MY '04 S2000 "Official Pics"
Taken from:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/sho...48580
Some specs can be found here:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/sho...ber=2
(I posted the link I don't want to plagerize)
Thoughts/Comments?
Slightly different headlights, tailights, minor interior changes, 17" wheels, etc..
[Pictures Taken down]
Modified by JMS JT at 9:27 AM 11/23/2003
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/sho...48580
Some specs can be found here:
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/sho...ber=2
(I posted the link I don't want to plagerize)
Thoughts/Comments?
Slightly different headlights, tailights, minor interior changes, 17" wheels, etc..
[Pictures Taken down]
Modified by JMS JT at 9:27 AM 11/23/2003
I'm not sure what camera those are from. I just linked information from the other thread. Not my pictures, just passing along info.
For those who don't know MY = Model Year. e.g. Model Year 2004 S2000.
For those who don't know MY = Model Year. e.g. Model Year 2004 S2000.
Trending Topics
I'm not a fan of two-tone seats, but damn I like that interior! The front bumper is kinda weird though, just have to see it a few more times to get used to it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Greyout »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">8000 RPM redline?
the offset tach is a better design - keeps the redline from being covered by your hand on the right side.</TD></TR></TABLE>
8200 rpm
the offset tach is a better design - keeps the redline from being covered by your hand on the right side.</TD></TR></TABLE>
8200 rpm
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fivespeedintegra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
8200 rpm</TD></TR></TABLE>
where did u get the extra 200 rpm from ?
8200 rpm</TD></TR></TABLE>
where did u get the extra 200 rpm from ?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by visual »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
where did u get the extra 200 rpm from ?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JUN JDM »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wasn't it 9 grand?....and now its 8?</TD></TR></TABLE>
QUOTE=S2Ki.com
the engine is a 2.2 liter with 240 and about 167lbs of torque. not much more.. but the gain hits real early in the power band and sustains all the way through.
unfortunately the redline is now 8200. lowered because of the longer stroke in the larger engine.
as for driving the car. its definitely more punch in the lower rpms. not only does it have the extra torque, but honda has re-geared the ratios to make for shorter shifts from 1-5 and the 6th is unchanged.
where did u get the extra 200 rpm from ?</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JUN JDM »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wasn't it 9 grand?....and now its 8?</TD></TR></TABLE>
QUOTE=S2Ki.com
the engine is a 2.2 liter with 240 and about 167lbs of torque. not much more.. but the gain hits real early in the power band and sustains all the way through.
unfortunately the redline is now 8200. lowered because of the longer stroke in the larger engine.
as for driving the car. its definitely more punch in the lower rpms. not only does it have the extra torque, but honda has re-geared the ratios to make for shorter shifts from 1-5 and the 6th is unchanged.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by georgiajdm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">those wheels look mugen-like</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what i thought at first also
thats what i thought at first also



now for some 0-60 and 1/4 times.