what is the difference between a 3pt and 4pt harness?
I know a 3 pt harness bolts into one latch in the back and a 4 pt bolts into two latches. But why would someone choose a 4 pt over a 3 pt. Also I have seen a 3pt double point release..can someone tell me what that is? This is for autocrossing.
[Modified by Airtracks, 12:18 PM 12/18/2002]
[Modified by Airtracks, 12:18 PM 12/18/2002]
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,200
Likes: 0
From: One by one, the penguins steal my sanity.
I know a 3 pt harness bolts into one latch in the back and a 4 pt bolts into two latches. But why would someone choose a 4 pt over a 3 pt.
Also I have seen a 3pt double point release..can someone tell me what that is?
All harness should be used with proper rollover protection (rollbar or rollcage). And, although a 3/4 point maybe adequate for autocross, it is totally unsafe for high speed track use. For track events, use a 5 or 6 point (with a proper anti-sub strap).
I know a 3 pt harness bolts into one latch in the back and a 4 pt bolts into two latches. But why would someone choose a 4 pt over a 3 pt. Also I have seen a 3pt double point release..can someone tell me what that is? This is for autocrossing.
The double point release you mentioned is just a quick release on the shoulder harness that allows the belts to drop down out of the way for access to the rear seats.
More here: http://www.soloracer.com/harnschrothfaq.html
[Modified by Brett@SoloRacer.com, 1:08 PM 12/18/2002]
But why would someone choose a 4 pt over a 3 pt.
Also, the combined single strap version must be mounted *directly* behind the driver, not off to the side.
This is not entirely true. Take a look at the Schroth diagram about halfway down the page
There are a lot of mounting points labled "okay" on that diagram that are far from ideal (and would be downright dangerous in a smaller car like my CRX where there isn't much room to begin with). I can't see a good safety argument for mounting the single combined shoulder belt off center. If it were my *** in the seat, you can bet I'd center it
While I'm not disagreeing with you, I have to say that Schroth probably knows more about restraint systems than any of us since that is their specialty. I can't see them recommending the belts be installed that way if it wasn't safe.
For cars like your CRX though, I agree, the C pillar is probably not a good place to mount the harness, since the angle would be exagerated like in the "E" mounting point in that diagram (which has a red X thru it).
For cars like your CRX though, I agree, the C pillar is probably not a good place to mount the harness, since the angle would be exagerated like in the "E" mounting point in that diagram (which has a red X thru it).
Trending Topics
Personally on the y belts I feel that the set belt clip holes are ideal unless you dont mind drilling some holes. I would never mount them to the C pillar. Not that you could'nt but it the seat brackets break load will be on all of one shoulder.
What about the factory seat belts? In an impact, all the load is on one shoulder...and the mounting point is off to an angle towards the outside of the car. Rallye 3's mounted as shown in that diagram should be fine, especially since we are talking about autocross use where high speed frontal impacts are not much of a concern.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AWD: Jeff
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
5
Apr 12, 2006 05:35 PM




