photo comparison:AEBS,ITR,b16 IM's
well ig ot some manifolds layin around thought i would post some comparison pics of each one
top left ITR, right AEBS and bottom b16



b16

ITR

AEBS

enjoy
top left ITR, right AEBS and bottom b16
b16
ITR
AEBS
enjoy

nice pics. i just got an aebs i/m and i couldnt be happier.
a lot of ppl had said that the cast was poor and that the runners were rough, etc. mine is perfect! just shows the bandwagon isnt always too accurate...
a lot of ppl had said that the cast was poor and that the runners were rough, etc. mine is perfect! just shows the bandwagon isnt always too accurate...
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I see why the AEBS is an improvement over the ITR but can't say why.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Runner length, position comming off plenum?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Runner length, position comming off plenum?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hmm. Your real warm.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Runner angle and/or diameter?
Runner angle and/or diameter?
It's hard to tell runner ID from the pics.
But after looking the pics again, I will be reccomending the AEBS IM from what I see in the design and what I've seen from dyno testing.
Only real downside with the mani is that it's not as bling as the OE or Skunk variety but aren't we loyal to performance?
But after looking the pics again, I will be reccomending the AEBS IM from what I see in the design and what I've seen from dyno testing.
Only real downside with the mani is that it's not as bling as the OE or Skunk variety but aren't we loyal to performance?
If you could hand pick them that would be best.
The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.
Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am not. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.
The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.
Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am not. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you could hand pick them that would be best.
The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.
Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.</TD></TR></TABLE>
1.5%, count me in. lol
Gotta do everything you can when your N/A.
The casting flaws won't hurt performance unless your looking for that 1 - 1.5% more power.
Sounds like I am a AEBS sales person but I am. Alot of there stuff is really good and I am impressed with their product line.</TD></TR></TABLE>
1.5%, count me in. lol
Gotta do everything you can when your N/A.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rocket »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I see why the AEBS is an improvement over the ITR but can't say why.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">AEBS
</TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">AEBS
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by johnzm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well ig ot some manifolds layin around thought i would post some comparison pics of each one</TD></TR></TABLE>
u should mention that its the 1st gen b16, the 2nd gen one is much improved over the 1st gen ones, but still aint no itr
.
u should mention that its the 1st gen b16, the 2nd gen one is much improved over the 1st gen ones, but still aint no itr
.
[QUOTE=johnzm]AEBS

Well, I can see now why in an actual dyno test about a year ago, the AEBS failed to better the stock ITR as far as power output. Any improvement over the ITR as far as runner length and position is certainly negated by the internal sloppiness of this piece. Of course, if it could be cleaned up, it might actually work.
Well, I can see now why in an actual dyno test about a year ago, the AEBS failed to better the stock ITR as far as power output. Any improvement over the ITR as far as runner length and position is certainly negated by the internal sloppiness of this piece. Of course, if it could be cleaned up, it might actually work.
Ive also never seen it lose to an ITR, closest I've seen was it make 1.5 -2 whp more on an ITR motor.
Still the best bang for your buck manifold if your running an ls/vtec with a b16 head and stock manifold. $100 less and it makes a couple HP more.
Still the best bang for your buck manifold if your running an ls/vtec with a b16 head and stock manifold. $100 less and it makes a couple HP more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bbasso
Acura Integra Type-R
16
Nov 30, 2003 10:44 PM




