Got 175whp on the dyno today. Should I be happy? lol
Sorry no graphs because I didn't bring a disc and my tuners printer broke. I'll describe everything the best I can though. Powerband was basically climbing all the way to 8500rpms. No dips. Torque said pretty steady at 109lbs
Base run: 158whp 99lbs/tq
final run: 175whp 109lbs/tq
Stock JDM B16A bottomend
Skunk2 Stage 2 cams
supertech VS/retainers
AEBS manifold (all port matched)
ITR throttle body
head milled .020
Fake J's intake
Hondata gasket
Jasma header (bit pancaked on the bottom)
2.5" straight through exhaust
exedy 8.5lbs flywheel
chipped P28 with chip by pherable
tuned with VAFC2
I think thats it basically. What do you think?
Base run: 158whp 99lbs/tq
final run: 175whp 109lbs/tq
Stock JDM B16A bottomend
Skunk2 Stage 2 cams
supertech VS/retainers
AEBS manifold (all port matched)
ITR throttle body
head milled .020
Fake J's intake
Hondata gasket
Jasma header (bit pancaked on the bottom)
2.5" straight through exhaust
exedy 8.5lbs flywheel
chipped P28 with chip by pherable
tuned with VAFC2
I think thats it basically. What do you think?
Good numbers.
You should post a graph of this for others so they'll have a ideal of how to make power.
You should post a graph of this for others so they'll have a ideal of how to make power.
first off....what dyno was this on?
secondly, dreaming of high tq numbers from a b16 is pointless. High horsepower is obtainable on the other hand. Your hp levels seems very good. I also agree that your withholding some power in your intake and header.
good job tho...the gains seem substantial
secondly, dreaming of high tq numbers from a b16 is pointless. High horsepower is obtainable on the other hand. Your hp levels seems very good. I also agree that your withholding some power in your intake and header.
good job tho...the gains seem substantial
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2SlowDC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ure dented header is probably holding u back some</TD></TR></TABLE>
eh, i consider it as some back pressure
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mad Money »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you need more compression to run those cams....you would of probably seen better gains with Stage 1's</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah I know. I wanted stage 1s, but noone was selling them around me and I got the stg 2s for 500 brand new and needed cams asap so. Plus I'm most likely going to do a GSR bottom with PR3s or something in the future :crosses fingers:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dohcMONSTER »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">that intake makes about as much power as a stock intake arm with a drop in filter. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Not exactly sure what you're trying to say but I got it for $50 so w/e
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Viorent Grip! EG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">first off....what dyno was this on?
secondly, dreaming of high tq numbers from a b16 is pointless. High horsepower is obtainable on the other hand. Your hp levels seems very good. I also agree that your withholding some power in your intake and header.
good job tho...the gains seem substantial</TD></TR></TABLE>
Dynojet. Oh I know, when I saw the torque I started laughing lol. What do you suggest for intake and header? I don't really want to do a CAI or a velocity stack just because its a DD and I don't want to worry about that stuff.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would be very pleased if I were you actually.</TD></TR></TABLE>
word!
eh, i consider it as some back pressure

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mad Money »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you need more compression to run those cams....you would of probably seen better gains with Stage 1's</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah I know. I wanted stage 1s, but noone was selling them around me and I got the stg 2s for 500 brand new and needed cams asap so. Plus I'm most likely going to do a GSR bottom with PR3s or something in the future :crosses fingers:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dohcMONSTER »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">that intake makes about as much power as a stock intake arm with a drop in filter. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Not exactly sure what you're trying to say but I got it for $50 so w/e

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Viorent Grip! EG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">first off....what dyno was this on?
secondly, dreaming of high tq numbers from a b16 is pointless. High horsepower is obtainable on the other hand. Your hp levels seems very good. I also agree that your withholding some power in your intake and header.
good job tho...the gains seem substantial</TD></TR></TABLE>
Dynojet. Oh I know, when I saw the torque I started laughing lol. What do you suggest for intake and header? I don't really want to do a CAI or a velocity stack just because its a DD and I don't want to worry about that stuff.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would be very pleased if I were you actually.</TD></TR></TABLE>
word!
for the #s.I would say your plans would be much more gain then swapping intake and header now do them once you get the larger block with higher comp.
Nice run though.
if you stick w/ the b16 than toda header, but if you move on to your gsr bottom end, then another header like rage/dtr/ smsp/ etc etc.
and it was tuned on a vafc
good numbers
Modified by dragonz04 at 9:30 AM 5/10/2006
and it was tuned on a vafc
good numbers
Modified by dragonz04 at 9:30 AM 5/10/2006
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkoundrelUSA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This may be a dumb question, but whats wrong with the Fake J's intake w/ K&N 4" filter?</TD></TR></TABLE>
AEM is better (see below)
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1194241
AEM is better (see below)
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1194241
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkoundrelUSA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This may be a dumb question, but whats wrong with the Fake J's intake w/ K&N 4" filter?</TD></TR></TABLE>
A short ram intake arm with a velocity stack and a K&N made 3-5whp on my car as opposed to the fake J's w/ K&N I was running before.
It was a GSR with 11:1 c/r and Stage 1's. Our set-ups are actually pretty similar when I ran those cams and the J's intake.
The J's hype kinda wore off over the past year. I'll admit it... I bought into it.
A short ram intake arm with a velocity stack and a K&N made 3-5whp on my car as opposed to the fake J's w/ K&N I was running before.
It was a GSR with 11:1 c/r and Stage 1's. Our set-ups are actually pretty similar when I ran those cams and the J's intake.
The J's hype kinda wore off over the past year. I'll admit it... I bought into it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blazin Si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
A short ram intake arm with a velocity stack and a K&N made 3-5whp on my car as opposed to the fake J's w/ K&N I was running before.
It was a GSR with 11:1 c/r and Stage 1's. Our set-ups are actually pretty similar when I ran those cams and the J's intake.
The J's hype kinda wore off over the past year. I'll admit it... I bought into it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I wanted to keep the setup like everyday/street setup I guess, so I didn't want to use a velocity stack. But yeah the Fake J's I bought around 8 months ago for $50 so
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nick M »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A Jasma header? Isnt that like saying you have a "CARB" header?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't know there were "carbish" like DC. Aren't they just Mugen header knockoffs?
A short ram intake arm with a velocity stack and a K&N made 3-5whp on my car as opposed to the fake J's w/ K&N I was running before.
It was a GSR with 11:1 c/r and Stage 1's. Our set-ups are actually pretty similar when I ran those cams and the J's intake.
The J's hype kinda wore off over the past year. I'll admit it... I bought into it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I wanted to keep the setup like everyday/street setup I guess, so I didn't want to use a velocity stack. But yeah the Fake J's I bought around 8 months ago for $50 so

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nick M »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A Jasma header? Isnt that like saying you have a "CARB" header?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't know there were "carbish" like DC. Aren't they just Mugen header knockoffs?
I have no idea, I thought it was a company lol
me
edit: yeah you're right Nick. Any suggestions on a decent header that won't cost me a grand? I was thinking the ITR 4-1? Or is that considered a carb header too?
meedit: yeah you're right Nick. Any suggestions on a decent header that won't cost me a grand? I was thinking the ITR 4-1? Or is that considered a carb header too?
Yeah it is, I wouldnt bother with a US ITR header. I'd get atleast a JDM ITR header or a copy of it at the minimum.
You can search "Header" in this forum and find a ton of results. There are many good brands.
You can search "Header" in this forum and find a ton of results. There are many good brands.








