Turbo shootout results: BW S256 vs GT3076R
First we would like to thank Dan(Turbodano here on HT) for allowing us the use of his test unit, without this the comparison never would have happened.
My first thought upon looking at the turbo was that it is definitely larger compared to the GT3076r, and you can see that in the pictures below. The turbine on the s256 is significantly larger than the opposing gt3076r, as is the Exducer on the compressor due to the extended tip technology I gather. The S256's 56mm inducer is 1mm smaller than the 30r’s 57mm inducer. The Borg Warner also comes packaged with a .50 A/R compressor housing vs. the Garrett’s .60 A/R t04e housing, both featured a ported shroud.
Here are some measurements I took of the turbos:
Borg Warner S256:
.50 A/R compressor housing
Compressor Inducer 56.0mm
Compressor Exducer 85.95mm
Turbine 75-76mm (odd number of blades couldn’t put a caliper directly on it just a ballpark figure)
Turbo with .70 A/R 4 bolt housing: 21 lbs
Turbo with .85 A/R 6 bolt housing: 23.2 lbs
Garrett GT3076r
Compressor Inducer 57.0mm
Compressor Exducer 76.14mm
Turbine 59.90mm
Turbo with .63 A/R 4 bolt housing 15.0 lbs
Turbo with Tial .63 A/R v band stainless housing 11.2 lbs
The turbos were tested on my personal motor, here are some of the specs on the motor:
block:
benson sleeved 84mm
earl assembled
9:1 cp pistons
pauter rods
acl bearings
stock crank
head:
applied flow port and polished and built
ferrea 1mm over valves
crower springs/retainers
84mm reshaped combustion chambers to 44cc
5 axis cnc headwork
ITR cams
turbo setup:
garrett gt3076r .82 a/r
garrett core 12x12x3.5 intercooler
2.50" intercooler piping
synapse motorsport front mount manifold
synapse motorsport 3" downpipe
tial 44mm wastegate
tial 50mm bov
stock ignition
other stuff:
victor x IM,
BDL 70mm TB,
competition stage 5 sprung clutch
AEM fuel rail
AEM filter
AEM fpr
walbro 255 stock lines
precision 1000cc injectors
kteller 3" with magnaflow muffler
fluidyne radiator
arp head studs
oem GE 84mm HG
here are a few pictures comparing the size of the two turbochargers.
30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on top BW on the bottom

BW on the left 30r on the right

BW on the left 30r on the right

30r on the left BW on the right.

Here is the BW housing around the 30r turbine wheel you can see the difference in area around the turbine.

few shots of the car on the dyno this morning expect more later.

ryan swapping out the BW for the garrett

Modified by mike@synapse motorsport at 2:47 PM 2/10/2008
My first thought upon looking at the turbo was that it is definitely larger compared to the GT3076r, and you can see that in the pictures below. The turbine on the s256 is significantly larger than the opposing gt3076r, as is the Exducer on the compressor due to the extended tip technology I gather. The S256's 56mm inducer is 1mm smaller than the 30r’s 57mm inducer. The Borg Warner also comes packaged with a .50 A/R compressor housing vs. the Garrett’s .60 A/R t04e housing, both featured a ported shroud.
Here are some measurements I took of the turbos:
Borg Warner S256:
.50 A/R compressor housing
Compressor Inducer 56.0mm
Compressor Exducer 85.95mm
Turbine 75-76mm (odd number of blades couldn’t put a caliper directly on it just a ballpark figure)
Turbo with .70 A/R 4 bolt housing: 21 lbs
Turbo with .85 A/R 6 bolt housing: 23.2 lbs
Garrett GT3076r
Compressor Inducer 57.0mm
Compressor Exducer 76.14mm
Turbine 59.90mm
Turbo with .63 A/R 4 bolt housing 15.0 lbs
Turbo with Tial .63 A/R v band stainless housing 11.2 lbs
The turbos were tested on my personal motor, here are some of the specs on the motor:
block:
benson sleeved 84mm
earl assembled
9:1 cp pistons
pauter rods
acl bearings
stock crank
head:
applied flow port and polished and built
ferrea 1mm over valves
crower springs/retainers
84mm reshaped combustion chambers to 44cc
5 axis cnc headwork
ITR cams
turbo setup:
garrett gt3076r .82 a/r
garrett core 12x12x3.5 intercooler
2.50" intercooler piping
synapse motorsport front mount manifold
synapse motorsport 3" downpipe
tial 44mm wastegate
tial 50mm bov
stock ignition
other stuff:
victor x IM,
BDL 70mm TB,
competition stage 5 sprung clutch
AEM fuel rail
AEM filter
AEM fpr
walbro 255 stock lines
precision 1000cc injectors
kteller 3" with magnaflow muffler
fluidyne radiator
arp head studs
oem GE 84mm HG
here are a few pictures comparing the size of the two turbochargers.
30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on the left BW on the right.

30r on top BW on the bottom

BW on the left 30r on the right

BW on the left 30r on the right

30r on the left BW on the right.

Here is the BW housing around the 30r turbine wheel you can see the difference in area around the turbine.

few shots of the car on the dyno this morning expect more later.

ryan swapping out the BW for the garrett

Modified by mike@synapse motorsport at 2:47 PM 2/10/2008
Results are in:
Tests were all done today back to back, there were no changes in the tune whatsoever as both turbos were making the same power at the same boost levels. we used c16 fuel for these dyno runs.
the BW used a .70 a/r turbine housing.
the Garrett used a .82 a/r turbine housing.
dyno comparison at 20psi GT30r is the solid line BW 256 is dotted

green line is boost, blue line is torque

Comparison at 22-23psi GT30r is solid BW is dotted

green line is boost, blue line is torque

both turbos at 24psi dropping off to 23-22psi boost is holding out better on the gt30r but the bw is making a little more power

green line is boost, blue line is torque

in conclusion overall the gt30r consistantly spooled 300-400rpms sooner at each boost level. the borg warner made similar power and at the higher boost levels made slightly more power. either turbo would be a great choice for someone looking to make 450-500+whp. stayed tuned for video footage of the dyno, were still figuring out the software on this new camera windows vista ftl.
Tests were all done today back to back, there were no changes in the tune whatsoever as both turbos were making the same power at the same boost levels. we used c16 fuel for these dyno runs.
the BW used a .70 a/r turbine housing.
the Garrett used a .82 a/r turbine housing.
dyno comparison at 20psi GT30r is the solid line BW 256 is dotted

green line is boost, blue line is torque

Comparison at 22-23psi GT30r is solid BW is dotted

green line is boost, blue line is torque

both turbos at 24psi dropping off to 23-22psi boost is holding out better on the gt30r but the bw is making a little more power

green line is boost, blue line is torque

in conclusion overall the gt30r consistantly spooled 300-400rpms sooner at each boost level. the borg warner made similar power and at the higher boost levels made slightly more power. either turbo would be a great choice for someone looking to make 450-500+whp. stayed tuned for video footage of the dyno, were still figuring out the software on this new camera windows vista ftl.
Trending Topics
wow, these turbos are very comparable...slightly more power from the borg, but slightly less lag from the garrett. they both seem like very good choices...i dont know if i missed it, but what is the price difference between the two?
Its good to see results from this finally...now to send both turbos to a BW Distributor for another run...just giving you **** Mike 
It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.
Mike for taking the time to do this

It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.
Mike for taking the time to do this
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its good to see results from this finally...now to send both turbos to a BW Distributor for another run...just giving you **** Mike 
It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.
Mike for taking the time to do this
</TD></TR></TABLE>
if we have more fuel we would have liked to take both higher but im still running stock lines and a 255.

It would be nice to see a few really high boost runs to see where each turbo chokes off....they should be pretty close, but the BW doesn't seem to come into its element as much until you really push it.
Mike for taking the time to do this
</TD></TR></TABLE>if we have more fuel we would have liked to take both higher but im still running stock lines and a 255.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rota92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Awesome info guys!
Have Dan send a 258 over to see how much more you can get, and at what price as far as spool time goes
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That would probably be a good comparison....the S258 has a more efficient compressor wheel which may add a few ponies to the graph of the S256. Either way, they're fairly evenly matched. My turbo will be a little slower to spool since i have the baller .70ar V-band housing
Have Dan send a 258 over to see how much more you can get, and at what price as far as spool time goes
</TD></TR></TABLE>That would probably be a good comparison....the S258 has a more efficient compressor wheel which may add a few ponies to the graph of the S256. Either way, they're fairly evenly matched. My turbo will be a little slower to spool since i have the baller .70ar V-band housing
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rota92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pretty much indentical pricing, and the BW is re-buildable
That's the #1 selling point over the GT series right there IMO</TD></TR></TABLE>
plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls
That's the #1 selling point over the GT series right there IMO</TD></TR></TABLE>
plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls
Nice. Each has their own high points.
Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable
Good stuff.
Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable
Good stuff.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AspectIndustries »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice. Each has their own high points.
Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable
Good stuff.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The .70ar V-band turbine housing is a lot more compact if you're worried about space issues
Garrett - Not taller then the BW, which is a plus for tight spaces. + Quicker Spool
BW - Rebuildable
Good stuff.
</TD></TR></TABLE>The .70ar V-band turbine housing is a lot more compact if you're worried about space issues
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18Flip »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good tests. We've had plenty on other applications, but not honda..
I LIKE IT!!
plus you don't need water lines...adds up if you're using earls</TD></TR></TABLE>
Good tests. We've had plenty on other applications, but not honda..
I LIKE IT!!
finally the test complete. i remember seeing that BW sitting on the counter at the shop.. try to talk Stallmer into a borg warner turbo.. i bet you could.
GT3076R is a clear winner for anyone looking at performance vs street-ability. A lot more power available while the turbo is spooling. Probably due mainly to the smaller turbine wheel but it shows that Garrett was able to pair a small turbine wheel with a large compressor wheel and make great power. If you are looking for throttle response, the GT30 clearly wins this battle by a lot. Drag racing, the BW unit is a better choice simply because it is less expensive and rebuild-able and in drag racing throttle response isn't really a priority.
perhaps a dumb question but i dont know a damn thing about the BW turbos, the S256 that was tested in this thread, was that a ball bearing turbo?



