Honda Prelude All Model Preludes

"new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
Final Flash's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 3
From: Richmond, VA
Default "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t?

I was just reading the new SCC and they had a small blurb on the supposedly "all-new" AEM CAI version2. So I went to AEM's site and there it was, the V2.


They say the V2 is improved over the old CAI; it's better, stronger, faster, blah blah blah, yadda yadda yadda, like AEM's very own Steve Austin.

My question is: Who actually believes it? Sure, after someone volunteers to be the lab rat/guinea pig and buy it and install it and dyno it, it'll be really easy to prove or disprove their claims, but who's willing to risk their hard-earned cash only to find out that the thing's spurrious? No $200 ain't a lot of moolah, but money is money.

Since they haven't released one for the Ludes yet, I figure we have time to speculate to our heart's content. Opinions please. The link to the V2's page at AEM is here: http://www.aempower.com/induction.htm

edit: FYI, the price at optauto for the AEM V2 CAI was $266 for the Civic DX/EX/LX/Si and $279 for the '03 Accord V6 Coupe.


[Modified by heihachi, 1:40 AM 1/23/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #2  
EH2DX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

the dyno results will show the power gains. til then, i'll stick with my old AEM cai.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 09:05 PM
  #3  
Mike95lude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish county, WA, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

It's true, the V2 AEM CAI will definately be better than the old CAI. I don't need any dyno numbers, you can tell by design.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 09:06 PM
  #4  
DsITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (Mike95lude)

looks more similar to Injen piping...AEM finally decided to get rid of the skinny *** piping..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 09:38 PM
  #5  
satan_srv's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 3
From: East Village, NYC
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (Mike95lude)

It's true, the V2 AEM CAI will definately be better than the old CAI. I don't need any dyno numbers, you can tell by design.
Exactly go look at a JDM Prleude Type-S intake...look familiar?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #6  
EH2DX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (satan_srv)


go look at a JDM Prleude Type-S intake...look familiar?
that's it! i was trying to remember where i saw this design before... typeS duh.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 10:09 PM
  #7  
satan_srv's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 3
From: East Village, NYC
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (BB1)


go look at a JDM Prleude Type-S intake...look familiar?
that's it! i was trying to remember where i saw this design before... typeS duh.


Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 11:22 PM
  #8  
visual's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 614
Likes: 1
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (satan_srv)

haha dope ... i hope it's not a very big difference, I like my AEM CAI v1. hehe
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 11:51 PM
  #9  
Final Flash's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 3
From: Richmond, VA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (visualvb)

i hope it's not a very big difference, I like my AEM CAI v1. hehe
I liked mine too BUT, the ad in SCC claims increases of 16.9 hp & 14 lb-ft torque on a Civic DX. I think that's enough to make just about any and everyone put their V1 on eBay or in the classifieds on the same day that the V2 becomes available.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 03:50 AM
  #10  
NCSTIdriver's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, United States
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

Whats the deal for the prelude version?? and are they planning on making a 4'' short ram?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #11  
743power's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
From: at the track
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (NCH22driver)

where can you get that type s intake arm. None of the "jdm" oriented shops have it in their listings, not even R&D, which sells just about every part from a type s.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #12  
satan_srv's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 3
From: East Village, NYC
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (743)

Howard from http://www.polepostionproducts.com is ordering some now...give him a shout.

I think I'm going to try a type-s intake along with a Cold Air Extension at the bottom....see if I can get more power than an old AEM...I think the rubber/plastic armn would insulate heat better as well..


[Modified by satan_srv, 2:17 PM 1/23/2003]
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
blacklude's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD, United States
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

i hope it's not a very big difference, I like my AEM CAI v1. hehe
I liked mine too BUT, the ad in SCC claims increases of 16.9 hp & 14 lb-ft torque on a Civic DX. I think that's enough to make just about any and everyone put their V1 on eBay or in the classifieds on the same day that the V2 becomes available.
I highly doubt it can put out that kind of power
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 04:20 PM
  #14  
Final Flash's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 901
Likes: 3
From: Richmond, VA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (blacklude)

I highly doubt it can put out that kind of power
I'm not saying that I actually believe it, but it would be some cool **** if it could, wouldn't it? But then again, I didn't believe the V1 would make over 20 hp on the RSX either...
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 04:41 PM
  #15  
CanadaRed's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, ON/West Bloomfield, MI, Canada
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

Man, that hole's gonna have to be enlarged even more to fit the piping
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 05:33 PM
  #16  
EH2DX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (blacklude)

i hope it's not a very big difference, I like my AEM CAI v1. hehe
I liked mine too BUT, the ad in SCC claims increases of 16.9 hp & 14 lb-ft torque on a Civic DX. I think that's enough to make just about any and everyone put their V1 on eBay or in the classifieds on the same day that the V2 becomes available.

I highly doubt it can put out that kind of power
HIGHLY
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 05:59 PM
  #17  
stoopid215's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (CanadaRed)

dremel into the side another half inch
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 06:50 PM
  #18  
trahsub's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (heihachi)

Looking at the design of the V2, it just doesn't look like it can produce any more power than the original CAI. The neck of the piping just before the throttle body reduces in size leading me to believe the same amount of air is getting into the internals. Sure the pressure gradient changes as the diameter of the piping changes, but show me a noticable difference and I'll buy you a burger from In n Out.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 06:55 PM
  #19  
satan_srv's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 3
From: East Village, NYC
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (trahsub)

Looking at the design of the V2, it just doesn't look like it can produce any more power than the original CAI. The neck of the piping just before the throttle body reduces in size leading me to believe the same amount of air is getting into the internals. Sure the pressure gradient changes as the diameter of the piping changes, but show me a noticable difference and I'll buy you a burger from In n Out.
It will increase the intake velocity....look at the type-s intake design...it's the same idea.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #20  
munscher's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Clemson, SC, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (trahsub)

Here's what i gathered from talking to the guys at AEM while i was at the SEMA convention.....

The way the V2 intake works is it has a smaller tubing that fits inside the larger tubing... kinda like this rough sketch i threw together for ya....

Air flows in from the left and the whole point of the two tubes is frequencies. I'm not an expert on this exactly but the two different frequencies act together to reduce noise and allow the air to flow better.

They did have a dyno plot of the V2 vs. standard AEM intake at the show and it clearly showed more power over the entire RPM range.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #21  
kidaniel's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, Texas, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (BB1)

i hope it's not a very big difference, I like my AEM CAI v1. hehe
I liked mine too BUT, the ad in SCC claims increases of 16.9 hp & 14 lb-ft torque on a Civic DX. I think that's enough to make just about any and everyone put their V1 on eBay or in the classifieds on the same day that the V2 becomes available.

I highly doubt it can put out that kind of power
HIGHLY
VERY HIGHLY
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2003 | 10:36 PM
  #22  
EpDarks's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
From: mpls mn
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (kidaniel)

I believe it. SCC isn't going to BS numbers to people.

Plus it's pretty comon knowlege that AEM's make around 20 Hp on an RSX, so why not on a Civic?

Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 07:55 AM
  #23  
KTeller8's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,954
Likes: 0
From: Kteller, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (EpDarks)

i agree and someone posted in the accord forum bout a sponsor car. well they need a volunteer to dyno and test. give ya a free intake
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 10:05 AM
  #24  
95PreludeSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (KTeller8)

So here is the question.... They only make one AEM CAI for the Prelude 92-96. This includes the S model with the F22 which is also in the 90-93 accord. They also already make the V2 for a F22 on the 90-93 Accord. So how far off would this model (V2:24-6007) for a 92-96 Prelude? or maybe the (24-6008) for the 94-97 4cyl Accord? could the piping be that far off?
-mike-
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #25  
Furry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "new" AEM CAI version2: legit or bulls**t? (95PreludeSi)

a 94-97 aem cai v1 will fit a prelude however its gona be way to small, the lower reving pos motors get smaller diameter intakes than the dohc vtec motors
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:03 AM.