Hey guys!

<FONT SIZE="4">M</FONT>y name is Bryson, and I have an addiction. I like to build manifolds, and more importantly of my own design. I'm not just another manifold builder copying the all popular and whored out ramhorn. However, I like to make power just like any HP crazed enthsiest; I just don't copy other's creativity to do it... I made this thread to consolidate the new manifold styles that I come out with. Be sure to check in often, as I'll have much more too offer soon!

All manifolds have these qualities:
- sch40 304 stainless piping
- SLS 1/2" mild steel flanges (highest quality around)
- WG flange of your choice
- TIG welded with back purge
- FREE shipping on all products(48 states)
- Lifetime Guarantee against cracking to the origonal purchasee

<FONT SIZE="4">#1</FONT> I'm proud to announce the release of my new "Ultimate" B series manifolds! This style of manifold is perfect for those who need to run a large turbo yet still manage low boost with a single WG. It's also perfect for Tial's new V-band style turbine housings! The great turbo placement allows for a huge, yet simple down pipe and easy back door intercooler pipe routing. This particular manifold will fit up to a GT40R with ease! Available options: Heim link bracing kit, 3" or 4" DP, and dump tube. Package pricing coming soon.

"Ultimate" Pricing information:
- Manifold: $950
- 4" DP: $320
- 3" DP: $250
- Heim link bracing kit: $100
- Dump tube: $100













<FONT SIZE="4">#2</FONT> The next manifold is my classic EF/CRX specific topmount. I have changed up the design somewhat to angle the turbo too allow for a better fitment with a 3" DP. It now comes standard with a bottom mounted WG flange which saves a ton of space in this already tight chassis. I offer this manifold for the D and B series engines.

EF/CRX topmount pricing information:
- Manifold: $800
- 3" DP: $250
- Dump tube: $80






<FONT SIZE="4">#3</FONT> Here's my version of a divided bottom mount manifold. The turbo placement is the exact same as my ultimate manifold, so the DP and back door IC routing is just as easy. This manifold will fit up to a 40R with more than enough room for a 4" DP. It is available in a T3 or T4 version, and available with 1 or 2 WG flanges. This is the same manifold that I am personally running on my CRX.

Divided Bottom mount Pricing information:
- Manifold: $950 (add $50 for dual gates).
- 4" DP: $320
- 3" DP: $250
- Dump tube (each): $80















Mounted in my CRX:





<FONT SIZE="4">#4</FONT> My first non honda manifold is now available for the 4G63 DSMs. It can fit a turbo as large as a GT40, and can be built with a twin scrowl or non twin scrowl collector. In my opinion the turbo placement is perfect for the 1st gen and 2nd gen chassis'.

4G63 Bottom Mount
- Manifold: $900 (add $50 for dual gates).
- 3" DP turn down - $200
- 4" DP turn down - $280
- Dump tubes are not available for this manifold






Setups to come...

- Prelude H22 topmount (S372 fitment).
- T4 divided bottom mount manifold (S372 in a CRX? Whaaa!?!?)
- Remote mounted turbo kit for the Jeep 4.0L

Stay tuned, and thanks for looking!
Bryson



Modified by Boostwerks.com at 6:32 PM 3/28/2008

 

ttt

 

bump

 

any other designs for b-series? just curious, looks good

 

your design don't appear to be equal length at all?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtrec02 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">any other designs for b-series? just curious, looks good </TD></TR></TABLE>

Right now, I just have the two. But I have the T3/T4 divided manifolds coming soon.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by parislohan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your design don't appear to be equal length at all?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nope, it's not.

I've been researching this concept for over the past three months, and have found no conclusive evidence that equal length runners on a turbo manifold account for any huge gains. If your looking for an extra 10hp at a 700whp level, equal length might be the way to go, but for most people the manifold will be just fine. The real benefits for this manifold is the short overall length, and the WG prioritized design.

Some un-edited quotes to back up my research:

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ben Strader from EFI university &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">From earlier testing, I have not seen any overwhelming advantage to having all pipes of equal length on a turbocharged engine. The biggest difference seems to be in the overall length of the system.</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tony Palo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you're concerned with 5-10hp difference between that and an equal length, then don't do it, but i doubt you're in that situation. I doubt there will be any more power loss than that...

Runner length has much less effect on runner efficiency than actual flow. These manifolds with jacked up collectors, and/or no real collector will effect flow much more than a shorter runner. I wouldn't expect to see much difference in the knock limit on any of the cylinders. </TD></TR></TABLE>

If the two biggest names in aftermarket engine tuning agree on this account, I'm a beleiver.

 

it would seem your Ultimate B would require a bit of work to achieve equal length but your EF Top mount could easily have been much more equal length though...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by parislohan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it would seem your Ultimate B would require a bit of work to achieve equal length but your EF Top mount could easily have been much more equal length though...</TD></TR></TABLE>

Its close enough to being equal length that you wouldn't see any difference in performance VS one that was built equal length. I doubt you'd see much difference (at all) with the ultimate as well.

 

yah but if it was true equal length that'd be an extra selling point. just a thought that's all.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by parislohan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yah but if it was true equal length that'd be an extra selling point. just a thought that's all. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I'd rather spread the truth that equal length is grossly overrated.

 

So how long b4 the Jeep 4.0L turbo manifold is ready?

thanks

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by djtsmith007 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So how long b4 the Jeep 4.0L turbo manifold is ready?

thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>

Probubly a couple months. It's not actually going to be a manifold though. The setup will replace the factory cat with a slip on turbo connection. The kit will include a 3" DP, turbo mounting bracket, 2" charge pipe, and slip on turbine inlet.

It'll basiclly be an inexpensive yet effective and safe way to get a turbo onto a Jeep.

I was pretty disgusted with the 505performance turbo kit for the Jeep, so I decided I'd build my own.

 

TTT

 

PMs replied!

 

bump

 

Thanks man.

Here's a couple 's for risking your *** over there.

 

just build me a sexy manifold and that will be enough.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatchboy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> just build me a sexy manifold and that will be enough. </TD></TR></TABLE>

For sure man.

 

BUMP

 

bumpppp for bryson.

 

Thanks man! PM sent btw

 

PMs replied.

 

bump for my manifold!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatchboy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bump for my manifold!</TD></TR></TABLE>


Hell ya! Manifold's done, and DP in build.

 

BUMP