Very much thanks goes to Mike! Awsome job man!
12/1 comp on 91 octane.




Fuel ratios were very good 12.8- 13.4 across the board.

Engine Block: '93 H22a "bored and stroked" to 2.44ltrs of displacement built by Collective Racing. Custom 98mm crank (Balanced and nitrited), Darton sleeves, Crower Pro-billet rods, Custom 12/1 compression 89mm JE pistons, Prodrive oil pump, Unorthodox Racing crank pulley, manual timing belt tensioner conversion.

Cylinder head: Ported and polished by Collective Racing, Web Cams custom camshafts, Web Cams springs and Titainium retainers, Euro Type R manifold conversion, Hondata intake manifold gasket, Erick's Racing 70-68mm Throttle body, RC engineering 440cc Fuel injectors, B&M fuel pressure riser and Guage, STR cam seal, AEM cam gears, SMSP 4-2-1 header (prototype #3), ARP head studs, ARP main studs, Cometic head gasket.




Modified by 2point6 at 9:49 AM 11/5/2003

 

Nice! Whats your setup now?

 

nice numbers

 

so is this the record for highest NA H22?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Daboi630 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

so is this the record for highest NA H22?
</TD></TR></TABLE>

I don't think so.

 

very nice numbers. must've cost you a pretty penny tho.

 

its not?!?!?

so.... how much are you off by?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Daboi630 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its not?!?!?

so.... how much are you off by? </TD></TR></TABLE>

I am sure there are other people who have even more power, just that they don't post it up.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I am sure there are other people who have even more power, just that they don't post it up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Eh, they don't count.

Very nice plot - those torque gains down low are insane . . . . +50 ft/lbs. @ 3,500 rpms?!?! What was done to fatten it up that much?

 

So was the first run w/o the smsp header,
or was it before tuning
good numbers

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Daemione &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Very nice plot - those torque gains down low are insane . . . . +50 ft/lbs. @ 3,500 rpms?!?! What was done to fatten it up that much?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I was missing a large amount of fuel and timing. Actually very little time was spent tunning that area down low. I am positive there is more power to be made. I also think I have an ignition issue. I think if I can get more spark, power can be made accross the entire band.

 

awesome results

are you going to go back to tune it again since u think there is still more left?

ever consider ITBs?

 

That's some sick-*** torque!
Nice numbers!

 

so correct me if i'm wrong. but was this a dyno from before and after the smsp on the accord? if so. i think we've finally proved to most people the power that can be wielded through the smsp header.

 

I do plan to finish the tune. I think the manifold may be limiting as well as my ignition as stated above. If I wasn't broke, I might consider ITB's.

 

nice

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMlude92 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so correct me if i'm wrong. but was this a dyno from before and after the smsp on the accord? if so. i think we've finally proved to most people the power that can be wielded through the smsp header.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The header was added as well as fuel and timing changes.

 

Very nice
What was your previous high dyno numbers? It was in the 230's right?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SKDRCR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So was the first run w/o the smsp header,
or was it before tuning
good numbers </TD></TR></TABLE>

The previous dyno session was done with the SMSP #1 prototype. I made 229.6 whp and 171.6 WTQ. Tuning was done. This dyno sheet posted shows the header #3 prototype combined with additional fuel and timing tuning. The SMSP was on from the start.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I do plan to finish the tune. I think the manifold may be limiting as well as my ignition as stated above. If I wasn't broke, I might consider ITB's.</TD></TR></TABLE>

sell your ATR manifold and some misc parts, im sure u could get most of it together

 

JESUS! sick 2.4 liter h22. Good work, highest numbers i have seen in a while.

 

I think this more still has alot more un tapped potential... i definitely feel it would benefit greatly from a decent IM such as the RLZ IM or maybe even a set of ITB's...

 

So in summary, changing from SMSP #1 to SMSP#3 along with some additional tuning, you netted ~18whp and ~11lb.ft. torque??? DAMN......

 

Yeah keep up the good work man
i forsee 200+wtq in your future

 

Great Number Scott!!! I cant wait to ride in the beast again. It felt real fast even before you tuned it. I like how when you step half way on the gas it breaks loose and sits and 7500 until you let off. lol not even full throttle. I feel sorry for your tires now