Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #1  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel?

Maybe this should be a sticky at the top, because there seems to be a plethora of mixed information going around, just like the whole "which cams are better" debates. I want to hear from the people that have EXPERIENCE with different flywheels, not what you heard through the grapevine.

I hear all the talk about the different flywheels on the market, and from what I have seen through searching, is that the CM 7.5lb flywheel is the best bang for the buck out there in terms of weight to price. The lightest I have seen is the Comptech, around 6.5lbs but it costs a hell of a lot more than the CM.

Yet, nobody seems to recommend the CM flywheel, and Im not sure why. Im pretty sure its the same as the Fidanza flywheel, but for some reason people recommend that one over the CM. Ive also seen the Spoon pretty cheap compared to others, but then people recommend the Toda because they take out more weight from the outside of the flywheel, because apparently thats where mass matters more. But the Toda is chromoly, and the CM is billet aluminum, Spoon I have no idea what its made out of...Ive heard aluminum is better?

And Ive also heard different stories about losing torque off the line. Is that true?? Or can you make up for that by revving it out a little more during the launch? I plan to drag my car from time to time, just to see what she can do, but Im more interested in screaming throug VTEC down some curvy back roads.

Can someone give some valid reasons why I or anyone else should avoid the CM flywheel? Money is definitely an issue for me, so the CM deal seems like a steal. I dont have the hookups that others do, so I have to pay full price($450 or more) for a damn flywheel. Hopefully some of you techies wont just look at this as another lame "flywheel post" and try to give some serious input as to what you think, what you know, or what you would do. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 01:54 PM
  #2  
Malice's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (RTW DC2)

CM is aluminum i believe. if u get a flywheel make sure is chomoly (sp) and not aluminum. its stronger than aluminum


[Modified by MaliceGSR, 10:54 PM 5/17/2002]
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
RagingAngel's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 1
From: The Dirty Hotness
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (MaliceGSR)

RA who is gonna duck and hide when sgT reads this and promptly makes fun of the above post from Malice....

You are making aluminum flywheels sound like they are made from melted down beer cans or something!

Mike K uses the comptech one and loves the 6.5lb weight.... a host of other use the Fidanza.... CM is the Fidanza unit from what I know....

In my eyes, lighter the flywheel the better...

You hear everybody talk about getting lightened crank pulleys, getting the OS/ATS clutch kit which is the Super Single and weighs next to nothing for that rotating assembly.

Well I don't have 1200 (just a number I'm throwing up) to spend on a clutch I will not be comfortable driving everyday... why is everybody downing "superlight" flywheels.....?

RA who will soon have a nice Spoon Sports flywheel paperweight for sale!

Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #4  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (MaliceGSR)

CM is aluminum i believe. if u get a flywheel make sure is chomoly (sp) and not aluminum. its stronger than aluminum


[Modified by MaliceGSR, 10:54 PM 5/17/2002]
Straight from the mouth of the ignorant.

Anyway, I say fidanza because its a hair lighter than the CM from my experience.
CM, Fidanza, comptech are all good, and ALL lighter than chrome moly.
I've had chrome moly steel flywheels and they were nice, but the aluminum
ones are leaps and bounds over their steel counterparts. Revs are faster and
no compromise in strength despite what people may think.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
norice's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (RagingAngel)

The RealTime guys used Comptech aluminum flywheels for several seasons (standing starts and all).

That is all the proof I need.

An the Comptech piece can be had for $400 and is about 1 lb lighter than the CM. I can't think of a better place to save 1lb in a car than on the flywheel.

There really should be no debate about this. If Comptech moved to JDM land, there would be no debate at all.


[Modified by norice, 3:11 PM 5/17/2002]
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
reefer_bob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
From: NorCal, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (sgT)

I have the Comptech Aluminum Flywheel. It weighs 6.75 lbs, and is the lightest available. I love it. There are absoulty no problems driving it on the street. My butt dyno felt no difference in a loss of torque. It's a great purchase! My friend has the same flywheel in an SC'ed LS. He beats the hell out of that car. I drive my car hard. No problems at all.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:17 PM
  #7  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (reefer_bob)

comptech denies it but i swear its a fidanza. same weight and all.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:18 PM
  #8  
vtecvoodoo's Avatar
Future Texas Boy
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,026
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Redneck
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (MaliceGSR)



haha ken
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:19 PM
  #9  
norice's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (sgT)

comptech denies it but i swear its a fidanza. same weight and all.
I would love to know if this is the case. Would save me $100. It is eactly 6.75lbs too?
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (norice)

yeah, same weight.
CM is like 7.X lbs tho
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:20 PM
  #11  
hooptie157's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (vtecvoodoo)



haha ken

I love that OWNED one
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
Misfit's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: York, Pa
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (reefer_bob)

i just got the toda flywheel. i have no opinions on it. it looks nice but then again i will never see it again once its on the car.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:24 PM
  #13  
Malice's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (vtecvoodoo)



haha ken

yea, seriously....but hey, its a learning experience. i can take it.


[Modified by MaliceGSR, 11:24 PM 5/17/2002]
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 02:25 PM
  #14  
JimmieD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Upper Deerfield Twp., NJ, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (reefer_bob)

i have many friends that use the clutchmasters f/w adn that is exactly what i will use when it comes time to replace my clutch assembly
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 04:15 PM
  #15  
Dr Pooface's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 1
From: Vancity, b.c, CANADA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (JimmieD)

I have the CM unit. I like it.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 04:26 PM
  #16  
MK Ultra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
From: too close to Oklahoma
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (RTW DC2)

Even $450 is a pretty good deal when you consider how much a lightweight flywheel does for your car (people spend way more than that for exhaust systems that do next to nothing, after all). I currently have a 10 lb. JUN flywheel, and it was one of the best things I have ever put on my car. It is about to be replaced with an 8.6 lb. Toda one though.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 05:14 PM
  #17  
DB2-R81's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (MK Ultra)

Fidanza makes CM flywheels, they are the same weight and construction no mater what you have read elsewhere these are facts! There is no difference beyond the name they are sold under!
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 06:38 PM
  #18  
crxb18c5's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: oranjestad, fl, aruba
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (DB1-R81)

cm suck's
fidanza hold have it in my c5 and makes 200.8 and drive it daily no problems
Ive seen cm cluch and flywheels fail with the integra they sponsor with the h22
in the nhra summit series
now there testing with a twin disk
hhahahha
just get tilton!
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 06:59 PM
  #19  
Eric R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Race Town, FL, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (crxb18c5)

cm suck's
fidanza hold have it in my c5 and makes 200.8 and drive it daily no problems
Ive seen cm cluch and flywheels fail with the integra they sponsor with the h22
in the nhra summit series
now there testing with a twin disk
hhahahha
just get tilton!
How someone can say that a flywheel sucks?
Was it out of balance?
As long as it's lighter than stock, it doesn't suck.
The problems were with the clutch, not the flywheel. IMHO.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 07:20 PM
  #20  
nugget8000's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Laramie, Wyoming, USA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? ('01ITR#950)

I have had a CM for 9 months now and I have had no problems with it.

BTW, it is impossible to loose torque by changing to a lighter flywheel. What people are referring to is how a lighter flywheel doesn't transfer as much energy in the form of inertia to the drive train as a heavier flywheel when the clutch is engaged. This causes the clutch engagement to be more sensitive. Somehow people percieve this as a loss in low end torque. It is something you will get used to. Everyone who has ever driven my car has had no problem with my clutch/flywheel. It is just something else to get used to, like a driving a car without power steering. After a while, you just get used to it and you don't even notice it. HTH.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 08:20 PM
  #21  
Honda318dx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 1
From: Culpeper, VA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (nugget8000)

I have had a CM for 9 months now and I have had no problems with it.

BTW, it is impossible to loose torque by changing to a lighter flywheel. What people are referring to is how a lighter flywheel doesn't transfer as much energy in the form of inertia to the drive train as a heavier flywheel when the clutch is engaged. This causes the clutch engagement to be more sensitive. Somehow people percieve this as a loss in low end torque. It is something you will get used to. Everyone who has ever driven my car has had no problem with my clutch/flywheel. It is just something else to get used to, like a driving a car without power steering. After a while, you just get used to it and you don't even notice it. HTH.
Well said

BTW, check out http://www.groupbuycenter.com for great prices right now on CM flywheels, I just got mine for a prelude fore 310$ shipped...
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 08:33 PM
  #22  
YelLowITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (RTW DC2)

dude, that's the thing i never save money for those kind of stuffs( maybe i'm just lazy) get a jun extra light flywheel, but it's kind of expensive tho. about 450-480...
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 10:40 PM
  #23  
Austin's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: Sears Point, CA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (sgT)

comptech denies it but i swear its a fidanza. same weight and all.
That's what I thought too...until I saw them produced at Comptech, everything except the ring gear is made in house by Comptech. The Clutchmaster's Al flywheel is available at http://www.groupbuycenter.com for ~$310 shipped...guess which on I'll have?
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 11:40 PM
  #24  
MugenDC2R's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (nugget8000)

Indulge me here for a sec...if chromoly is so bad then why:

1) Do all Japanese tuners, even factory ones like NISMO and MAZDASPEED, make their flywheels from chromoly?

2) Why all European tuners use chromoly flywheels?

3) If chromoly sucks so bad then why does the new DC5 Integra Type-R use a chromoly flywheel stock from Honda? If aluminum is so good, why would Honda use chromoly?

4) Comptech's had aluminum flywheels for years, but now they're offering chromoly ones too.

I'm more interested in knowing what you all think of number 3.
Reply
Old May 17, 2002 | 11:48 PM
  #25  
Austin's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 0
From: Sears Point, CA
Default Re: Flywheels 101, and reasons I SHOULDNT go with a CM lightweight flywheel? (MugenDC2R)

Indulge me here for a sec...if chromoly is so bad then why:

4) Comptech's had aluminum flywheels for years, but now they're offering chromoly ones too.
I asked them this...they said that becuase of the negative publicity that Al flywheel's had due to a few manufacturers making sub-par products they felt that they were missing out on selling their products...the market demanded that they produce a Chromolly flywheel, so they did. Give them a call and ask them what they have installed on their car...I'm willing to be that all of them that have aftermarket flywheels will have the Al version installed...

Austin
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 PM.