Edelbrock has come out with their Performer X manifold for the B-Series engines now.

http://www.edelbrock.com/sport...shtml




They have had this manifold out for the D-Series engines for a while now. I like the fact that their products are known to be of good quality perform well.

Another company I have yet to hear anything at all about is BBK. They also have a manifold (Similar to the Victor X) that has been out for quite some time but have not gotten much publicity.

 

The manifold looks nice.

Give it a shot, and see if you make a dollar.

- Derek

 

in for the input on the BBK

 

some other stuff on their site

DA/ACURA B-SERIES MANIFOLDS
The Performer X intake manifolds for Acura and Honda's are engineered for street/strip applications where peak torque and horsepower gains are realized between 4500-8200 RPM. The larger-than-stock plenum volume and 9" runner length are tuned for producing peak power at high RPM. The Performer X Series manifold is ideal for all-motor and turbo applications. May be upgraded to an eight-injector system by purchasing a secondary fuel rail kit and drilling through the partially machined secondary injector bosses.



secondary fuel rail


anybody running either of these?

 

Price?

 

Found it on Summit's site

~$333

 

Can be had for cheaper through H-T vendor RogueWorks PM them for price.

 

I would test it.

 

i plan on a IM test between the JG sheetmetal that was bought for my motor specifically and a edelbrock victor X sometime this coming season.

 

In for the dyno

 

I ordered the manifold today and will have it looked over by one wiser than I. I tried to get more pictures before ordering but it does not seem that anyone is stocking it.


Any thoughts on the throttle body placement?
Reminds me of the K series manifolds.

Any thoughts on the secondary fuel rail?
I have been thinking about ordering the rail and using it for my primary injector location, capping off the other location.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Natural Aspirations &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Any thoughts on the secondary fuel rail?
I have been thinking about ordering the rail and using it for my primary injector location, capping off the other location.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Definitely a good idea.

 

Is it a custom rail? I think it is a good idea.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DonF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is it a custom rail? I think it is a good idea.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm pretty sure the secondary rail is an option when you order the manifold.

 

yeah ive like the performer than the victor. in for tests of the performer x

 

Here is a pic of the fitment








Modified by Trooper at 9:22 AM 8/7/2007

 

that plenum is alot bigger than i thought it was. looks to be good for all RPM ranges.

 

actually its a Hy-Tech side exit off of the skunk2 integra when it was the first amm motor car in the 10's.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Trooper &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">actually its a Hy-Tech side exit off of the skunk2 integra when it was the first amm motor car in the 10's. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I almost scooped that thing up when you had it up for sale.

 

i remember seeing that thing too, i wanted it.

 

i think i might buy it. ahah. im loving the 2nd set of injectors. only thing that bugs me is the runners look a little long for a high revving application. i guess they didn't want another victor x.

 

if they wanted another victor X wouldnt you think they would have re released it.

 

the performer x is definatly a street manifold. it made peak hp around 8500 but BOAT lods of tq over the voctor x below 6k.

 

I wonder how it would stack up against a ported ITR IM...

 

i think it might be perfect for my 404s