dyno my b18c-R
Just in case anyone on this section is interested..
Dyno Jet
2000 Acura Integra GS-R
-JDM ITR swap
-buddyclub spec 2 exhaust
-DC 4-2-1 header 2 piece (TRASHHHHH 2 1/4 collector)
-AEM ITR CAI
-test pipe
VIDEO!
1st run- 182.57whp/129.95tq *the guy didn't rev past 7500 RPM*
2nd run- 187.26whp/131.53tq
3rd run- 187.96whp/129.29tq

Modified by Fat Chick Magnet at 11:59 AM 1/13/2008
Dyno Jet
2000 Acura Integra GS-R
-JDM ITR swap
-buddyclub spec 2 exhaust
-DC 4-2-1 header 2 piece (TRASHHHHH 2 1/4 collector)
-AEM ITR CAI
-test pipe
VIDEO!
1st run- 182.57whp/129.95tq *the guy didn't rev past 7500 RPM*
2nd run- 187.26whp/131.53tq
3rd run- 187.96whp/129.29tq

Modified by Fat Chick Magnet at 11:59 AM 1/13/2008
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by typeR564 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good thing your car isnt loud...when are the 8am flybys gona happen again?</TD></TR></TABLE>
thanks for reminding me i totally forgot about those 8am flybys.
thanks for reminding me i totally forgot about those 8am flybys.
those are really good numbers. Kind of bums me out though. From your list of stuff, I have a lot more done to mine, yet we make the same numbers.
guess I could have spent my money better. Good job dude! What are you running for a tune?
guess I could have spent my money better. Good job dude! What are you running for a tune?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DVC2008 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those numbers are spot on.. Good to know you have a healthy motor.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
thanks.. but i been stepping on it too much lately i hope it stays healthy.
</TD></TR></TABLE>thanks.. but i been stepping on it too much lately i hope it stays healthy.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LDS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, your numbers are awsome!
When My car made 170hp and 119tq I ran 14.5 so imagine how fast your car is. I bet your not to far from 13s.</TD></TR></TABLE>
When My car made 170hp and 119tq I ran 14.5 so imagine how fast your car is. I bet your not to far from 13s.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Propulsion »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you are making power until 9k rpm on stock cams?</TD></TR></TABLE>
not sure i couldn't see since the graph only computer showed 8k rpm.
not sure i couldn't see since the graph only computer showed 8k rpm.
Your car would greatly benefit from a tunable ECU. Your would gain a good amount of midrange just by lowering your VTEC crossover point alone.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LDS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, your numbers are awsome! When My car made 170hp and 119tq I ran 14.5 so imagine how fast your car is. I bet your not to far from 13s.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Comparing internet dyno sheets is far from accurate. Different elevations, different temperatures, and different dynanometers are all variables which impact the readings.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LDS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, your numbers are awsome! When My car made 170hp and 119tq I ran 14.5 so imagine how fast your car is. I bet your not to far from 13s.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Comparing internet dyno sheets is far from accurate. Different elevations, different temperatures, and different dynanometers are all variables which impact the readings.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neo_ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Your car would greatly benefit from a tunable ECU. Your would gain a good amount of midrange just by lowering your VTEC crossover point alone.
Comparing internet dyno sheets is far from accurate. Different elevations, different temperatures, and different dynanometers are all variables which impact the readings. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes you are right. But how ever I feel My dyno was kinda high for the 93mph I pulled. I figured My dyno should have been more like 155 hp given the mph I pulled at the track.
Comparing internet dyno sheets is far from accurate. Different elevations, different temperatures, and different dynanometers are all variables which impact the readings. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes you are right. But how ever I feel My dyno was kinda high for the 93mph I pulled. I figured My dyno should have been more like 155 hp given the mph I pulled at the track.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KaBlookie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">are you sure he revved to 9k rpm on that last run? if you have a totally stock ECU, fuel cut should be at 8600...those are some nice numbers though.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i have 3 dyno videos so I'm not sure which one is the 9k rev. but the last one he hit 9k rev limiter on my jdm itr ecu. thats how i got the ecu on my cluster it hits limiter at 9k.
i have 3 dyno videos so I'm not sure which one is the 9k rev. but the last one he hit 9k rev limiter on my jdm itr ecu. thats how i got the ecu on my cluster it hits limiter at 9k.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Fat Chick Magnet »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i have 3 dyno videos so I'm not sure which one is the 9k rev. but the last one he hit 9k rev limiter on my jdm itr ecu. thats how i got the ecu on my cluster it hits limiter at 9k.</TD></TR></TABLE>
JDM ITR ECUs do not have a rev limiter at 9,000 RPMs - search if you want an answer. Honda Tachometers are notorious for being inaccurate during the upper RPMs.
i have 3 dyno videos so I'm not sure which one is the 9k rev. but the last one he hit 9k rev limiter on my jdm itr ecu. thats how i got the ecu on my cluster it hits limiter at 9k.</TD></TR></TABLE>
JDM ITR ECUs do not have a rev limiter at 9,000 RPMs - search if you want an answer. Honda Tachometers are notorious for being inaccurate during the upper RPMs.
yeah you guys are correct with the ecu fuel cut... but there has been times if your under such a hard acceleration that sometimes the ecu is mistaken and can go up a little higher in the rpm range.. my bro old single cam did that a few times......
that made that on a stock ecu? thats not bad...
that made that on a stock ecu? thats not bad...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iheartktwenties »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">this probably sounds very NOOB-ish
but i thought integra type r's came with 195 horsepower. what does it come stock with?</TD></TR></TABLE>
USDM is 195HP to crank
and
JDM is 200HP to crank
WHP= wheel horse power
but i thought integra type r's came with 195 horsepower. what does it come stock with?</TD></TR></TABLE>USDM is 195HP to crank
and
JDM is 200HP to crank
WHP= wheel horse power
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16B_coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">but there has been times if your under such a hard acceleration that sometimes the ecu is mistaken and can go up a little higher in the rpm range.. my bro old single cam did that a few times......
</TD></TR></TABLE>
What are you talking about? Lets not give out false information.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
What are you talking about? Lets not give out false information.


