about the aebs...
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #23  
BERT-O's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,802
Likes: 2
From: FL, USA
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (johnzm)



Thank you for posting some pics
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #24  
johnzm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Default Re: photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's (BERT-O)

np bert

u see the date on the first post?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DC2_MY NUTZ
Acura Integra Type-R
50
Sep 8, 2005 05:08 PM
DARKSIRACER
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
31
Jul 26, 2004 09:15 PM
Bbasso
Acura Integra Type-R
16
Nov 30, 2003 10:44 PM
prada_2o0o
Honda / Acura
2
May 26, 2003 01:36 AM
SpeedPak
Acura Integra Type-R
82
Sep 16, 2001 12:34 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.